Debt vs Equity

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Debt vs Equity

Description:

Debt vs Equity ... They are securities that have some characteristics of debt and some characteristics of equity. ... Company issues debt to a wholly owned trust. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: tyo8

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Debt vs Equity


1
Debt vs Equity
  • SFAS 150 Accounting for Certain Financial
    Instruments with Characteristics of Both
    Liabilities and Equity

2
Debt vs Equity
  • What do the following have in common?
  • Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
  • TOPRS (trust originated preferred stock)
  • Forward contracts on firms stock
  • They are securities that have some
    characteristics of debt and some characteristics
    of equity.
  • Some firms used to put them between liabilities
    and equity on the balance sheet (mezzanine),
    others used to put them in equity.

3
Redeemable preferred stock
  • Preferred stock allows for either mandatory
    redemption or redemption at the option of the
    holder.
  • In other words, the firm promises to pay back the
    preferred stock at a stated price in the future.
  • Is this debt or equity?

4
Liability vs Equity (CON6)
  • Equity or net assets is the residual interest in
    the assets of an entity that remains after
    deducting the liabilities.
  • Liabilities are probable future sacrifices of
    economic benefits arising from present
    obligations of a particular entity to transfer
    assets or provide services to other entities in
    the future as a result of past transactions or
    events.

5
Redeemable Preferred Stock
  • Characteristics of both
  • Fixed cumulative dividend payments are similar to
    interest payments.
  • Fixed redemption date and price are similar to
    principal payments for debt.
  • The SEC ruled that redeemable preferred stock is
    not equity, but did not state that is debt.
  • So, companies put the securities between
    liabilities and equity on the balance sheet
    mezzanine.

6
(No Transcript)
7
TOPRs (Trust Originated Preferred Stock)
  • Company issues debt to a wholly owned trust.
  • The trust issues preferred stock to investors and
    uses the proceeds of the issuance of the
    securities to purchase the debt from the company
    having a stated maturity.
  • When the company makes its payments of interest
    to the trust, the trust distributes the cash to
    the holders of the preferred stock.
  • The preferred securities must be redeemed upon
    maturity of the debt.
  • The company can record interest on debt (which is
    tax deductible) instead of dividends on stock
    (which is not).

8
How TOPRs work
divs
interest
Firm
Trust
Investors
loan
Buy stk.
bonds
Pfd. Stk.
9
TOPRs Debt or Equity?
  • Because the preferred stock in the trust is
    mandatorily redeemable, it cannot be equity
    (according to the SEC).
  • But not required to call it debt.
  • So firms put it in mezzanine.

10
General Motors
  • Trust Originated Preferred Shares

11
Forward contracts on firm stock
  • Firm sells a forward contract on its own stock.
  • The firm receives cash and promises to buy its
    own stock at a specified date and specified
    price.
  • Because it is a transaction with a current
    stockholder, it was required to be classified as
    equity (EITF 00-19)

12
SFAS 150 (issued in 2003)
  • Many investors were concerned (and confused)
    about the classification in the balance sheet of
    certain financial instruments that had
    characteristics of both liabilities and equity.
  • Some firms classified these as equity and some as
    mezzanine.

13
SFAS 150
  • Requires liability classification of
  • Mandatorily redeemable shares
  • Any obligations to repurchase the firms own
    shares
  • Unconditional obligations in which the issuer
    must or may settle by issuing a variable number
    of its equity shares if
  • Fixed monetary amount known
  • Varies in something other than the FV of the
    equity shares (e.g.. Index to SP 500)
  • Varies inversely with FV of issuers equity shares

14
SFAS 150
  • What do the following have in common?
  • Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
  • TOPRS (trust originated preferred stock)
  • Forward contracts on firms stock
  • They are all liabilities according to SFAS 150.

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Effect on Ratios
  • Firearms Training Systems, Inc.
  • Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock

18
But wait
  • SFAS 150 says that an obligation that is settled
    by issuing a variable number of equity shares is
    a liability.
  • That doesnt meet the definition of a liability
    under CON6
  • Liabilities are probable future sacrifices of
    economic benefits arising from present
    obligations of a particular entity to transfer
    assets or provide services to other entities in
    the future as a result of past transactions or
    events.
  • SFAS 150 states that FASB will amend CON6 to
    include equity issuances in the definition of a
    liability.

19
What is the effect of SFAS 150?
  • Many of these securities have gone away
  • On April 2, 2001, GM redeemed the series G
    Trusts sole assets causing the series G trust to
    redeem the approximate 5 million outstanding
    series G 9.87 trust originated preferred shares
    (TOPRs).
  • GMs 2001 10-K

20
But the FASB isnt finished..
  • The FASB, in a joint project with the IASB, is
    working on a comprehensive standard of accounting
    for instruments with characteristics of
    liabilities and equity.
  • Develop a conceptual framework for the
    accounting.
  • In the meantime, financial institutions are
    developing contracts that do not meet the
    criteria in SFAS 150 so that they are not
    considered liabilities structuring transactions
    around the new rules.

21
Debt versus Equity?
  • Convertible Bonds

22
Convertible Bonds
  • Convertible bonds are recorded like regular bonds
    the proceeds of the bonds are reported in Bonds
    Payable.
  • On January 15, 2007 Malley Inc issued 1,000
    bonds at par value. The bonds were convertible
    into 200 shares of stock. The par value of the
    stock is 1 per share and the market value is 7
    per share.

23
When issue the bonds.
  • Cash 1000
  • Bonds Payable 1000
  • Notice that the bonds are recorded as if the
    entire value derives from the bond and no value
    derives from the convertibility feature.

24
Convertible Bonds VerticalNet
  • In 1999, to raise capital, VerticalNet offered
    for sale 100 million face value of convertible
    bonds. They had a stated (annual) rate of 5.25
    and were due in 5 years. The bonds (1,000
    denominations) were convertible into 50 shares of
    common stock.
  • The bonds (like most convertible debt) were
    callable by the issuer at a fixed price prior to
    maturity, but if called, bondholders have the
    right to exercise their conversion option first
    if they want.

25
VerticalNet Convertible Bonds
  • 100 million face value bonds with a stated rate
    of 5.25 and due in 5 years, each 1,000 bond is
    convertible into 50 shares of common stock.
  • At the time of issuance, the market rate for
    similar debt was 8 per year and VerticalNets
    stock was trading at approximately 16 per share.
  • Note that the conversion price was fixed at 20
    per share (1,000 bond / 50 shares 20 per
    share).
  • What proceeds should VerticalNet receive for the
    bonds?

26
VerticalNet Convertible Bonds
  • What should the bond proceeds be?
  • PV(8,5) 100 PVA(8,5)5.25 89.02
  • VerticalNet actually received full face value
    for the bonds. How do you interpret this?
  • The convertible feature of the bond was very
    valuable (11 million)!
  • Should VerticalNet have recorded the bonds at
    face value or at the present value of the
    promised cash flows at the prevailing market
    rate?

27
The FASB..
  • APB 14 says that the bonds are to be recorded at
    the amount of proceeds. So, all the value is
    attributable to the bonds.
  • However, an argument could be made for separately
    reporting the two (or three) separate financial
    instruments represented by the convertible bonds.

28
VerticalNet
  • Suppose the bonds were recorded at par and the
    effective interest rate of 5.25 were used to
    record interest expense. (Note that the US
    governments borrowing rate for debt of similar
    duration in late 1999 was 5.9.)
  • How well does the interest expense represent the
    cost of borrowing to VerticalNet?

29
VerticalNet
  • 5.25 recorded rate
  • Carrying value x effective rate 100 x 5.25
    5.25
  • 8 market rate
  • Carrying value x effective rate 89 x 8
    7.12
  • Interest expense is understated relative to the
    cost of the bond itself.

30
Yahoo!
  • In April 2003, Yahoo! Inc. sold 750 million of
    zero coupon convertible notes due in 2008 and
    received full face value for them. What will
    Yahoos interest expense be in each year?
  • Interest expense would be zero.
  • Recall that interest expense typically equals the
    cash payment for interest plus or minus the
    amortization of the discount or the premium.
    Normally zero coupon bonds have a very large
    discount to be amortized, but in this
    circumstance, there would be no cash payment nor
    amortization and, therefore, no interest expense
    recorded. This clearly will lead to
    misrepresented financial performance for Yahoo.

31
Yahoo!
  • How well does Yahoos recorded 750 million of
    debt represent the effects of the financing on
    Yahoos financial position?
  • The balance sheet will report 750 million in
    debt when, in fact, this is really 750 in
    options on common stock which would ordinarily be
    reported in equity. Calling it debt is
    misleading.

32
Convertible Debt
  • FASB has the issue of convertible debt included
    in Phase II of the Debt/Equity project.
  • IASB have separated convertible securities into
    their components since 1996.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)