Oncologic Emergencies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Oncologic Emergencies

Description:

Nadir usually occurs 5 to 10 days after last chemo dose and usually recovers w/i ... Bed rest: controversial- but generally unnecessary. Anticoagulation: DVT ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1914
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: caseme8
Category:
Tags: back | bed | clinic | emergencies | health | how | icc | in | last | longer | lower | mayo | oncologic | pain | psa | to

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oncologic Emergencies


1
Oncologic Emergencies
  • Greg V. Manson
  • Sept 5, 2008 and Sept 18, 2008

2
Oncologic Emergencies
  • 4 Major types
  • Metabolic emergencies (hypercalcemia,
    hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, adrenal failure,
    lactic acidosis)
  • Hematologic emergencies (hyperleukocytosis, DIC,
    thrombosis )
  • Infectious / Inflammatory emergencies (typhlitis,
    pancreatitis, chemo infiltration, hemorrhagic
    cystitis )
  • Mechanical emergencies (cerebral
    herniation/status epilepticus, cardiac tamponade,
    SVC syndrome?)

3
911 VS 30512
4
Case 1
  • 77 y/o AAM w/ PMHx of CAD s/p CABG, DM, gout,
    bipolar I disorder, 5 year history of CLL comes
    to UCC fast track w/ severe fatigue, nausea, mild
    abdominal discomfort. Pt admitted to VA on ward
    3B. He was seen by heme/onc and started on oral
    hydroxyurea after diagnosis of acute blastic
    transformation. Youre signed-out to follow up
    on PM renal function panel.

5
Case 1
  • potassium 5.3 mEq/L
  • calcium 8.1 mg/dL
  • phosphate 5.5 mg/dL
  • lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 28,900 U/L
  • and uric acid 14.3 mg/dL
  • creatinine was normal, at 1.1 mg/dL

6
TUMOR LYSIS SYNDROME
7
Tumor Lysis Syndrome
  • TLS Metabolic derangements caused by the massive
    and abrupt release of cellular components into
    the blood after the rapid lysis of malignant
    cells. (?phos , ?K , ?uric acid , ?Ca)
  • Uric acid crystals and/or CaPO4 in renal tubules
    impaired renal function, ARF, even death
  • ?phos leads to ?Ca tetany, seizures,
    arrhythmia
  • ?K life-threatening arrhythmia

8
(No Transcript)
9
Tumor Lysis Syndrome WHO GETS IT?
  • High tumor cell proliferation rate, large tumor
    burden, tumor chemosensitivity
  • ALL, AML, NHL, Burkitts Lymphoma (heme
    malignancies) Small cell gtgtgt Hodgkins disease,
    Multiple Myeloma, Solid Tumors ( breast, GI,
    prostate etc.)
  • Signs and Symptoms are non-specific Can occur
    before chemo, but usually within 12 to 72hrs
    after starting chemo

Nausea Vomiting Diarrhea Anorexia Syncope
Lethargy Edema Fluid overload Cramps Sudden death
10
Tumor Lysis Syndrome WHO GETS IT?
  • Usually develops after chemotherapy (paclitaxel,
    fludarabine, etoposide, thalidomide, bortezomib,
    and hydroxyurea )
  • Can occur after radiation therapy,
    corticosteroids, chemoembolization, intrathecal
    chemotherapy, rarely from spontaneous necrosis
  • LDH is considered by some a measure of tumor load
    and a marker of TLS risk

11
Tumor Lysis Syndrome Prevention Management
  • The best management is prevention.
  • FLUIDS and HYDRATION
  • Aggressive hydration and diuresis
  • Improve intravascular volume, renal blood flow,
    GFR (decrease solute in distal nephron/renal
    microcirculation)
  • /- diuretics (contraindicated in hypovolemia and
    obstructed uropathy)

12
(No Transcript)
13
Tumor Lysis Syndrome Prevention Management
  • ALKALINIZATION OF URINE
  • -Uric acid gt 10xs more soluble in pH of 7.0
    compared to pH of 5.0
  • -Xanthine/hypoxanthine is also significantly
    more soluble in basic urine
  • - Historically used, but not based on evidence
    based practice. NOT RECOMMENDED
  • -Complications of alkalinization outweighs
    benefits (calcium phosphate precipitation,
    metabolic alkalosis)

14
Tumor Lysis Syndrome Prevention Management
  • ALLOPURINOL
  • -Competitive inhibitor of xanthine oxidase which
    decreases conversion of purine metabolites to
    uric acid. Used prophylactically for TLS
  • -Prophylactic option for patients with a medium
    risk of TLS
  • -Limitations
  • ----1)ineffective in reducing uric acid levels
    before chemoTx
  • ----2) Xanthine and hypoxanthine
    precipitate?obstructive uropathy
  • ----3)reduces clearance of some chemoTx
    (azothiopurine 6-mercaptopurine)

15
Tumor Lysis Syndrome Prevention Management
  • RASBURICASE (recombinant urate oxidase)
  • -promotes catabolism of uric acid
  • Uric acid ? allantoin (10x more soluble than
    uric acid)
  • -100 adult pt (w/ aggressive NHL) got 3 to 7
    days of rasburicase beginning day 1 of chemo
  • 1)Uric acid levels decreased w/i 4 hrs of
    rasburicase
  • 2)Normalized uric acid levels maintained
    throughout chemo
  • 3)No increase in creatinine observed
  • 4)No patient required dialysis
  • -One European and one US study showed that
    rasburicase prophylaxis resulted in net savings
    in health care costs (9,978 for 7 day stay VS.
    51,990 for 21 day stay w/ HD)

16
Case 2
  • 55 y/o w/ Hx of AML s/p stem cell transplant
    several months prior. Comes to ICC for scheduled
    and routine RBC transfusion. He is also
    receiving outpatient chemo therapy via PICC. Pt
    complains of fatigue and constipation. ICC
    nurses note temp of 36.1 C, BP 82/58,
    orthostasis. He is given 1L IVF and has routine
    labs drawn as he is transferred to Tower 6. He
    is admitted under the diagnosis of hypotension.

17
Case 2
  • Upon admission to floor he denies any other
    complaints, and is compliant w/ meds.
    Additionally he has been taking tylenol for 1 day
    hx of headache and 2 weeks of bisacodyl
    suppositories
  • His admission vitals 99.5, 109/76, 88, 20, 97
    on room air but is actively rigoring when you
    arrive
  • WBC 0.2 , ANC0.06

18
NEUTROPENIC FEVER
19
Neutropenic Fever
  • Neutropenia
  • ANC lt 500 or lt1000 w/ a predicted nadir of lt500
    cells
  • ANC (WBC) x ( of neutrophils of bands)
  • Nadir usually occurs 5 to 10 days after last
    chemo dose and usually recovers w/i 5 days of
    nadir (certain leukemia/lymphoma regimens cause
    longer lasting and more profound neutropenia)
  • Fever
  • - Single temp of 38.3oC (101.3oF)
  • - Sustained Temp of 38.0oC (100.4oF) for more
    than 1 hour

20
Neutropenic Fever
  • Before era of empiric antibiotics, infections
    accounted for 75 deaths related to chemotherapy
  • Fever is commonly the only symptom. Common
    infections present atypically (asymptomatic UTIs,
    PNA w/o infiltrates, meningitis w/o nuchal
    rigidity, bacteremia w/ only fatigue)
  • Avoid digital rectal exams/manipulations
  • Careful oral exam and exam of catheter sites if
    any
  • Pan Cx

21
Neutropenic Fever
  • BACTERIA
  • Until 1980s, GNR (P.aeruginosa) were the most
    commonly identified pathogens
  • 1995-2000, Gram organisms 62-76 of all
    bloodstream infections
  • Trend toward Gram due to introduction of
    long-term indwelling lines (Hickmans,Mediports)
  • FUNGAL
  • - Risk increases w/ duration and severity of
    neutropenia, prolonged antibiotic use, and number
    of chemotherapy cycles
  • -Candida (lines), aspergillus (immunocompromised,
    skin,sinus, PNA) gtgtgthisto, blasto, coccidio,
    TB(prolonged steroids, other high risk patients)

22
(Neutropenic Fever) TREATMENT
  • Numerous regimens studied monotherapy
    demonstrated equivalent to two drug regimens
    (i.e. piperacillin/tazobactam , cefepime,
    meropenem)
  • In critically ill, add on aminoglycoside (better
    G - coverage)
  • Addition of Gram () as initial empiric coverage
    in patients w/o port/catheter/line or mucositis
    has no proven clinical benefit (?VRE)
  • Vancomycin or Linezolid

-Skin or catheter infection -Hx of MRSA
colonization -recent quinolone proph
-Clinical deterioration -Hypotension -Mucositis
23
(Neutropenic Fever) TREATMENT
  • Fungal coverage (candida or aspergillus ssp. )
  • Routinely added after 5-7 days of persistent
    neutropenic fever w/o clear source
  • Post mortem of fatalities after prolonged febrile
    neutropenia (1966-1975) 69 w/ evidence of
    systemic fungal disease
  • Tx with liposomal amphotericin B (most common),
    voriconazole(? failed noninferiority trial?),
    caspofungin (passed noninferiority trial, less
    nephrotoxic aspergillus failure?)
  • No fluconazole ? efficacy

24
(Neutropenic Fever) TREATMENT
  • Colony Stimulating Factors (CSF)
  • NOT routinely used for neutropenic fever unless
    the patient had previous bout of neutropenic
    fever with prior chemo cycle.
  • Not shown to decrease mortality
  • Beneficial effects are quite modest
  • Used in neutropenic septic shock/severe sepsis
    (hypotension, organ dysfunction, PNA)
  • Used in patients whose bone marrow recovery is
    expected to be especially prolonged.

25
Case 3
  • 64 y/o WM w/o significant past medical history
    comes to ED w/ complaints of progressive LBP. He
    notes pain initially started approx 6-8 weeks ago
    w/o inciting event. He is normally very active
    and enjoys jogging/biking currently still
    working as bartender. He went to Chagrin
    Highlands Urgent Care two weeks ago and got
    routine lumbosacral films which were essentially
    normal. He was discharged home w/ course of high
    dose NSAIDS. He comes to UH ED w/ complaints of
    persistent and progressive band like lower back
    pain. He notes new unsteadiness when he walks
    for the last two days, which prompted him to come
    to medical attention.

26
Case 3
  • In ED vitals and labs were within normal limits
  • MRI of spine showed metastatic disease diffusely
    noted w/ thecal sac impingement at level of L2-L3
  • PSA sent from ED 68

27
SPINALCORD COMPRESSION
28
Spinal Cord Compression
  • Neoplastic epidural spinal cord compression
  • Neoplastic invasion of space between vertebrae
    and spinal cord (epidural invasion)
  • Defined as ANY thecal sac indentation
    radiographically (spinal cord or cauda equina)

29
(No Transcript)
30
LOCATION
  • Thoracic spine 60
  • Lumbosacral spine 30
  • Cervical spine 10

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Spinal Cord Compression
  • Cord compression is a common complication in
    oncology patients (5-10 of all cancer patients
    prostate, lung, breast) which is a cause of pain
    and irreversible loss of neurologic function.
  • NOT immediately life threatening unless it
    involves C3 or above
  • Back pain is the precursor to spinal cord injury
    in almost all (96)patients w/ spinal mets. Pain
    similar to disc disease except ? pain supine,
    ?upright

34
Spinal Cord Compression
  • Besides back pain
  • Radicular pain
  • Motor weakness
  • Gait disturbance
  • Bowel bladder dysfunction

35
Spinal Cord Compression
  • Diagnosis
  • Back pain known malignancy SCC until proven
    otherwise
  • Plain films NOT enough
  • Exam has poor accuracy with localizing level
  • MRI without contrast is the best test for SCC
    when suspected
  • Can resort to CT (myelography) if pt cannot
    tolerate MRI, is not candidate for MRI, or not
    available.

36
Spinal Cord Compression
  • TREATMENT
  • Steroids
  • Radiation Therapy
  • Surgery

37
Spinal Cord CompressionTreatment
  • Corticosteroids
  • Provides pain relief and anti-inflammation
  • Dexamethasone Loading dose of 10mg to 16mg
    followed by 4mg q 4hrs.
  • Higher doses (100mg) may be associated w/
    slightly better outcome in exchange for higher
    incidence of adverse effects. Reserved for
    paraplegia/paraparesis generally. (low vs high
    dose studies equivocal)
  • Taper once definitive treatment is underway

38
Spinal Cord CompressionTreatment
  • Radiation Therapy
  • This alone can be used for patients who are
    ambulatory and for pretreatment before paresis
    occurs.
  • Doses is variable and determined by the quantity
    of previous XRT, type of tumor, and the field of
    treatment
  • For extensive disease limited survival
    meaningful palliation (short courses)
  • Chemotherapy can be used but most tumor types not
    particularly chemosensitive (unless NHL,
    Hodgkins, germ cell, breast).

39
Spinal Cord CompressionTreatment
  • Surgery---evolving science
  • THEN Previous studies Laminectomy w/ or w/o RT
    vs RT alone NO difference in outcome
  • Decompressive resection reserved for unstable
    spine, life threatening compression, unknown
    etiology, tumors that are not reliably
    radiosensitive or chemosensitive.
  • NOW Newer studies show surgical intervention
    XRT show BETTER functional status than XRT
    alone (anterior approach, improvements in
    instrumentation)

40
Spinal Cord CompressionTreatment
  • Other Management issues
  • Quickly involve Rad/onc and NeuroSx / Ortho
  • Analgesia opioids, steroids
  • Bed rest controversial- but generally
    unnecessary
  • Anticoagulation DVT prophylaxis
  • Bowel regimen autonomic dysfunction, opioids,
    limited mobility all contribute to constipation
  • Spinal bracing only in patients with refractory
    pain

41
Spinal Cord CompressionPrognosis
  • Best predictor is pre-treatment
    functional/neurologic status
  • Rapid onset and quick progression poor Px
  • 75 of patients treated correctly while still
    ambulatory, will remain ambulatory
  • Only 10 of patients presenting with paraplegia
    will regain ambulatory status

42
References
  • Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric and
    Adult Tumor LYsis Syndrome An Evidence Based
    Review. Bernard et al. Journal of Clinical
    Oncology. Vol 26. June 1 2008
  • Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine.
    Kasper, Dennis MD, et al. 16th ed. 577-582.
    2006.
  • Oncologic Emergencies Diagnosis and Treatment.
    Halfdanarsan et al. Mayo Clinic Procedings. June
    2006 81(6). 835-848
  • Fever in the neutropenic adult patient with
    cancer. Robbins,Gregory. Up to Date Online.
    May 31, 2008
  • Oncologic Emergencies for the Internist.
    Krimsky, William, et al. Cleveland Clinic Journal
    of Medicine. Vol 69. 3. March 2002
  • Treatment and Prognosis of Epidural Spinal Cord
    Compression, Including Cauda Equina Syndrome.
    Schiff, David et al. Up to Date Online. May 31,
    2008.
  • Tumor Lysis Syndrome. eMedicine. Koyamangalath
    Krishnan

43
Learning Objectives
  • Identification of 3 major oncologic emergencies
  • Management of tumor lysis syndrome
  • Management of neutropenic fever
  • Management of spinal cord compression
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com