Psychology in Practice PiP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Psychology in Practice PiP

Description:

Methodological Philosophy so far largely ... No control around context e.g.Eastenders. Non-Verbs. Cues to pick up on e.g. sad ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: mike65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psychology in Practice PiP


1
Psychology in Practice (PiP)
  • Qualitative Research
  • Interviewing

2
RMS so far .
  • Methodological Philosophy so far largely
  • Positivist mechanical approach/experiments/obser
    ving behaviour / objective/ quantifiable data
    generalised/ replicated
  • Correlation, T Test, Mann Whitney, Anova,
    Multiple Regression more recently
    questionnaires Is there a difference/relationship
  • Is there a difference/relationship
  • BUT it doesnt necessarily tell us
  • Whats going on with the individual .
  • Time now to put qualitative data collection into
    practice
  • Inside data ? ask the question WHY?
  • Qualitative research relies on interpreting
    values the subjective / understanding the
    attitudes/belief system of people / it gets
    inside someones worldview

3
PiP Assignment 1
  • Conduct a piece of qualitative research on a
    fellow 3rd year who does not study PiP
  • Conduct a Semi Structured Interview
  • Thematically analyse
  • Write up Ind Qualitative Report 2K words
  • Hyp What stresses do students experience during
    their HE studies?
  • So what sort of stresses do you think could be
    explored?
  • Dates Transcript to work on 16th October (Mon
    Class)
  • Assignment hand in date for the Qualitative
    Report is 28th November (Tues)

4
Why interview?
  • We need to
  • Get our hands dirty
  • Objective of Interviewing
  • Get inside data WHY?
  • Research conducted with participants not on
    them
  • Qualitative research values subjectivity/holisti
    c approach
  • stories/narratives
  • collaborative relationship
  • Hermeneutics getting inside meaning
  • High ecological validity
  • So who do you think is a good interviewer?
  • Why?

5
Types of Interview
  • Structured
  • Semi-structured
  • Unstructured
  • Email interviews
  • Focus Group interviews

6
Structured Interview Advantages
Disadvantages
  • Qs preformatted ? interview schedule
  • Uniform less likely to lead interviewees  
  • Avoids interviewer effects and demand
    characteristics
  • Produces objective data responses
  • More generalisable
  • Resource-wise economical
  • quicker
  • needs less training.
  • Formal in composition
  • Potentially clinical/ off-putting
  • creates tension for interviewee
  • Restricts depth of data
  • Success is reliant on good question formation
  • Expensive in planning stages although, probably
    cheaper in the long run.  

7
Unstructured Interview Advantages
Disadvantages
  • Interview Guide ? list of exploratory topics e.g.
    psychoanalysis/counselling
  • Produces rich data
  • Allows the interviewer / interviewee freedom
    around questions / discussion
  • Freedom often relies on hypothetical / rhetorical
    lines of enquiry
  • Conversational less inhibiting
  • High ecological validity 
  • Good for following up initial data collection/
    seeking clarity/depth.  
  • Expensive to conduct
  • around time
  • expertise of interviewer
  • Difficult to conduct, e.g. can drift off on a
    tangent
  • Requires experienced interviewer e.g.
  • reflexive / sensitive
  • good at probing and prompting 
  • Subjectively led
  • Interviewer bias
  • Less generalisable

8
Things to think about with..
  • Unstructured
  • Resource - costly
  • More time-consuming
  • Poss. of drift around the line of enquiry
  • Interviewee may hijack the interview!
  • Requires a more experienced interviewer
  • Can be subjectively led bias
  • Less generalisable
  • Structured
  • Rigid, closed structure
  • Pressure on question formulation
  • Ethics, question sensitivity/clarity is crucial
  • Frequently used for Quantitative research
  • Interview Schedule

9
Semi-Structured InterviewAdvantages
Disadvantages
  • Themes set of questions to some extent
    preformatted
  • Interview guide
  • Interviewer can provide clarity _at_ Qs e.g.
  • difficulty understanding
  • around special needs/accent/discourse 
  • Flexibility
  • Guide ? option to pursue/follow-up lines of
    enquiry around points of interests
  • Less formal for interviewee
  • more likely to feel they are being listened to
    and contribution valued
  • Richer data/ more ecologically valid   
  • Resource - costly
  • More time-consuming
  • Poss. of drift around the line of enquiry
  • Interviewee may hijack the interview!
  • Requires a more experienced interviewer
  • Can be subjectively led bias
  • Less generalisable

10
Email / Chat Room Interviewing
  • Topics disabilities, sex issues, disfigurement,
    people with mobility issues
  • How ?
  • Locate informants through general search engine
  • Negotiate entry with web-site co-ordinator
  • Open / ethical as a conventional interview i.e.
    informed consent, respect privacy, anonymity,
    confidentiality, allow withdrawal of consent

11
Email/Chat Room Interviews Advantages
Disadvantages
  • Accessibility
  • Distance
  • Time that suits
  • Time-efficient
  • Print offs
  • Data management/analysis
  • Sensitive Info/topics
  • Clarity seeking/thinking
  • Relationships L/Term personal/chatty/richer
  • Empowerment greater sense of ownership around
    response confidence
  • Multi-vocal several strands of discussion
  • Flow of information
  • Data overload
  • Dependent on log-ons
  • Context
  • No control around context e.g.Eastenders
  • Non-Verbs
  • Cues to pick up on e.g. sad
  • Invisibility and presentation of self
  • Who are you REALLY talking to
  • Sampling Issues
  • Snowballing sampling no control
  • Open Questions interviewee is free to respond
    any way they wish

12
So constructing questions .
  • Open Questions allow people to respond whichever
    way they want e.g. what do you think of the
    parking at Hope?
  • Closed Questions tend to lead to a specific
    answer - e.g. are you a psychology student?
  • Leading Questions subjectively lead e.g. dont
    you think the parking at Hope is poor? X
  • Double-barrelled Questions just confuse! X
  • Ambiguity
  • Prompting Questions are useful e.g.
  • Could you tell me a little more about that?
  • How did you feel about.
  • Really, thats so interesting.
  • Sharing information as a prompt reciprocal
    arrangement/ understanding ? builds rapport
  • Follow up questions earlier you mentioned .

13
Interviewing What, where and how
  • What Anything and everything
  • Where somewhere quiet, appropriate setting
  • How
  • Tape
  • Dept has equipment you can borrow
  • Think ethics! (be sensitive)
  • Informed consent, anonymous, confidential, right
    to withdraw
  • Copy of transcript

14
Interviewer Skills Dos and Donts
  • Try to put your interviewee at ease explain
    what your research is about
  • Ensure you remain professional treat your
    interviewee with respect be interested theyve
    given up time for you
  • Think about the words you use will they be
    understood
  • Aim for a natural dialogue prompt and probe but
    be sensitive
  • Listen carefully to your interviewee
  • Remember points made and come back to them if
    appropriate / interesting or relevant
  • Share your experiences but dont hijack the
    interview
  • Observe your interviewees nonverbals e.g. does
    s/he look comfortable or teary
  • Practice makes perfect try your interview style
    on for
  • size

15
Reflexive Practice
  • If Qualitative Research values the subjectivity
    of participants then it also values the same in
    researchers
  • To be reflexive is to also locate you in the
    process
  • Honest acknowledgement/account of how you have
    affected the research outcome
  • Beyond simply practical considerations such
    location etc
  • Considers your viewpoint and potential for
    researcher bias
  • For example, preconceived ideas, biases and the
    ways in which that might have affected your
    interpretation of the data collected

16
References
  • Key Text Smith, J.A. (2003), Qualitative
    Psychology. London, Sage Publications Chapters, 4
    6.
  • Supplementary Reading
  • Behar, R. (2003), Ethnography and the book that
    was lost. Ethnography, Vol. 4(1) 15-39.
  • Cunliffe, A.L. (2003) Reflexive inquiry in
    organizational research Questions and
    possibilities .Human Relations Vol. 56 (8)
    983-1003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com