Pore Structure Analysis of Advanced Pharmaceutical Products PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 48
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pore Structure Analysis of Advanced Pharmaceutical Products


1
Pore Structure Analysis of Advanced
Pharmaceutical Products
  • Dr. Akshaya Jena and Dr. Krishna
  • Porous Materials, Inc.
  • 83 Brown Road, Ithaca, NY 14850

2
Topics
  • Importance of Porosity in Advanced Pharmaceutical
    Products
  • Inadequacy of Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry
  • Two novel techniques
  • Results and Discussion
  • Summary and Conclusion

3
Importance of Porosity in Advanced Pharmaceutical
Products
  • Advanced pharmaceutical products
  • Examples
  • Artificial skin
  • Blood clotting material
  • Dialysis membrane
  • Blood delivery system
  • Hydrogels
  • Tissue culture substrates
  • And many more

4
  • Performance and efficiency of such products
  • ?
  • Pore characteristics
  • Important characteristics
  • Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier
    properties
  • The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
    properties
  • Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow

5
  • Performance and efficiency of such products
  • ?
  • Pore characteristics
  • Important characteristics
  • Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier
    properties
  • The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
    properties
  • Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
  • Pore distribution ? Barrier flow

6
  • Performance and efficiency of such products
  • ?
  • Pore characteristics
  • Important characteristics
  • Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier properties
  • The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
    properties
  • Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
  • Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
  • Pore volume ? Holding capacity

7
  • Performance and efficiency of such products
  • ?
  • Pore characteristics
  • Important characteristics
  • Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier properties
  • The largest pore diameter ? Barrier properties
  • Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
  • Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
  • Pore volume ? Holding capacity
  • Permeability ? Rate of the process

8
  • Performance and efficiency of such products
  • ?
  • Pore characteristics
  • Important characteristics
  • Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier properties
  • The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
    properties Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
  • Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
  • Pore volume ? Holding capacity
  • Permeability ? Rate of the process
  • Need for reliable, accurate and safe techniques

9
Inadequacy of Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry
  • Mercury intrusion porosimetry often used for pore
    structure analysis

Principle of mercury intrusion porosimetry
10
  • Mercury is forced in to pores
  • Intrusion volume gives pore volume
  • Pressure yields pore size, D
  • D - 4g cos q /p
  • g surface tension of Hgq contact angle of
    HgP differential pressure

11
  • It cannot measure
  • Constricted pore diameter
  • The largest pore diameter
  • Permeability
  • High pressure used in this technique can damage
    pore structure of the delicate products
  • Uses toxic mercury, creates health hazards,
    pollutes environment, and makes samples unusable

12
Novel Techniques
  • Capillary Flow Porometery
  • Pores of sample spontaneously filled with wetting
    liquid
  • Pressurized gas is used to remove liquid from
    pores to allow gas flow

13
  • Pressure yields pore diameter, D
  • D 4 g cos q/p
  • g surface tension of wetting liquidq
    contact angle of wetting liquid P differential
    pressure
  • Pressure and flow rates through wet and dry
    samples are used to compute properties
  • The PMI Capillary Flow Porometer used in this
    investigation

14
  • The PMI Capillary Flow Porometer

15
Liquid Extrusion Porosimetry
  • Sample is placed on a membrane whose largest pore
    size is smaller than the smallest in the sample

16
Liquid Extrusion Porosimetry
  • Pores of sample and membrane are filled with a
    wetting liquid

17
Liquid Extrusion Porosimetry
  • Pressurized gas is used to displace liquid from
    pores without the membrane and with membrane
    under the sample

18
  • Pressure yields pore diameter
  • D 4 g cos q/p
  • D pore diameterg surface tension of wetting
    liquid q contact angle of wetting liquidP
    differential pressure
  • Volume of displaced liquid gives pore volume
    permeability

19
  • The PMI Liquid Extrusion Porosimeter used in this
    investigation

20
Advantages
  • All required properties measurable
  • Use of low pressure-Samples not damaged
  • No toxic materials use
  • -no health hazard
  • -no environmental pollution
  • -no sample contamination

21
Results and Discussion
  • Dialysis membranes
  • Requirements
  • Primary function-Filtration
  • Important characteristics
  • The largest pore diameter
  • Mean pore diameter
  • Pore distribution
  • Flow rate

22
Capillary Flow Porometery
  • Flow rate vs Differential pressure for dry and
    wet samples

23
  • Pore diameter ? from measured pressures
  • The largest pore diameter ? from pressure
    for flow initiation
    ? 1.023 mm
  • Mean flow pore diameter ? from mean flow
    pressure ? 0.458 mm

24
  • Pore distribution
  • Normalized pore distribution function vs. pore
    diameter

25
  • Pore distribution
  • In any pore size range ? area flow through
    pores in the range

26
  • Pore distribution
  • Almost 80 flow ? through 0.2 0.7 mm pores

27
  • Permeability
  • Dry curve yields gas permeability
  • Liquid permeability measurable using attachments
  • Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Cannot measure any
    of the these properties

28
Conclusion
  • All required properties including very small pore
    diameters were measured by capillary flow
    porometry, although mercury intrusion technique
    could not measure any of the properties.
  • Pressures required was only about 50 psi
  • No toxic material was used
  • Capillary flow porometry was the appropriate
    technique

29
Artificial skin
  • Requirements
  • Primary function-allow growth of blood vessels
    and be breathable
  • Pores are much larger than the pore providing
    barrier properties
  • Pore size distribution are in the range for
    blood vessels to grow
  • Adequate gas and vapor permeability to be
    breathable.

30
Capillary Flow Porometry
  • Flow rate vs Differential pressure for dry and
    wet samples

31
  • Pore diameter ? from measured pressures
  • The largest pore diameter ? from pressure
    for flow initiation ? 74.932
    mm
  • Mean flow pore diameter ? from mean flow
    pressure ? 31.489 mm

32
  • Pore distribution

Normalized pore distribution function vs pore
diameter
  • A broad pore range
  • Uniform distribution

33
  • Permeability
  • Appreciable gas permeation shown by dry curve
  • Flow through dry curve as a function of
    differential pressure

34
  • Mercury Intrusion Porosimetery Cannot measure any
    of the these properties

35
Conclusion
  • Large constricted pore diameters, broad
    distribution and permeability were measured by
    capillary flow poromerty, although mercury
    intrusion technique could not measure any of
    these properties.
  • Pressures required was only about 3 psi
  • No toxic material was used
  • Capillary flow porometry was the appropriate
    technique

36
Hydrogels
  • Requirements
  • Primary applications
  • Dressings
  • Wound gels
  • Burn dressings
  • Electrodes
  • Skin disorders treatments
  • Carriers for hormones and drugs
  • Drug delivery implants

37
Hydrogels
  • Requirements
  • Properties
  • Pore volumes ? liquid holding capacity
  • Pore size distribution ? flow rates
    barrier
    property
  • Liquid permeability ? rate of the process

38
Hydrogels
  • Requirements
  • Properties
  • Pore volumes ? liquid holding capacity
  • Pore size distribution ? flow rates
    barrier
    property
  • Liquid permeability ? rate of the process
  • Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry In Appropriate
  • Hydrogels retain their integrity only in water
  • Therefore, mercury intrusion extrusion
    porosimetry can be used

39
Hydrogels
  • Requirements
  • Properties
  • Pore volumes ? liquid holding capacity
  • Pore size distribution ? flow rates
    barrier
    property
  • Liquid permeability ? rate of the process
  • Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry in Appropriate
  • Hydrogels retain their integrity only in water
  • Therefore, mercury intrusion extrusion
    porosimetry can be used
  • Liquid extrusion Porosimetry
  • Water extrusion porosimetry appropriate

40
Pore volume of hydrogel
  • Pore volume
  • Total pore volume ? 0.421 cm 3/g
  • Porosity ? 67.12
  • Pressure only about 5 psi

41
  • Pore volume distribution
  • Pore distribution of hydrogel
  • For a given range Area pore volume
  • Pores have a narrow range ? 5-20 mm

42
  • Liquid permeability
  • The flow rate yields liquid permeability
  • Typical plot of flow rate of water vs pressure

43
Summary and Conclusion
  • 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
    flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry
  • 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
    diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
    pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
    pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
    gas permeability.

44
Summary and Conclusion
  • 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
    flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry
  • 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
    diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
    pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
    pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
    gas permeability.

3. These techniques used low pressures so that
sample damage was minimized.
45
Summary and Conclusion
  • 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
    flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry
  • 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
    diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
    pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
    pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
    gas permeability.
  • 3. These techniques used low pressures so that
    sample damage was minimized.

4. No toxic and harmful material was used.
46
Summary and Conclusion
  • 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
    flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry
  • 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
    diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
    pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
    pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
    gas permeability.
  • 3. These techniques used low pressures so that
    sample damage was minimized.
  • 4. No toxic and harmful material was used.

5. Products like hydrogels, which retain their
integrity in only certain liquid environments,
could be tested.
47
Summary and Conclusion
  • 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
    diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
    pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
    pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
    gas permeability.
  • 3. These techniques used low pressures so that
    sample damage was minimized.
  • 4. No toxic and harmful material was used.
  • 5. Products like hydrogels, which retain their
    integrity in only certain liquid environments,
    could be tested.

6. Mercury intrusion could not used for such
measurements.
48
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com