WSR88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

WSR88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS

Description:

WSR-88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS. DENNIS A. MILLER ... Generally run once per hour at H 15 mins for each radar using hourly rainfall ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: Jay100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WSR88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS


1
WSR-88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC
APPLICATIONS DENNIS A. MILLER
2
Enhancements to PPS
  • Build 10 (Nov. 1998)
  • Terrain Following Hybrid Scan
  • Graphical Hybrid Scan
  • Adaptable parameters appended to DPA
  • Open Systems RPG
  • Range Correction
  • Mean Field Bias Correction

3
Radar Precipitation Estimation Stage II and III
Processing
HDP 4 km res.
RFC
WFO
Stage II
Stage II
Rain gages
WHFS/FFMP
Stage III
4
Stage II
  • Processing for individual radars
  • 4 km resolution on HRAP grid
  • 131 x 131 array

5
Stage II
  • Mean field bias adjustment
  • multisensor gage/radar merging
  • gage only analysis

6
Stage II processing
  • Generally run once per hour at H15 mins for each
    radar using hourly rainfall ending at H00 min
  • Updated every hour to incorporate late arriving
    gage data by (H115,H215 etc)

7
(No Transcript)
8
Automated QC of HDP Data
  • Removal of HRAP bin data that are consistently
    bad (e.g. Mountain blockage or ground clutter
    contamination)
  • Removal of bin data contaminated by anomolous
    propagation (AP) though use of GOES IR satellite
    and surface temperature data
  • Removal of outlier bin data (R gt threshold)

9
Mean Field Bias Adjustment
  • Attempts to account for uniform errors over the
    entire field such as radar calibration, improper
    Z-R relationship
  • Bias is a function of current and previous hours
    bias
  • Memory span parameter indicates how many hours to
    look into the past when determining the current
    bias

10
Mean Field Bias Adjustment
11
Single Optimal Estimation
12
Stage II Multisensor Rainfall Field Generation
13
Stage II
14
Stage III
  • Mosaics Stage II multisensor rainfall estimates
    on to larger HRAP grid
  • Interactive Quality Control
  • Can be used as main input into hydrologic models
    through (MAPX)

15
Stage III Mosaic
  • In areas that where more than one radar overlaps
    forecaster has choice
  • mean value of overlapping bins
  • maximum value of overlapping bins
  • If multisensor field is not available for a given
    area, the gage only field is used

16
Stage III interactive features
  • Display geographic overlays
  • Time Lapse
  • Zoom
  • Display and Edit Gages
  • Add pseudo gages
  • Delete AP
  • Re-run Stage II and re-mosaic

17
(No Transcript)
18
Important Adaptable Parameters
  • Memory Span (1-1000)
  • controls responsiveness of bias adjustment
  • Indicator Cross Correlation Coefficient (0-1)
  • controls how good radar verses gage is at
    indicating where it is raining
  • Conditional Cross Correlation Coefficient (0-1)
  • controls how good radar verses gage is at
    indicating amount of rainfall

19
Case Study
  • Site ABRFC
  • Study impact of varying adaptable parameters
  • Vary ICC (0-1)
  • Vary CCC(0-1)
  • Compare with 24 hour co-op gages
  • Compare forecast with observed hydrograph

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Raw unadjusted Radar Estimate
Analysis of 24 hour co-op reports
27
Bias Corrected Radar
28
Multisensor
29
WATTS RADAR ONLY WITH NO BIAS ADJUSTMENT
30
WATTS GAGE ONLY
31
WATTS RADAR ONLY WITH BIAS ADJUSTMENT
32
WATTS MULTISENSOR ESTIMATE
33
RFC-WIDE Multisensor Precipitation Estimation
  • Mosaic of data from lowest available height
  • Radar Climatology used to define blocked areas
  • Optimal Estimation to fill missing areas using
    available gages and surrounding good radar data
  • Satellite and Model Data to delineate clear air
    AP
  • No radar data taken from above freezing level
    used
  • PRISM data used to scale estimates in missing
    areas

34
FCX frequency of rainfall
35
FCX Coverage
36
PBZ Total Rainfall Summer Months
37
Summer Coverage
38
PBZ Total Rainfall Winter Months
39
Winter coverage
40
HEIGHT OF COVERAGE
RADAR COVERAGE MAP
41
RADAR COVERAGE MAP
PRECIPITATION MOSAIC
42
BIAS ADJUSTMENT
43
MULTISENSOR ESTIMATION FILLS MISSING AREAS
44
MULTISENSOR ESTIMATION FILLS MISSING AREAS
45
HURRICANE FLOYD RAINFALL
46
(No Transcript)
47
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com