Title: Chapter ThirtyFive
1Chapter Thirty-Five
2Information Technologies
- The crucial ideas are
- Complementarity
- Network externality
3Information TechnologiesComplementarity
- Definition Commodity A complements commodity B
if more of commodity A increases the value of an
extra unit of commodity B. - More software increases the value of a computer.
- More roads increase the value of a car.
4Information TechnologiesNetwork Externality
- Definition A commodity has a positive (negative)
network externality if the utility to a consumer
of that commodity increases (decreases) as more
people also consume the commodity. - Email gives more utility to any one user if more
other people use email. - A highway gives less utility to any one user as
more people use it (congestion).
5Complementarity
- Information technologies have increased greatly
the complementarities between commodities. - Computers and operating systems (OS).
- DVD players and DVD disks.
- WiFi sites and laptop computers.
- Cell phones and cell phone towers.
6Complementarity
- How should a firm behave when it produces a
commodity that complements another commodity? - The problem is When you make more of your
product (commodity A) you increase the value of
firm Bs product (commodity B). Can you get for
yourself some of gain you create for firm B?
7Complementarity
- An obvious strategy is for firms A and B to
cooperate somewhat with each other. - Microsoft releases part of its OS to firms making
software that runs under its OS. - DVD manufacturers agree upon a standard format
for their disks.
8Complementarity
- The price of a computer is pC.
- The price of the OS is pOS.
- The quantities demanded of computers and the OS
depends upon pC pOS, not just pC or just pOS.
9Complementarity
- The price of a computer is pC.
- The price of the OS is pOS.
- The quantities demanded of computers and the OS
depends upon pC pOS, not just pC or just pOS. - Suppose the computer and software firms marginal
production costs are zero. Fixed costs are FC
and FOS.
10Complementarity
- Suppose the firms do not collude.
- The computer firms problem is choose pC to
maximize pCD(pC pOS) FC. - The OS firms problem ischoose pOS to maximize
pOSD(pC pOS) FOS.
11Complementarity
- Suppose the firms do not collude.
- The computer firms problem is choose pC to
maximize pCD(pC pOS) FC. - The OS firms problem ischoose pOS to maximize
pOSD(pC pOS) FOS. - Assume D(pC pOS) a b(pC pOS).
12Complementarity
- The computer firms problem is choose pC to
maximize pC(a b(pC pOS)) FC. - The OS firms problem ischoose pOS to maximize
pOS(a b(pC pOS)) FOS.
13Complementarity
- Choose pC to maximize pC(a b(pC pOS))
FC? pC (a bpOS)/2b.
(C) - Choose pOS to maximize pOS(a b(pC
pOS)) FOS? pOS (a bpC)/2b.
(OS)
14Complementarity
- Choose pC to maximize pC(a b(pC pOS))
FC? pC (a bpOS)/2b.
(C) - Choose pOS to maximize pOS(a b(pC
pOS)) FOS? pOS (a bpC)/2b.
(OS) - A NE is a pair (pC,pOS) solving (C) and (OS).
15Complementarity
- Choose pC to maximize pC(a b(pC pOS))
FC? pC (a bpOS)/2b.
(C) - Choose pOS to maximize pOS(a b(pC
pOS)) FOS? pOS (a bpC)/2b.
(OS) - A NE is a pair (pC,pOS) solving (C) and (OS).
pC pOS a/3b.
16Complementarity
- pC pOS a/3b.
- When the firms do not cooperate the price of a
computer with an OS is pC pOS
2a/3band the quantities demanded of computers
and OS are qC qOS a - b2a/3b a/3.
17Complementarity
- What if the firms merge? Then the new firm
bundles a computer and an operating system and
sells the bundle at a price pB. - The firms problem is to choose pB to maximize
pBD(pB) FB pB(a bpB) FB.
18Complementarity
- What if the firms merge? Then the new firm
bundles a computer and an operating system and
sells the bundle at a price pB. - The firms problem is to choose pB to maximize
pBD(pB) FB pB(a bpB) FB. - Solution is pB a/2b
19Complementarity
- When the firms merge (or fully cooperate) the
price of a computer and an OS is
pB a/2b bundled computers and OS is qB a -
ba/2b a/2 a/3.
20Complementarity
- When the firms merge (or fully cooperate) the
price of a computer and an OS is
pB a/2b bundled computers and OS is qB a -
ba/2b a/2 a/3. - The merged firm supplies more computers and OS at
a lower price than do the competing firms. Why?
21Complementarity
- The noncooperative firms ignore the external
benefit (complementarity) each creates for the
other. So each undersupplies the market, causing
a higher market price. - These externalities are fully internalized in the
merged firm, inducing it to supply more computers
and OS and thereby cause a lower market price.
22Complementarity
- More typical cooperation consists of contracts
between component manufacturers and an assembler
of a final product. Examples are - Car components and a car assembler.
- A computer assembler and manufacturers of CPUs,
hard drives, memory chips, etc.
23Complementarity
- Alternatives include
- Revenue-sharing. Two firms share the revenue
from the final product made up from the two
firms components. - Licensing. Let firms making complements to your
product use your technology for a low fee so they
make large quantities of complements, thereby
increasing the value of your product to consumers.
24Information TechnologiesLock-In
- Strong complementarities or network externalities
make switching from one technology to another
very costly. This is called lock-in. - E.g., In the USA, it is costly to switch from
speaking English to speaking French. - How do markets operate when there are switching
costs or network externalities?
25Competition Switching Costs
- Producers cost per month of providing a network
service is c per customer. - Customers switching cost is s.
- Producer offers a one month discount, d.
- Rate of interest is r.
26Competition Switching Costs
- All producers set the same nondiscounted price of
p per month. - When is switching producers rational for a
customer?
27Competition Switching Costs
- Consumers cost of not switching is
28Competition Switching Costs
- Consumers cost of not switching is
- Consumers cost from switching is
29Competition Switching Costs
- Consumers cost of not switching is
- Consumers cost from switching is
- Consumer should switch if
30Competition Switching Costs
- Consumers cost of not switching is
- Consumers cost from switching is
- Consumer should switch if
- i.e. if
31Competition Switching Costs
- Consumer should switch if
- Producer competition will ensure at a market
equilibrium that customers are indifferent
between switching or not ? I.e., the
equilibrium value of the discount only just makes
it worthwhile for the customer to switch.
32Competition Switching Costs
- With d s, the present-value of the producers
profits is
33Competition Switching Costs
- At equilibrium the present-value of the
producers profit is zero. - The producers price is its marginal cost plus a
markup that is a fraction of the consumers
switching cost.
34Competition Switching Costs
- At equilibrium the present-value of the
producers profit is zero. - The producers price is its marginal cost plus a
markup that is a fraction of the consumers
switching cost. If advertising reduces the
marginal cost of servicing a consumer by a then
35Competition Switching Costs
- At equilibrium the present-value of the
producers profit is zero. - The producers price is its marginal cost plus a
markup that is a fraction of the consumers
switching cost. If advertising reduces the
marginal cost of servicing a consumer by a then
36Competition Network Externalities
- Individuals 1,,1000.
- Each can buy one unit of a good, providing a
network externality. - Person v values a unit of the good at nv, where n
is the number of persons who buy the good.
37Competition Network Externalities
- Individuals 1,,1000.
- Each can buy one unit of a good providing a
network externality. - Person v values a unit of the good at nv, where n
is the number of persons who buy the good. - At a price p, what is the quantity demanded of
the good?
38Competition Network Externalities
- If v is the marginal buyer, valuing the good at
nv p, then all buyers v v value the good
more, and so buy it. - Quantity demanded is n 1000 - v.
- So inverse demand is p n(1000-n).
39Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
0
1000
n
40Competition Network Externalities
- Suppose all suppliers have the same marginal
production cost, c.
41Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Supply Curve
c
0
1000
n
42Competition Network Externalities
- What are the market equilibria?
43Competition Network Externalities
- What are the market equilibria?
- (a) No buyer buys, no seller supplies.
- If n 0, then value nv 0 for all buyers v, so
no buyer buys. - If no buyer buys, then no seller supplies.
44Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Supply Curve
c
(a)
0
1000
n
45Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Supply Curve
c
(a)
n
0
1000
n
46Competition Network Externalities
- What are the market equilibria?
- (b) A small number, n, of buyers buy.
- small n ? small network externality value nv
- good is bought only by buyers with nv ? c i.e.,
only large v ? v c/n.
47Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Supply Curve
c
(b)
(c)
(a)
n
n
0
1000
n
48Competition Network Externalities
- What are the market equilibria?
- (c) A large number, n, of buyers buy.
- Large n ? large network externality value nv
- good is bought only by buyers with nv ? c i.e.,
up to small v ? v c/n.
49Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Supply Curve
c
(b)
(c)
(a)
n
n
0
1000
n
Which equilibrium is likely to occur?
50Competition Network Externalities
- Suppose the market expands whenever
willingness-to-pay exceeds marginal production
cost, c.
51Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Supply Curve
c
n
n
0
1000
n
Which equilibrium is likely to occur?
52Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Unstable
Supply Curve
c
n
n
0
1000
n
Which equilibrium is likely to occur?
53Competition Network Externalities
Willingness-to-pay p n(1000-n)
Demand Curve
Stable
Supply Curve
c
Stable
n
0
1000
n
Which equilibrium is likely to occur?
54Rights Management
- Should a good be
- sold outright,
- licensed for production by others, or
- rented?
- How is the ownership right of the good to be
managed?
55Rights Management
- Suppose production costs are negligible.
- Market demand is p(y).
- The firm wishes to
56Rights Management
57Rights Management
58Rights Management
59Rights Management
- The rights owner now allows a free trial period.
This causes - a consumption increase
60Rights Management
- The rights owner now allows a free trial period.
This causes - a consumption increase
- lower sales per consumption unit
61Rights Management
- The rights owner now allows a free trial period.
This causes - a consumption increase
- lower sales per consumption unit
- increase in value to all users ? increase in
willingness-to-pay
62Rights Management
63Rights Management
- The firms problem is now to
64Rights Management
- The firms problem is now to
- This problem must have the same solution as
65Rights Management
- The firms problem is now to
- This problem must have the same solution as
- So
66Rights Management
67Rights Management
? higher profit
68Rights Management
? lower profit
69Sharing Intellectual Property
- Produce a lot for direct sales, or only a little
for multiple rentals? - Sell a tool, or rent it?
- Allow a movie to be shown only at a theatre, or
sell only to video rental stores, or sell only by
pay-per-view, or sell DVDs in retail stores? - When is selling for rental more profitable than
selling for personal use only?
70Sharing Intellectual Property
- F is the fixed cost of designing the good.
- c is the constant marginal cost of copying the
good. - p(y) is the market demand.
- Direct sales problem is to
71Sharing Intellectual Property
- F is the fixed cost of designing the good.
- c is the constant marginal cost of copying the
good. - p(y) is the market demand.
- Direct sales problem is to
72Sharing Intellectual Property
- Is selling for rental more profitable?
- Each rental unit is used by k 1 consumers.
- So y units sold ? x ky consumption units.
73Sharing Intellectual Property
- Is selling for rental more profitable?
- Each rental unit is used by k 1 consumers.
- So y units sold ? x ky consumption units.
- Marginal consumers willingness-to-pay is p(x)
p(ky).
74Sharing Intellectual Property
- Is selling for rental more profitable?
- Each rental unit used by k 1 consumers.
- So y units sold ? x ky consumption units.
- Marginal consumers willingness-to-pay is p(x)
p(ky). - Rental transaction cost t reduces
willingness-to-pay to p(ky) - t.
75Sharing Intellectual Property
- Rental transaction cost t reduces
willingness-to-pay to p(ky) - t. - Rental stores willingness-to-pay is
76Sharing Intellectual Property
- Rental transaction cost t reduces
willingness-to-pay to p(ky) - t. - Rental stores willingness-to-pay is
- Producers sale-for-rental problem is
77Sharing Intellectual Property
- Rental transaction cost t reduces
willingness-to-pay to p(ky) - t. - Rental stores willingness-to-pay is
- Producers sale-for-rental problem is
78Sharing Intellectual Property
- Rental transaction cost t reduces
willingness-to-pay to p(ky) - t. - Rental stores willingness-to-pay is
- Producers sale-for-rental problem is
79Sharing Intellectual Property
This is the same as the direct sale problem
except for the marginal cost.
80Sharing Intellectual Property
This is the same as the direct sale problem
except for the marginal cost. Direct sale is
better for the producer if
81Sharing Intellectual Property
- Direct sale is better for the producer if
- i.e. if
82Sharing Intellectual Property
- Direct sale is better for the producer if
- Direct sale is better if
- replication cost c is low
- rental transaction cost t is high
- rentals per item, k, is small.