Stereotypes of the Homeless: PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 11
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stereotypes of the Homeless:


1
Stereotypes of the Homeless The Targets
Perspective Carolyn Weisz, Psychology Renée
Houston, Communication Studies University of
Puget Sound Contact cweisz_at_ups.edu. Please do
not cite without permission of authors. Student
Assistants Carrie Clark, Karen Czerniak, Sonia
Ivancic, Tom Van Heuvelen, Alex Westcoat,
Natalie Whitlock, Jenny Yu Supported by The
Pierce County Road Home Leadership Team and the
Boeing Company
2
Introduction
  • Homeless individuals face potential health and
    safety risks, and they are also the targets of
    social stigma. Research suggests that attitudes
    toward homeless people are extremely negative
    (e.g., Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, Xu, 2002 Harris
    Fiske, 2006 Phelan, Link, Moore Stueve, 1997).
    As part of an interdisciplinary project on
    homelessness in Pierce County, WA, this research
    examined homeless peoples own perceptions of
    their group as well as their beliefs about how
    their group is perceived by others. Homeless
    individuals beliefs about negative attitudes
    others hold toward them are important to
    understand because these beliefs may affect job-
    and help-seeking behaviors, and other variables
    related to well-being. We predicted that these
    beliefs would be quite negative, and,
    specifically, more negative than homeless
    individuals own beliefs about their group and
    than perceptions reported by individuals with
    homes.

3
Introduction
  • Homeless individuals face potential health and
    safety risks, and they are also the targets of
    social stigma. Research suggests that attitudes
    toward homeless people are extremely negative
    (e.g., Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, Xu, 2002 Harris
    Fiske, 2006 Phelan, Link, Moore Stueve, 1997).
    As part of an interdisciplinary project on
    homelessness in Pierce County, WA, this research
    examined homeless peoples own perceptions of
    their group as well as their beliefs about how
    their group is perceived by others. Homeless
    individuals beliefs about negative attitudes
    others hold toward them are important to
    understand because these beliefs may affect job-
    and help-seeking behaviors, and other variables
    related to well-being. We predicted that these
    beliefs would be quite negative, and,
    specifically, more negative than homeless
    individuals own beliefs about their group and
    than perceptions reported by individuals with
    homes.

4
Participants and Methods
  • Homeless Sample
  • 214 homeless adults (116 men and 98 women)
    recruited at many locations throughout Pierce
    County, WA, completed surveys orally or in
    writing. They received a 20 gift card.
  • Age 19-65 years.
  • Race 55 White, 21 Black, 8 Native American,
    5 Hispanic, 1 Asian, 10 Mixed or Other.
  • 43 reported having a diagnosed mental illness.
    44 reported a drug or alcohol addiction. 30
    reported currently using drugs or alcohol on a
    regular basis.
  • Comparison Sample
  • 50 business leaders and residents were recruited
    from three sources a master mailing list of
    Pierce County businesses, the Qwest-dex phone
    book, and a list of citizens who had participated
    in a survey on attitudes on an Affordable Housing
    Levy. Participants completed a survey prior to
    engaging in focus group discussions on
    homelessness. They received 50.

5
Stereotype Measure
  • Homeless and non-homeless participants indicated
    whether they thought five statements representing
    negative stereotypes about the homeless were true
    or false.
  • Most of the homeless are drug addicts or
    alcoholics.
  • Most of the homeless do not want to work.
  • The homeless are largely responsible for petty
    crime.
  • Large homeless populations create fear and danger
    in communities.
  • Most homeless people dont want to be helped.
  • Homeless participants also indicated the answer
    that they thought non-homeless individuals would
    choose most often for each item, and answered a
    battery of other measures.

6
Table 1. True Responses to Statements about
Homeless People
7
Results
  • Our primary analyses compared the sum of true
    responses for the five items for the homeless
    participants (alpha .57), the homeless
    participants beliefs about the outgroup
    responses (alpha .88), and the non-homeless
    participants (alpha .53). As expected,
    homeless participants thought outgroup members
    would endorse significantly more items as true
    than outgroup members actually endorsed, t(251)
    8.49, p lt .001, and than homeless individuals
    endorsed as true themselves, t(191) 16.08, p lt
    .05 (See Table 1). The mean number of items
    actually endorsed by homeless and non-homeless
    individuals did not differ, t(243) .94, p
    .35.
  • Analyses of individual items were conducted
    using chi-square and McNemar tests. For the four
    items that involved negative characteristics of
    homeless people, the frequency of true responses
    was higher for homeless individuals perceptions
    of the outgroups responses than for their own
    beliefs, ps lt .001, and the actual beliefs
    reported by the non-homeless, ps lt .001.
    Homeless and non-homeless individuals own
    responses did not differ for these items, ps gt
    .10.

8
  • For the single item describing beliefs about
    the effects of homeless individuals on the
    community (i.e., create fear and danger),
    homeless individuals beliefs about the responses
    of the non-homeless and the non-homeless own
    responses did not differ, p gt .10, and were both
    higher than homeless individuals own beliefs, p lt
    .001.
  • Exploratory analyses revealed that the
    responses of the homeless sample did not vary by
    gender, but that White homeless participants
    thought the outgroup had more negative
    impressions of the homeless than did non-White
    homeless participants, F(1, 175) 21.62, p lt
    .001. There were no effects of race or gender
    for homeless individuals own responses.

9
Discussion
  • Our findings suggest that homeless individuals
    believe that they are viewed quite negatively by
    those who do not share their homeless status.
    Moreover, they perceive these negative
    stereotypes as more extreme than the views they
    hold themselves about homeless individuals as a
    group. These findings add to the larger
    literature on stigma which examines perceptions
    of discrimination from the targets perspective
    (e.g., Levin van Laar, 2006 Major OBrien,
    2005).
  • We also found that homeless peoples
    perceptions of negative stereotypes held about
    them are more negative than the perceptions
    reported by a sample of non-homeless individuals
    from the same community. It is difficult to
    discern whether this difference reflects
    inaccurate perceptions held by the homeless or
    reporting biases by the non-homeless. The fact
    that non-homeless individuals were more willing
    to endorse a statement about the negative effect
    of homeless people on the community than
    statements about negative characteristics of
    homeless people suggests that some form of social
    desirability bias or modern prejudice (e.g.,
    Gaertner Dovidio, 1986) may indeed be present.

10
  • Regardless of the accuracy of perceptions by
    homeless people about the negative attitudes
    others hold about them, these beliefs may have
    important practical consequences. Our ongoing
    research will examine links between homeless
    peoples perceptions of stigma and outcomes
    related to well-being and behavior. For example,
    individuals who fear negative judgment or
    treatment may be less likely to apply for jobs,
    join community organizations, or seek help or
    services.

11
References
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., Xu,
    J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype
    content Content and warmth respectively follow
    from perceived status and competition. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The
    aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio S. L.
    Gaertner (Eds.) Prejudice,
  • discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San
    Diego Academic Press.
  • Harris, L. H., Fiske, S. T. (2006).
    Dehumanizing the lowest of the low Neuroimaging
    responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological
    Science, 17, 847-853.
  • Levin, S., van Laar, C. (Eds.) (2006). Stigma
    and group inequality Social psychological
    perspectives. Mahway, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Major, B., OBrien, L. T. (2005). The social
    psychology of stigma. Annual Review of
    Psychology, 56, 393-421.
  • Phelan, j. C., Link, B. G., Moore, R. E.,
    Stueve, A. (1997). The stigma of homelessness
    The impact of the label homeless on attitudes
    toward poor persons. Social Psychology Quarterly,
    60, 323-337.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com