Heriot Watt University Breakout Session MCQ with Confidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Heriot Watt University Breakout Session MCQ with Confidence

Description:

E-Assessment can be viewed from different perspectives. Commercial ... David Beckham. Victoria Beckham. Brooklyn Beckham. Romeo Beckham. Rewards? Know it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:179
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: hwAc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Heriot Watt University Breakout Session MCQ with Confidence


1
Heriot Watt UniversityBreakout SessionMCQ with
Confidence
  • Dr Phil Davies
  • Division of Computing Mathematical Sciences
  • Department of Computing
  • FAT
  • University of Glamorgan

2
E-Assessment can be viewed from different
perspectives
  • Commercial / Large Scale Implementations
  • Question Marks Perception
  • MOODLE
  • Triads (25 different types of Multiple Choice
    Type Questions!)
  • TOIA (FREE!) Tool for On-line Interoperable
    Assessment
  • Blackboard Assessment (version!)
  • Standards (IMS QTI Specification)
  • Try it and see

3
How easy to do MCQ?Cost?
  • Question
  • Key
  • Distracter One, Distracter Two, ..
  • Note
  • Key(s) must always be correct
  • How many students would you expect to get it
    right for it to be a GOOD question?
  • Distracter One / Two / Three equal of
    selections
  • Throw away BAD questions?

4
TOO HARD .. ?
  • Too time consuming
  • Often needs to be an iterative process
  • Does it matter if a question is NOT perfect?
  • Seeking perfection not feasible
  • I suggest that assessment MUST be included within
    a module, not only at end make it embedded
    within TEACHING LEARNING experience
  • Formative / Summative / Both

5
My Entry into CAA
  • 1st Attempt TOTAL FAILURE 1998 OLAL
  • 5 minutes all finished apart from one student
  • Guessing
  • Why should the student care if incorrect?
  • How to make it worthwhile slow students down
    make them think
  • Negative marking used 2 and -1 (actually becomes
    -3 double whammy!)
  • Allow TWO PASSES of the test
  • By concentrating on first pass
  • will get reward on second pass
  • Formative
  • IMPORTANT WORTH MARKS

6
(No Transcript)
7
Own Background Objective Testing via MCQ
  • Four Tests MCQ .. Two passes 50/50 (became
    graduated)
  • Cumulative Tests 5, 10, 15, 20
  • Amateur .. No Research Pedigree (CAA Conference)
  • Improved Class results not easier more
    directed
  • Weaker students improved dramatically
  • Assessed the learning outcomes of subject
  • END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS

8
What did the students say about it?
  • Excellent way of gaining knowledge
  • 2nd Test Allowed us to learn
  • Good assistant to learning
  • Encourages Revision
  • Very good, promotes learning of a subject early
    on
  • Better than sex!!!!

9
What decides the QUALITY of a question?
  • In the 2004 World cup qualifier between England
    and Greece, who scored the all important
    equalizing goal?
  • David Beckham
  • Victoria Beckham
  • Brooklyn Beckham
  • Romeo Beckham

10
Rewards?
  • Know it
  • On the tip of my tongue
  • If I see the answers Ill know it
  • Deduction
  • Guess
  • Know it oh no Ive got it wrong ..
    misinformation

11
TRIED ONE CONFIDENCE TEST ONLY SHOWS ANSWERS ONCE
CONFIDENCE SELECTED RELATES TO MARKS 4, 2, 1,
-2, -1, 0
12
Proportion of Questions Correct
  • High Confidence 84 correct
  • Fairly Confident 58 correct
  • Not confident 47 correct
  • 72 of all questions answered with high confidence

13
Student thoughts on Confidence
  • Eliminates guesswork
  • I was waiting for a leggy blond to bring on my
    prize at the end
  • separated the lucky students from me
  • at least I didnt lose marks for selecting no
    confidence
  • are you testing my confidence or knowledge

14
Bite The Bullet
  • Use Confidence Testing for all four tests (10,
    15, 20 25)
  • Real SHOCK to students
  • Weighting of Passes (50/50, 60/40, 70/30 80/20)
  • How to judge if the students had really
    learned?
  • Select five questions that were answered
    poorest in test one pass through to test two
  • Select five questions that were answered
    poorest in test two pass through to test
    three ( original five) . Etc.

15
(No Transcript)
16
Identifying Quality of a Question
  • Negative on first pass e.g. -180
  • Difference between first and second pass
  • Too big an improvement may just signify a very
    poor question e.g. 500?
  • Create heuristic that identifies degree of
    difficulty of a question

17
Passed through to Test Four
  • 13 of the hardest question
  • 6 new questions based upon additional work
    between tests 3-4
  • 21 questions (cross section of questions and
    topics from previous tests)

18
Improvement of Results Through Tests
19
Improvement Pass One of Questions
20
Improvement for Question 5
  • Stronger Students improved quickly through the
    tests
  • Became more confident in answering the questions
  • Weaker Students improved less quickly than
    stronger through the test progress, but DID
    improve

21
Is it just Confidence or Knowledge i.e. questions
right or wrong?
22
Quality of a multiple choice question?
  • In the 2004 World cup qualifier between England
    and Greece, who scored the all important
    equalizing goal?
  • Teddy Sheringham
  • Michael Owen
  • Robbie Fowler
  • QUALITY OF QUESTION NOT DISTRACTERS

23
Developmental v Assessment
  • Need not be at alternative ends of the scale
  • Student motivation / attendance increased
    considerably
  • Testing knowledge (not done at moment for higher
    order skills)
  • Good students have best results i.e. number of
    questions correct

24
COMMENTS?
  • HMCQ
  • Confidence
  • Two Pass
  • Formative Summative
  • Graduated Assessment
  • Continual Assessment

25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com