Energy Auction Alternatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Energy Auction Alternatives

Description:

Simultaneous Ascending Clock Auctions (SACA) auctions improve results by ... Having won Widget X, Bidder A doesn* t bid in the auction for Widget Y: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: jasons79
Learn more at: https://www.bauer.uh.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Energy Auction Alternatives


1
Energy Auction Alternatives
  • Sam Dinkin
  • Chief Economist

2
The kinds problem we are solving
  • Offshore leases, government sales and foreign
    concessions
  • The National Petroleum Reserve has a collection
    of similar oil leases
  • Property acquisition and disposition
  • Power plant sales
  • Power purchasing and sale
  • NJ BGS auction
  • Texas Capacity Auction
  • Simultaneous Ascending Clock Auctions (SACA)
    auctions improve results by allowing switching

3
Switching Illustration
  • There are two items being auctioned
  • Widget X and Widget Y
  • There is one strong bidder, A
  • Willing to buy either item for up to 1000
  • Isnt interested in both who needs two widgets?
  • There are two weak bidders
  • Bidder B will pay up to 500 for Widget X or up
    to 200 for Widget Y
  • Bidder C will pay up to 200 for Widget X or up
    to 500 for Widget Y
  • Values can be shown in a table

Y
X
X
Y
A
C
B
4
Sequential Auctions
  • Suppose Widget X is auctioned first
  • A typical auction might proceed as follows
  • Having won Widget X, Bidder A doesnt bid in the
    auction for Widget Y
  • The total revenue from this auction is 700
  • The afternoon effect is clear the price
    dropped dramatically in the later auction

X
Y
Bought for 500
No longer valued
300
500
Sold to Bidder A for 500!
Sold to Bidder C for 200!
100
400
Bought for 200
200
5
Simultaneous Auction
  • A simultaneous auction is superior
  • Bidders, in particular the strong bidders, can
    switch between the two widgets
  • Because the strong bidder, A was able to switch
    back and forth between the two items
  • The end prices were the same
  • The final revenue was 1000, instead of 700
  • Simultaneous bidding avoids the price drop!

X
Y
Bought for 500
300 on Y
100 on Y
200 on X
400 on X
500 on Y
Bought for 500
100 on X
300 on X
500 on X
X is Sold to B for 500! Y is Sold to A for 500!
200 on Y
400 on Y
6
The Afternoon Effect
  • When items are auctioned in sequence, prices tend
    to drop off in later auctions
  • Known as the afternoon effect as the sun
    begins to fall, so do prices
  • Strong bidders win earlier auctions (certainty)
    and then go home
  • I.e. those willing to pay the most
  • In the later auctions, only the weak bidders
    are left
  • I.e. those willing to pay the least
  • With weaker bidders, prices are lower
  • Actually happened in US Broadcast Satellite
    auction
  • It pays for the strong bidder to sometimes bide
    his time
  • Even when prices are higher in the second
    auction, the different prices are unfair and
    lower revenue overall
  • Simultaneous auctions have similar prices for
    similar lots and have higher revenues than
    sequential auctions

7
Emerging Answer Simultaneous Auction
  • ERCOT and PJM, the two most progressive electric
    grids, have used simultaneous auction for over
    10B in electricity sales
  • Sources at New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
    and electricity distribution companies estimate
    they would have been 1.3B worse off had they
    used sealed bids
  • Alberta power generation sales
  • EDF auction
  • Upcoming Northeast Regional Capacity Market
  • FCC used to sell 30B of telecom spectrum in
    dozens of auctions with geographical synergies

8
Simultaneous Auctions Are Superior
  • Iterative nature of multiple rounds means
  • Bidders dont have to guess what it takes to win
  • Bidders can improve bids each round
  • Bidder gain valuable information about valuations
    in the market that reinforce their own valuations
  • Bidders can be assured of not winning more than
    they want
  • Rules are designed to be efficient
  • The auction is fast the bid increment is large
    when there is a lot of competition and small when
    there is a little competition.
  • Tie-break rules select the most interested bidder
    at each step in the bidding process
  • The high value bidder always wins paying a lower
    of their maximum value increasing auction
    revenue and bidder profit
  • Fair to all participants
  • Substitution between similar lots provides
    additional competition from low-quantity bidders
  • Expert auction design provides strong weight in
    Board Room decisions

9
Sealed Bid vs. SACA Bidder Values
X
Y
  • A typical situation in which a SACA generates
    higher revenues
  • Two leases X and Y
  • Three bidders
  • Bidder A values
  • X for 1700
  • Y for 1700
  • X Y for 2800
  • Bidder B values
  • X for 1500
  • Y for 1000
  • X Y for 2600
  • Bidder C values
  • X for 1000
  • Y for 1500
  • X Y for 2400
  • These values are shown in the table to the left

Y
Y
X
X
10
Sealed Bid vs. SACA Sealed Bid Outcome
  • In a sealed bid auction
  • Bidder As strategy is to bid
  • 1400 on X
  • 1300 on Y
  • This allows a profit even in the case where both
    leases are won
  • Bidder Bs strategy is to bid
  • 1300 on X
  • 900 on Y
  • Bidder Cs strategy is to bid
  • 800 on X
  • 1200 on Y
  • The result
  • Total profit 100

Y
Y
X
X
X Y For 2700
Y
X
None
None
11
Sealed Bid vs. SACA SACA Outcome
  • In an SACA auction, bidders can safely be more
    aggressive
  • Bidding starts at 800
  • Ties are broken at random
  • No further bids above 1500
  • Bidders A and C could observe the auction as it
    progressed
  • Because Bidder A could avoid the undesirable
    outcome of winning both leases, higher bids
    became safe
  • Because Bidder C could see that a 1200 bid could
    not win, a higher bid became strategically
    necessary
  • Higher efficiency means higher bidder profit

Y
Outcome
Y
X
X
Bought for 1500
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 4
Round 5
Round 6
Round 7
Round 8
Round 9
Round 10
Round 11
Round 12
Round 13
1200
1400
800
900
1000
1300
1500
800
800
900
1100
1500
800
900
900
1000
1100
1300
800
800
1000
1200
1400
Bought for 1500
12
Alkeras Auction Experience
Experience in complex, multi-billion auctions
with impressive results
New Jersey Market design and software
development for the simultaneous descending clock
auction run by electricity distributors
Singapore Market design and auction software
developed for the 3G auction organised by the
Infocomm Development Agency
Italy Market design and auction software
developed for the 3G mobile wireless and
Broadband spectrum auctions run by the Ministry
of Communications.
Guatemala Market design and auction software
developed for the Secretary of International
Communications
Canada Auction software developed for Industry
Spectrum Management Agency
Mexico Market design and auction software
developed for Commicion Federale de
Telecommunicaciones
U.S. Software and hosting for a US water auction
in one of the largest metropolitan markets of the
United Sates
Texas Market design and software for a
simultaneous ascending clock auction run by power
generating companies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com