Title: Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxics PBT Program Setting the Context
1Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxics (PBT)
ProgramSetting the Context
- TOM MURRAY, USEPA
- EPA PBT Monitoring Workshop
- April 22, 2002
- Raleigh, North Carolina
2Happy Earth Day!
3IM HERE TO .
- Provide some context
- Explore the question Who cares?
- A Perspective on the Monitoring Strategy
- Share a few thoughts on the challenges that lie
ahead
4The Context
- The PBT Program as an organizing principle
- GPRA goals and measures
- Our scope
- The PBT Program National Action Plans
5The Context
- The PBT Program as an organizing principle
6What is the PBT Program?
- All programs working together to
- Identify and reduce risks to human health and the
environment from current and future exposures to
priority PBT pollutants - Stop their transfer across environmental media!
- Prevent new PBT chemicals from entering commerce
7What are its Program Goals?
- Reduce risks to human health and the environment
from current and future exposures to priority PBT
contaminants - Reduce/eliminate PBT emissions in U.S. and
promote international reductions - Reduce exposure of general U.S. populations,
especially high risk populations
8The National PBT Program Agenda
- Focus on Mercury, Dioxin/Furans, PCBs first
- Focus on two cross-cutting issues
- MONITORING
- Outreach/risk communication
- Derive actions from National Action Plans
- Get the resources to where the action is
- Build on successful efforts
- Provide the tools to get the job done
9What is the value added by the PBT Program?
- It facilitates corporate decisionmaking.
- It simplifies communication to outside
stakeholders. - It fosters holistic problem solving.
- It engenders the use of sound science.
- It leads to win-win solutions, more responsible
spending and more effective coordination among
programs both within and outside of EPA.
10- Alaskan Native Fetal Cord Blood Monitoring Program
- Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program
11What fuels the PBT Program?
- Human Health and Ecological Concerns
- Realization that some single-medium approaches
fall short - Realization that for efforts like monitoring, no
one program can do it - States, Tribes, Legislators, Stakeholders
- Tenacity, hard work and determination
- A specified Agency-wide budget
12- Http//intranet.epa.gov/ocfo/plan/plan.htm
13PBT Program Management Structure
14The Context
- The PBT Program as an organizing principle
- GPRA goals and measures
15GPRA GOALS
16The Context
- The PBT Program as an organizing principle
- GPRA goals and measures
- Scope
17(No Transcript)
18PBTs -- A Global Priority
- "Pollutants that are persistent, bioaccumulative
and toxic have been linked to numerous adverse
effects in humans and animals. The United States
has taken extensive action over the years to
address these pollutants. But such pollutants not
only remain in the environment for years and even
decades, they also travel far beyond their
initial points of release, posing threats across
national and geographic boundaries. Only by
addressing the threat of these pollutants on a
global scale can we help to meet our goal of
leaving America's air cleaner, our water purer,
and our land better protected.
-Christine Todd Whitman
19The Context
- The PBT Program as an organizing principle
- GPRA goals and measures
- Scope
- The PBT Program National Action Plans
20 National Action Plans
- Alkyl-Lead
- Benzo(a)Pyrene
- Dioxins/Furans
- Hexachlorobenzene
- Mercury and Compounds
- Octachlorostyrene
- PCBs
- PESTICIDES
- Aldrin/Dieldrin, Chlordane
- Mirex,DDT(DDDDDE), Camphechlor(Toxaphene)
21What are the major monitoring needs identified in
the NAPs?
- Magnitude and nature of the human Exposure
Problem (Hg, Dioxins, B(a)P, HCB) - Magnitude and nature of exposure for high-risk
populations (PCBs, Dioxins, HCB, B(a)P) - Long-term National Environmental Trends (Hg,
PCBs,Dioxins, Pesticides,HCB, B(a)P and OCS)
22What are the major monitoring needs identified in
the NAPs?
- International Contribution (Mercury, PCBs,
Dioxins, Pesticides, HCB, B(a)P - Monitoring data to support environmental modeling
needs in predicting environmental levels and
multimedia transfers (Hg, PCBs and Dioxins) - Support for Fish and Wildlife Consumption
Advisory Programs (Hg, PCBs, Dioxins and
pesticides)
23What are the major monitoring needs identified in
the NAPs?
- Source Characterization (Hg, PCBs, Dioxins, HCB,
B(a)P and OCS
24 25Our decision makers care!
- Our Senior Management Officials
- The White House Office of Science and Technology
- U.S. General Accounting Office
- Commission for Environmental Cooperation
- UNEP
26But , more Importantly
27Our Tribal Partners Say
- Abnormalities in animals and fish (e. g. wormy
whitefish and lesions on salmon, and Whirling
disease) - Moose meat tastes different and there are water
bags in their lungs - Muskrats have spots on their liver and lungs
- Caribou have runny bone marrow
28A National Routine Monitoring Strategy should
- Summarize and orchestrate current PBT monitoring
activities - Discern trends in both human health and
ecosystems (GPRA?) - Measure the effectiveness of national actions to
meet the PBT program goals - Integrate across environmental media
- Integrate modeling
29(No Transcript)
30Challenges
311. No single governmental jurisdiction can solve
the problem!!
- All federal, state, tribal, international
organizations must work together!
322 Monitoring is Costly
333 Monitoring takes time to yield valid results
- Persevere! And think of ways to keep impatient
decision makers happy
- Maryland Terps National Champions!!
344. Maintain the vision
- As pollution problems become more complex, our
monitoring programs must become more
sophisticated and cost-effective. We cannot
control what we cannot measure and we cannot
correct what we do not know. - John R. Quarles, Jr. Deputy Administrator
- 1977