Craft of Research, 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Craft of Research, 2

Description:

Great opportunity to mislead by accident or by design. Is the warrant qualified? ... Are quotes, &c., accurate? Is there a logical structure to the argument ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:342
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Bix7
Category:
Tags: craft | great | quotes | research

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Craft of Research, 2


1
Craft of Research, 2
2
Asking Questions, Finding Answers
  • Recap researchers look for significant
    questions
  • Actually trying to pose and to solve a problem
    that s/he thinks others should recognize as worth
    solving
  • Narrowing from idea to researchable problem
    isnt easy.
  • Try to identify subquestions.

3
From topics to questions
  • When reading an article, see if you can fill in
    the blanks
  • The author is studying _______
  • because s/he wants to find out who/how/why
    ______,
  • in order to understand how/why/what _____.

4
From questions to sources
  • Look for these themes in the Reflective Inquiry
    slides
  • Sources
  • Librarians
  • General encyclopedia and dictionaries
  • Bibliographical guides
  • Card online catalogues
  • Specialized enc., dict., bibliographies
  • Guides to the literature.

5
From questions to sources
  • Librarians
  • Experts
  • Other people
  • Printed resources
  • Primary
  • Secondary
  • Tertiary

6
Using sources
  • Be careful make correct bilbiographic citations
    and accurate summaries/abstracts of the text
  • Get the context right
  • Why?

7
Claims Supporting them
  • Researchers make claims,
  • support them thru the literature,
  • through their argumentation, and, esp.
  • through the evidence.

8
Claims Supporting them
  • Good argumentation
  • Notice the cause-and-effect (you claim x caused y
    because )
  • Consider the readers questions (p. 89)

9
Claims and Supporting them
  • The Warrant
  • To explain why your data are relevant, you may
    have to articulate an element of your argument
    that is often left tacit. It shows why any
    particular body of data should count as evidence
    in support of your claim.
  • Key to persuasion
  • Great opportunity to mislead by accident or by
    design
  • Is the warrant qualified? Should it be?!
  • Does the qualification affect interpretation?

10
Claims evidence
  • Substantive (facts)
  • Contestable (your goal is to demonstrate,
    explain, not proclaim)
  • Specific thats why the research problem is
    vital.

11
Warrants
  • Whats the quality of the warrant?
  • False
  • Unclear
  • Inappropriate
  • Inapplicable

12
Qualifications
  • Does the research qualify the claim? Is there a
    complete, accurate, fair explanation of
  • Rebuttals
  • Complete review of all relevant aspects of the
    problem?
  • Concessions updated research on the problem?
  • Limiting conditions (generalizability)
  • Limiting scope (whats being studied)

13
Preparing to Draft Revise
  • Before writing assemble all the evidence,
    warrants, objections to rebut
  • Preliminary interpretations conclusionAlternati
    ve interpretations?
  • Is the research question answered?

14
Preparing to Draft Revise
  • Main points
  • Are quotes, c., accurate?
  • Is there a logical structure to the argument
  • Dont be afraid to draft, revise, and revise
    again!
  • Because researchers construct an argument
    carefully, we can deconstruct the argument
    carefully, too.

15
Ethics
  • Plagiarism
  • Fabrication of data
  • Conflicts of interest
  • Ethical treatment of subjects
  • Science as self-correcting process
  • Peer review
  • Reviewers evaluate quality, validity, importance
  • Study replication

Students can you provide real-world examples?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com