Title: AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL ASP
1ASP WP ASP01-28Agenda Item 5.9 27 Nov 2006
AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL (ASP) Kobe,
November 2006 Agenda Items ______
Surveillance and Broadcast Services Program
Description Briefing Presented by John
Marksteiner
2Surveillance and Broadcast Services Program
Description
- Aeronautical Surveillance Panel (ASP) Working
Group Meeting, Kobe, Japan
By John Marksteiner Date November 6-15, 2006
3Agenda
- Background
- Initial Investment Decision
- Governance
- Objective
- Definition of Program
- Business Case Review
- Dual Track Approach
- Acquisition Status
- Rulemaking Status
- Summary
- Next Steps
4Background Initial Investment Decision
- On September 9, 2005 the JRC approved the initial
investment decision for Future Surveillance and
directed the team to seek a final investment
decision from the JRC by July 2006. The JRC also
approved establishing an ATO-level Surveillance
and Broadcast Services office that would be
responsible for coordinating and obtaining
funding to support the agency-wide resources
required to develop, implement, and manage the
ADS-B future surveillance services and systems.
5Background Program Governance
6Background Program Objective
- Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed,
performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with
the Next Generation Air Transportation System
(NGATS) vision and generates value for the
National Airspace System (NAS) - Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of
ADS-B Applications - Develop Application Life Cycle Management
Approach - Portfolio Management for Applications
- Requirements Management Across the Applications
- Performance Criteria Management
- Establish Infrastructure
- Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments
7Definition of Program Automatic Dependant
Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B)
- Automatic
- Periodically transmits information with no pilot
or operator input required - Dependent
- Position and velocity vector are derived from the
Global Positioning System (GPS) or a Flight
Management System (FMS) - Surveillance -
- A method of determining position of aircraft,
vehicles, or other asset - Broadcast
- Transmitted information available to anyone with
the appropriate receiving equipment
8Definition of Program Traffic Information
Service - Broadcast / Flight Information Service
- Broadcast
9Definition of Program Initial ADS-B Services and
Applications
10Definition of Program Final Investment Decision
- Segment 1
- The following recommendations were approved at
the June 7, 2006 JRC - Baseline FY07 and FY08 Costs only
- Return for Final Investment Decision for Balance
of Program prior to Contract Award (July 2007
Timeframe) - ATO Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Associate
Administrator for Aviation Safety (AVS)
Designation for Co-ISD Authority - Approve Investment Decision with Preliminary
Hazard Analysis (PHA) Action Item Tracked and
Closed through the JRC / EC Secretariat
11Definition of Program Segment 1 Schedule
12Definition of Program Proposed Schedule -
Segments 2 - 4
13Definition of Program Segment 1 Locations
- ADS-B service locations include the following
- Service Coverage Volume Southeast Alaska Juneau
Area - Service Delivery Point Anchorage Center and
Juneau Air Traffic Control Tower - Service Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B
- Service Coverage Volume Gulf of Mexico Area
- Service Delivery Point Houston Center and
Helicopter Operator Dispatch Center - Service Communication, Weather, Surveillance
- Service Coverage Volume Louisville (KY), Kansas
City (MO), Garden City (KS), and North Platte
(NE) Areas - Service Delivery Point Louisville TRACON and
UPS Airline Operations Center - Service Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B
- Service Coverage Volume Philadelphia, PA and
Ontario, CA Areas - Service Delivery Point Philadelphia TRACON and
UPS Airline Operation Center - Service Surveillance
- TIS-B / FIS-B expansion
- Existing east coast deployment will be expanded
westward into the Great Lakes Region - Phoenix/Prescott, AZ coverage will spread
westward to Central and Southern California
14Segment 1 Locations Expansion
15Segment 1 Locations (Continued)
Anchorage Center (ZAN)
Bethel Area
Southeast Alaska Juneau Area
16Business Case Review Segment 1 Economic Analysis
17Business Case Review Requested Baseline Costs
(M)
Requested Baseline Costs (Segment 1)
18Dual Track Strategy (Segment 1)
Ground Infrastructure
2/2006 11/2006
11/2006 7/2007
10/2009 4/2010
9/2010
1/2008 1/2009
4/2008 3/2010
Test Ground Infrastructure / Voluntary Avionics
Equipage
Deploy Ground Infrastructure
Initial Operating Capability
Acquisition Planning
In-Service Decision
Acquisition Execution
Pre-NPRM Separation Standards Modeling
Separation Standards Approval
9/2009
1/2007 8/2007
Avionics Equipage
Avionics Equipage Begins
RPR Phase I
RPR Phase 3
RPR Phase 2
Final Rule
NPRM
11/2009
12/2009
10/2007 4/2008
4/2006 9/2006
9/2007
In Process
19Acquisition FAA Life Cycle Management Process
CONOPS, ISP, and FPR Approved, May 2006
Final Investment Decision (Segment 1), June 2006
Initial Investment Decision, September 2005
RFI, September 2006
SIR, November 2006
Enhanced Surveillance Capability Mission Needs
Statement 326, May 2001
Final Investment Decision (Segment 2), February
2007
RFO, March 2007
Final Investment Decision (Remainder Segment 1
2), July 2007
Contract Award, July 2007
In Service Decision, September 2010
CONOPS Concept of Operations ISP Integrated
Safety Plan FPR Final Program Requirements
RFI Request for Information SIR Screening
Information Request RFO Request for Offer
20Rulemaking FAA Life Cycle Management Process
OPR identifies need for rulemaking
Approval of Phase I and Phase II RPR
Rulemaking team drafts NPRM
OST and OMB Review of NPRM
Federal Register Publishes NPRM
Approval of Phase III RPR
Rulemaking team drafts final rule
OST and OMB Review of Final Rule
Final Rule Published in Federal Register
21Interrelationship of Key Milestones
Segment 2 JRC
RFO
Contract Award
Backup Analysis
Final Rule
NPRM
In-Service Decision
Separation Standards Pre-NPRM Activity Lower
Risk from High to Medium
Separation Standards Post-NPRM Activity Lower
Risk from Medium to Retired
Key Site IOC
22Summary
- Program has transitioned from Research and
Development (R D) to Implementation - Segment 1 baseline established
- Dual track service acquisition and rulemaking
activities underway - Risk Mitigation plans in effect
- Governance Process
- Backup Analysis underway
- Separation Standards Workgroup established
- Specification coordination with industry and
international community
Success through a collaborative FAA / industry
relationship
23Next Steps
- Continue Working Closely with User Community
- Business Case
- Separation Standards
- Equipage Strategy
- Critical Milestones
- Complete Backup Analysis to Support
- NPRM
- Segment 2 JRC
- Finalize Acquisition Planning