Title: Medical Ethics and Patients Rights
1Medical Ethics and Patients Rights
2Areas of Interest
- Human research and patients rights
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Genetic screening
- Conflicts of interest and commercial gain
- Science Meets Religion
3Overview Human Testing
Overview Human Testing
- Legal obligations surrounding bodily materials,
residual diagnostic specimens, and private
information - If research doesnt involve living humans you
still have to uphold the rules why? - The Charts
- Human research ethics - commentary
4(No Transcript)
5Joe and the New Scopes Trial
- Many upset over an evolutionary monopoly
- Result of 1987 Supreme court ruling
- Intelligent Design
- Equal treatment between evolution v. creationism?
6Joe and the New Scopes Trial
- Possible questions to be answered
- Should faith based education still have an
influence? - Science v. Religion, whats the proper balance?
- Outlaw public schools?
7Medical Ethics, Patients Rights, and Religious
Issues
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis
- Creating The Perfect Baby
- By Kendall B. Williams, II
8INTRODUCTION
- Background
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis
- Case Study
- Explanation
- Ethical / Moral Issues
- Who is affected?
- Conclusions
9BACKGROUND
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis
- This is a process used to determine genetic
defects in an embryo before the birth of a child.
The first child born through this procedure was
in 1989 and by 1997 around 30 babies have been
born through this procedure. - The process is as follows
- Ideally the first step is that family history is
researched and genetic testing is performed on
the interested parties. - Woman is given drugs
- In-vitro fertilization methods are used to get an
egg - Once it has developed into 8 cells, one can be
extracted and used to develop DNA information - Molecular analysis ensues to gain inheritance
information - Abnormality-free egg is re-implanted and
hopefully takes
10BACKGROUND (Cont)
- At this time approximately 30 diseases can be
checked for and diagnosed, including - Achondroplasia
- Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency
- Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Deficiency
- Alzheimer Disease(AAP gene)
- Beta Thalassemia
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Epidermolysis Bullosa
- Fanconi Anemia
- Gaucher Disease
- Hemophilia A and B
- Huntington Disease
- Muscular Dystrophy
- Myotonic Dystrophy
- Neurofibromatosis Type I
11CASE STUDY
- LARRY SHANNON
- Have a 4-year old girl (Sally) that has Fanconi
Anemia - Hole in heart
- No Thumbs
- Impaired kidney problems
- She is not expected to live much longer
- The parents want to have another baby
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis (Risks involved)
- Umbilical Cord fluid use for Sally
- Healthy new baby for parents
12CASE STUDY (Cont)
- A team of researchers have been addressed about
the issue - A debate ensues about the entire procedure for
those who have newly entered the group. - The ethicality of the procedure is discussed
- The researchers differ in views which could
potentially become a problem during the process. - Through these researchers actions a precedent
will be set for further work done in this field.
13ETHICAL / MORAL ISSUES
- Should anyone be allowed to create the
genetically perfect baby? - Is it ethically right to give birth to a child
with the expectation of using them as a possible
cure for another individual? - Is it fair that this burden has been placed
solely on the research team? - Are we playing god in engaging in this
procedure, rather than simply diagnosing the
possible disease? - Is there a chance that some religious groups and
extremists could cause a riot if this procedure
is followed through, therefore setting a
precedent? If so, what problems could that
cause? - What should happen to the in vitro fertilized
eggs that are not being used? - Might this procedure be viewed as a contribution
to increasing abortion rates?
14CONCLUSION
- This issue is extremely controversial among the
members of society, especially among those
researchers who are going to engage in such
activity. - Just as in most of the other ethically and
morally questionable issues, there is no black or
white answer. (All is gray)
15The Genetic 411
16The Issue
- Will recent advances in the Human Genome Project,
meant for improving human health, lead to
discrimination in insurance or employment?
17The Arguments
- Believing that advances in genetic technology
will lead to discrimination is unfounded based on
experimental data, leading to public
misinformation concerning genetic research.
- Believing that advance in genetic technology will
lead to discrimination is credible based on
public opinion polls and the history of
eugenics.
18No Problem Dude
- Laws
- Most states have laws prohibiting genetic
discrimination - Federal Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health
Insurance and Employment Act under consideration - Such laws do more to harm than help
- Market tests
- Fake people with unhealthy family history or a
bad genetic test - No measurable impact
- A problem does not seem to exist
19No Problem Dude
- The nature of insurance
- Premium proportional to mortality risk
- Most premiums low because risk of premature death
is low - Fairness same premium vs. proportional premium
- Genetic privacy
- Not viable unless a particular societal ill can
be pinpointed - No need to allow insurers to order genetic tests
20No Problem Dude
Conclusion
21Houston, we have a problem
- Public concern
- Recent study 1/3 fearful that genetic info
could cause loss of health insurance - Time magazine 75 would not want insurers to
know their predisposed diseases - No time to waste
- Medical database hard to remove or prevent
disclosure - Nonmedical uses will lead to greater
distribution of genetic information
22Houston, we have a problem
- History of Eugenics
- U.S. used genetic inferiority to restrict
immigration - Scientific justification of Holocaust
- African Americans denied insurance coverage and
charged higher rates based on genetic mutation - Northern Santa Fe Railway Company secretly
tested employees for carpal tunnel genetic
variation, had to pay 2.2 million to employees
23Houston, we have a problem
We must establish an effective legislative
framework that reduces the threat of harm by
restricting access to genetic information and
enforcing penalties for discrimination.
24Solutions
- Problem, what problem? No solution for a
nonexistent problem. - Genetic privacy is necessary and causes no
significant gain or loss to health insurers or
employers.
25Your turn
- What do you think?
- Are you fearful for your genetic info?
- Whats the solution?
26In Vitro Fertilization
27Background
- Eggs removed from Mother
- Parents' egg and sperm are mixed in a Petri dish
to fertilize - AID or artificial insemination by donor sperm
- AIH or artificial insemination by the husband
- Implantation of pre-embryo into uterus tissue
28(No Transcript)
29Interesting Facts
- Low chance of success from IVF
- 25 percent
- Research shows double likelihood of birth defects
- Costs
- IVF procedure 5,000-10,000
- Total medical 10,000-50,000
30Case Study Dilemma
- Betty and Junior married and attempted IVF
- Unsuccessful
- Junior divorces
- Betty wishes to use left over pre-embryos
- Roughly 4 left
- Junior says no
31Ethical Issues Case Study
- No precedent in courts
- To whom does the fertilized egg belong?
- Does Betty have a right to have a baby with
Juniors sperm if he does not consent? - Does Junior have a right to say no?
- Should the fertilized eggs be stored at all?
32Possible Solutions
- Disallow the storage of fertilized eggs
- Allow one party to make a decision
- Release only with mutual consent
33Best Solution
- Mutual consent
- Unfair to bring an unwilling party to have a
child - Not like forgetting protection
- If Betty really wants child use donor sperm
34Ethical Issues IVF
- What about fertilized cells not used?
- Is it unethical to fertilize eggs in a Petri
dish? - Test tube babies