Title: Pore Structure Analysis of Advanced Pharmaceutical Products
1Pore Structure Analysis of Advanced
Pharmaceutical Products
- Dr. Akshaya Jena and Dr. Krishna
- Porous Materials, Inc.
- 83 Brown Road, Ithaca, NY 14850
2Topics
- Importance of Porosity in Advanced Pharmaceutical
Products - Inadequacy of Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry
- Two novel techniques
- Results and Discussion
- Summary and Conclusion
3Importance of Porosity in Advanced Pharmaceutical
Products
- Advanced pharmaceutical products
- Examples
- Artificial skin
- Blood clotting material
- Dialysis membrane
- Blood delivery system
- Hydrogels
- Tissue culture substrates
- And many more
4- Performance and efficiency of such products
- ?
- Pore characteristics
- Important characteristics
- Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier
properties - The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
properties - Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
5- Performance and efficiency of such products
- ?
- Pore characteristics
- Important characteristics
- Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier
properties - The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
properties - Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
- Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
6- Performance and efficiency of such products
- ?
- Pore characteristics
- Important characteristics
- Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier properties
- The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
properties - Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
- Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
- Pore volume ? Holding capacity
7- Performance and efficiency of such products
- ?
- Pore characteristics
- Important characteristics
- Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier properties
- The largest pore diameter ? Barrier properties
- Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow
- Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
- Pore volume ? Holding capacity
- Permeability ? Rate of the process
8- Performance and efficiency of such products
- ?
- Pore characteristics
- Important characteristics
- Constricted pore diameter ? Barrier properties
- The largest pore diameter ? Barrier
properties Mean pore diameter ? Barrier flow - Pore distribution ? Barrier flow
- Pore volume ? Holding capacity
- Permeability ? Rate of the process
- Need for reliable, accurate and safe techniques
9Inadequacy of Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry
- Mercury intrusion porosimetry often used for pore
structure analysis
Principle of mercury intrusion porosimetry
10- Mercury is forced in to pores
- Intrusion volume gives pore volume
- Pressure yields pore size, D
- D - 4g cos q /p
- g surface tension of Hgq contact angle of
HgP differential pressure
11- Constricted pore diameter
- The largest pore diameter
- Permeability
- High pressure used in this technique can damage
pore structure of the delicate products - Uses toxic mercury, creates health hazards,
pollutes environment, and makes samples unusable
12Novel Techniques
- Capillary Flow Porometery
- Pores of sample spontaneously filled with wetting
liquid - Pressurized gas is used to remove liquid from
pores to allow gas flow
13- Pressure yields pore diameter, D
- D 4 g cos q/p
- g surface tension of wetting liquidq
contact angle of wetting liquid P differential
pressure - Pressure and flow rates through wet and dry
samples are used to compute properties - The PMI Capillary Flow Porometer used in this
investigation
14- The PMI Capillary Flow Porometer
15Liquid Extrusion Porosimetry
- Sample is placed on a membrane whose largest pore
size is smaller than the smallest in the sample
16Liquid Extrusion Porosimetry
- Pores of sample and membrane are filled with a
wetting liquid
17Liquid Extrusion Porosimetry
- Pressurized gas is used to displace liquid from
pores without the membrane and with membrane
under the sample
18- Pressure yields pore diameter
- D 4 g cos q/p
- D pore diameterg surface tension of wetting
liquid q contact angle of wetting liquidP
differential pressure - Volume of displaced liquid gives pore volume
permeability
19- The PMI Liquid Extrusion Porosimeter used in this
investigation
20Advantages
- All required properties measurable
- Use of low pressure-Samples not damaged
- No toxic materials use
- -no health hazard
- -no environmental pollution
- -no sample contamination
21Results and Discussion
- Dialysis membranes
- Requirements
- Primary function-Filtration
- Important characteristics
- The largest pore diameter
- Mean pore diameter
- Pore distribution
- Flow rate
22Capillary Flow Porometery
- Flow rate vs Differential pressure for dry and
wet samples
23- Pore diameter ? from measured pressures
- The largest pore diameter ? from pressure
for flow initiation
? 1.023 mm - Mean flow pore diameter ? from mean flow
pressure ? 0.458 mm
24- Normalized pore distribution function vs. pore
diameter
25- In any pore size range ? area flow through
pores in the range
26- Almost 80 flow ? through 0.2 0.7 mm pores
27- Dry curve yields gas permeability
- Liquid permeability measurable using attachments
- Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Cannot measure any
of the these properties
28Conclusion
- All required properties including very small pore
diameters were measured by capillary flow
porometry, although mercury intrusion technique
could not measure any of the properties. - Pressures required was only about 50 psi
- No toxic material was used
- Capillary flow porometry was the appropriate
technique
29Artificial skin
- Requirements
- Primary function-allow growth of blood vessels
and be breathable - Pores are much larger than the pore providing
barrier properties - Pore size distribution are in the range for
blood vessels to grow - Adequate gas and vapor permeability to be
breathable.
30Capillary Flow Porometry
- Flow rate vs Differential pressure for dry and
wet samples
31- Pore diameter ? from measured pressures
- The largest pore diameter ? from pressure
for flow initiation ? 74.932
mm - Mean flow pore diameter ? from mean flow
pressure ? 31.489 mm
32Normalized pore distribution function vs pore
diameter
- A broad pore range
- Uniform distribution
33- Appreciable gas permeation shown by dry curve
- Flow through dry curve as a function of
differential pressure
34- Mercury Intrusion Porosimetery Cannot measure any
of the these properties
35Conclusion
- Large constricted pore diameters, broad
distribution and permeability were measured by
capillary flow poromerty, although mercury
intrusion technique could not measure any of
these properties. - Pressures required was only about 3 psi
- No toxic material was used
- Capillary flow porometry was the appropriate
technique
36Hydrogels
- Requirements
- Primary applications
- Dressings
- Wound gels
- Burn dressings
- Electrodes
- Skin disorders treatments
- Carriers for hormones and drugs
- Drug delivery implants
37Hydrogels
- Requirements
- Properties
- Pore volumes ? liquid holding capacity
- Pore size distribution ? flow rates
barrier
property - Liquid permeability ? rate of the process
38Hydrogels
- Requirements
- Properties
- Pore volumes ? liquid holding capacity
- Pore size distribution ? flow rates
barrier
property - Liquid permeability ? rate of the process
- Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry In Appropriate
- Hydrogels retain their integrity only in water
- Therefore, mercury intrusion extrusion
porosimetry can be used
39Hydrogels
- Requirements
- Properties
- Pore volumes ? liquid holding capacity
- Pore size distribution ? flow rates
barrier
property - Liquid permeability ? rate of the process
- Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry in Appropriate
- Hydrogels retain their integrity only in water
- Therefore, mercury intrusion extrusion
porosimetry can be used
- Liquid extrusion Porosimetry
- Water extrusion porosimetry appropriate
40Pore volume of hydrogel
- Pore volume
- Total pore volume ? 0.421 cm 3/g
- Porosity ? 67.12
- Pressure only about 5 psi
41- Pore distribution of hydrogel
- For a given range Area pore volume
- Pores have a narrow range ? 5-20 mm
42- The flow rate yields liquid permeability
- Typical plot of flow rate of water vs pressure
43Summary and Conclusion
- 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry - 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
gas permeability.
44Summary and Conclusion
- 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry - 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
gas permeability.
3. These techniques used low pressures so that
sample damage was minimized.
45Summary and Conclusion
- 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry - 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
gas permeability. - 3. These techniques used low pressures so that
sample damage was minimized.
4. No toxic and harmful material was used.
46Summary and Conclusion
- 1. Two novel techniques discussed. Capillary
flow porometry Liquid extrusion porosimetry - 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
gas permeability. - 3. These techniques used low pressures so that
sample damage was minimized. - 4. No toxic and harmful material was used.
5. Products like hydrogels, which retain their
integrity in only certain liquid environments,
could be tested.
47Summary and Conclusion
- 2. These techniques measured constricted pore
diameter, the largest pore diameter, mean flow
pore diameter, flow distribution, pore volume,
pore volume distribution, liquid permeability and
gas permeability. - 3. These techniques used low pressures so that
sample damage was minimized. - 4. No toxic and harmful material was used.
- 5. Products like hydrogels, which retain their
integrity in only certain liquid environments,
could be tested.
6. Mercury intrusion could not used for such
measurements.
48Thank You