The Potential of Supportive Housing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The Potential of Supportive Housing

Description:

... CDBG program for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed properties ... This bill reforming the Section 811 program has passed out of the House and just ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: martik7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Potential of Supportive Housing


1
The Potential of Supportive Housing
  • NM LEGISLATIVE
  • HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
  • Marti Knisley
  • The Technical Assistance Collaborative
  • October 15, 2008
  • www.tacinc.org

2
What is Supportive Housing
  • A cost-effective combination of permanent,
    affordable housing with services that helps
    people with disabilities and persons with limited
    incomes who have needs for supportive services
    live more stable, healthy productive lives

3
What is Supportive Housing ?
  • It is permanent, meaning each tenant may stay as
    long as he or she pays rent and complies with
    terms of lease or rental agreement
  • It is affordable, meaning each tenant pays no
    more than 30 to 50 of household income
  • Tenants have access to an array of support
    services that are intended to support housing
    stability, recovery and resiliency, but
    participation in support services is not a
    requirement for tenancy
  • Options are available for adults who are single,
    those who choose to share housing, youth
    transitioning out of juvenile or protective
    services and families with children
  • Housing First low demand models provide
    access for tenants with long histories of
    homelessness, incarceration, foster care
    institutionalization, residential treatment and
    significant obstacles to housing stability often
    at much lower cost than they are being served in
    traditional care

4
Supportive Housing is Cost Effective
  • Medicaid, health and other human services systems
    incur substantial costs providing care often with
    mixed success
  • Costs of serving homeless people with serious
    mental illness up to
  • 40,000 / year or more mostly in health care
    systems
  • 28,000 annual costs in Maine mostly health care
    in hospitals
  • 28,000 average annual health costs for Boston
    street dwellers
  • Health care costs for public inebriates typically
    exceed 8,000/year
  • 46,700 average Medicaid charges prior to
    supportive housing move-in for chronic alcoholics
    in Seattle

5
Supportive Housing is Cost Effective
  • Supportive housing significantly reduces the need
    for costly emergency care and hospitalizations
  • 45 fewer days of nursing home care and 42
    fewer days inpatient hospitalization in Chicago
  • 56 fewer emergency room visits and 44 fewer
    inpatient admissions in San Francisco
  • 77 fewer inpatient hospitalizations and 60
    fewer ambulance transports in Maine
  • 34 fewer emergency room visits and 40 fewer
    inpatient hospital days in Denver
  • Health outcomes improve with better engagement in
    more appropriate outpatient care
  • However, cost offsets only work when persons
    getting the supportive housing intervention have
    used or will use public services

6
The NM Purchasing Collaboratives
Approach to Supportive Housing
  • The Behavioral Health Purchasing Collaborative is
    taking a very proactive, sensible approach to
    supportive housing
  • The Collaborative began this approach by
    developing a Long Range Housing Plan in 2007
    that began with an assessment of need, an
    inventory of what housing and services resources
    exist and a blueprint for capacity building,
    new and use of available development and rental
    resources and implementing best practice service
    approaches
  • The Plan provided insight to opportunities for
    leveraging resources, drawing down federal funds
    and efficient use of existing resources
  • ---with one caveat these opportunities are
    tied to successful partnerships between the
    services system and housing development and
    management systemsthe MFA, local Public Housing
    Authorities, Community Development organizations
    and developers

7
The NM Purchasing Collaboratives
Approach to Supportive Housing
  • The assessment was also revealed
  • Over 30,000 New Mexicans with disabilities living
    on fixed incomes at 30 or below the Area Median
    Income are in need of supportive housing
  • Vets, tribal members, families in the protective
    services system have high service needs and low
    incomes
  • Most New Mexico communities have little capacity
    and infrastructure to create and sustain deeply
    affordable housing with services attached to
    their housing
  • Rental resources, the backbone of any supportive
    housing plan are scare and need to generated for
    the Plan to be successful
  • Based on these assessments, the Purchasing
    Collaborative immediately began implementing the
    Plan with a FY 2008 funding request of 750,000
    to high priority areas and a focus on creating
    partnerships and a focus on capacity building and
    creating rental resources tied to services

8
The NM Purchasing Collaboratives
Approach to Supportive Housing
  • The 750,000 Allocation was targeted to
  • 150,000 in MFA Pre-development grant funds that
    was awarded to two developers who agreed to
    target units for persons needing supportive
    housing
  • 250,000 for Capacity Building grants also
    administered by MFA to two organizations who are
    developing housing and targeting units for
    supportive housing
  • 350,000 to pilot Linkages, a new bridge rental
    subsidy program jointly administered by local
    housing administrators and service providers to
    test out the feasibility of model that utilizes
    rental subsides and services funds---ultimately
    leading to a largely federally funded program
    once capacity is established
  • This program began with serving 30 persons in the
    Silver City and Demming area, Santa Fe and
    Albuquerque
  • The program is focused on seriously mentally ill
    persons (including those with substance abuse
    disorders) who are homeless, those at risk of
    homelessness and off reservation Native
    Americans

9
The NM Purchasing Collaboratives
Approach to Supportive Housing
  • In FY 2008, CYFD utilizing 150,000 of their own
    operating funds developed a small 20 youth
    rental assistance/services pilot in partnership
    with the Supportive Housing Coalition of New
    Mexico to test out the feasibility of this model
    for youth transitioning out of the juvenile
    services and protective service programs in
    Albuquerque
  • Early indications from both pilots this is a
    feasible model and should be expanded across the
    state
  • Armed with this Plan and experience with pilots,
    the Collaborative is moving forwarded with---a
    new partnership for with MFA in their 2009 Low
    Income Tax Credit Program application giving
    incentives to developers who target units for
    persons with disabilities
  • ---work with local communities to build capacity
  • ---preparing to take advantage of federal
    funding opportunities

10
Federal Housing Actions
Potential for New Mexico
  • We are entering into an unusually positive and
    active
  • period of supportive housing activity at the
    federal level
  • Greater Congressional interest due to major
    alliances among national policy, advocacy and
    trade groups, very positive outcomes of
    supportive housing and the housing and credit
    crisis creating a need for more affordable
    housing and jobs
  • This interest has translated into
  • Passage of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act
    which includes the National Housing Trust Fund,
    the Neighborhood Stabilization Program and many
    other provisions
  • Movement on the Frank Melville Act

11
Federal Housing Actions
Potential for New Mexico
  • The National Housing Trust Fund (part of Natl.
    Housing and
  • Economic Recovery Act)
  • 90 of the funds must be used for production,
    preservation, rehabilitation or operation of
    rental housing
  • 75 of the funds must benefit extremely low
    income households (people at or below 30 of the
    AMI) and all funds must benefit very low income
    households. 
  • It will be distributed by HUD in grants to the
    states
  • The HUD Secretary will establish a distribution
    formula within 12 months and the state has two
    years to spend its allocation 
  • Funds will be available in 2010/funding is
    generated on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
    transactions
  • States need capacity to use funds within allotted
    timeframes

12
Federal Housing Actions
Potential for New Mexico
  • Neighborhood Stabilization Program (part of the
    Natl. Housing and
  • Economic Recovery Act)
  • A 3.92 billion CDBG program for the
    redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed
    properties
  • Grantees are CDBG jurisdictions (both state and
    local)
  • Funds can go toward both single family and rental
    properties and 25 of the resources must benefit
    people at 50 or below of Area Median Income
  • Based on huge rush to get these funds into
    communities and create construction jobs, many
    CDBG requirements can be waived and there is no
    one-for-one replacement requirement
  • Natl. disability groups are working this week to
    proposes mechanisms to assure people with
    disabilities will benefit from this program

13
Federal Housing Actions
Potential for New Mexico
  • Section 811 Reform Frank Melville Act (HR
    5772)
  • Section 811 is a federally funded, deeply
    affordable permanent rental housing program for
    people with disabilities. Funding covers housing
    production, rental assistance and services
  • This bill reforming the Section 811 program has
    passed out of the House and just introduced in
    the Senate
  • It authorizes a new and innovative Section 811
    Project Rental Assistance Contract (PRAC)
    Demonstration program to create thousands of new
    Section 811 units each year without substantially
    increasing Section 811 appropriations levels by
    leveraging new set-asides of supportive housing
    units in federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit
    (LIHTC) properties and HOME-funded projects
  • This program uses a competitive funding process
    and states with supportive housing capacity will
    likely be more successful
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com