A CMS Approach at NC State University Libraries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

A CMS Approach at NC State University Libraries

Description:

Commercial Open Source DIY ? ... Essentially results in DIY scenario. Potential exists for final product ending up incomplete ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: stevemccan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A CMS Approach at NC State University Libraries


1
A CMS Approach at NC State University Libraries
  • Computers in Libraries
  • March 10, 2004

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
2
Agenda
  • Steve McCann
  • CMS Investigation Background and Overview
  • May Chang
  • CMS Application
  • Questions and Answers
  • CMS Handout

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
3
The Challenge of Managing Content
  • All happy families resemble one another, but
    each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.
  • Leo Tolstoy.
    Anna Karenina.

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
4
NCSU Libraries Website Environment
  • 15,000 static HTML files, managed informally
  • Large number of contributors
  • Includes department pages, general and services
    information, research guides, course pages,
    information literacy instruction modules, staff
    home pages, etc.
  • Site includes redundant elements
  • Includes hours, ask-a-librarian links, branding,
    etc.
  • Website redesign in progress
  • The system is not broken but could be improved.

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
5
CMS An Overview of Benefits
  • Ideally, a CMS should
  • Simplify the management of the web site
  • Empower a wide range of contributors while
    maintaining look and feel
  • Allow change to both layout and style
  • Provide Security, user management, versioning,
    workflow
  • Schedule content publishing and expiration
  • Allow multiple publishing channels, both in and
    out

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
6
The Full Web CMS
Non-CMS db
Connector Code
Contributors
Web Server
HTML files
CMS
Main CMS db
XML RSS
Connector Code
CMS- generated db
  • A CMS can stand behind all the static and dynamic
    parts of the website
  • Boiko, p.76

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
7
A CMS Process at NCSU Libraries
  • CMS Investigation Project Team
  • Getting up to speed for participants
  • Tested several CMS solutions
  • Talked to other libraries using CMS
  • Received commercial demo
  • Final report presented in early 2004
  • Pilot project

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
8
CMS Investigation Project Team
  • Weeding Decisions before Selection
  • Commercial Open Source DIY ?
  • Wait to participate in campus-wide adoption of
    portal technology?
  • Does solution mesh with libraries appropriate
    technology?

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
9
Libraries Appropriate Technology
  • Production Environment
  • Oracle and Sun Solaris
  • Variety of servers, middleware and databases
  • Skill Sets
  • Java, Perl, php, ColdFusion
  • MySql and other OSS technologies

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
10
CMS Solutions Reviewed / Considered
  • Apache Lenya http//cocoon.apache.org/lenya/
  • ZopePlone http//www.zope.org/
  • SiteExecutive http//www.siteexecutive.com/
  • OpenCMS http//www.opencms.org/
  • Magnolia http//www.obinary.com/en/magnolia.html

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
11
CMS Investigation Findings 1 of 5
Commercial CMS Solutions
  • Pros
  • Support, documentation, training, and service
    level agreements
  • Would likely be faster to implement
  • Perceived sense of safety
  • Safest bet if resources are available to purchase
  • Cons
  • Licensing can be expensive
  • Customization/integration and maintenance
    expenses
  • Vendor sets priorities and schedules for feature
    requests

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
12
CMS Investigation Findings 2 of 5
Open Source CMS Solutions
  • Pros
  • Significantly cheaper without the licensing fee
    line item
  • Code is accessible
  • Community developed add-ons
  • Options for hosting (outsource, in-house, or
    combination)
  • Widest selection of hosting platforms
  • Cons
  • Uncertaintyproduct support, documentation,
    training
  • Flip side of flexibility can be a challenging
    complexity
  • Enterprise-grade workflow difficult to achieve
  • Implementation times can be lengthy
  • Portion of licensing-fee savings redirected to
    development expertise

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
13
CMS Investigation Findings 3 of 5
Custom CMS based on an OSS framework
  • Pros
  • Opportunity to create a customized, branded
    solution specific to requirements
  • Commercial support available Opportunity for
    the best of OSS and Commercial
  • Proven, solid framework
  • Cons
  • Similar cons to other OSS solutions
  • Required functionality will need to be built if
    not already available
  • Customization introduces added concern of taxing
    internal development resources, which can further
    delay implementation and increase product support
    demands

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
14
CMS Investigation Findings 4 of 5
Building from Scratch ( DIY )
  • Pros
  • Results in a system that is specifically
    tailored to needs
  • Cons
  • Difficult to estimate initial and ongoing
    investment
  • Heavy dependency on development staff
  • Difficult to keep up with feature requests
  • Various field experts caution against this
    approach

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
15
CMS Investigation Findings 5 of 5
Extend Existing Web Publishing Model
  • Pros
  • Least invasive option not dramatically
    different from current practice
  • Opportunity to formalize workflow and editorial
    process
  • Opportunity to standardize editing tools
  • Cons
  • CMS functionality, such as workflow,
    transformations, etc., would need to be developed
    in-house
  • Essentially results in DIY scenario
  • Potential exists for final product ending up
    incomplete

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
16
CMS Solutions Reviewed / Considered
  • Apache Lenya http//cocoon.apache.org/lenya/
  • ZopePlone http//www.zope.org/
  • SiteExecutive http//www.siteexecutive.com/
  • OpenCMS http//www.opencms.org/
  • Magnolia http//www.obinary.com/en/magnolia.html

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
17
References
  • Boiko, Bob. Content Management Bible. New York
    Hungry Minds, 2002.
  • A CMS Approach at NCSU Libraries can be found at
  • http//www.lib.ncsu.edu/presentations/cil2004/

Computers in Libraries 2004
May Chang,
Steve McCann

2004.03.10
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com