Voicemail URI draftjenningssipvoicemailuri01 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Voicemail URI draftjenningssipvoicemailuri01

Description:

fluffy_at_cisco.com. Is this draft the best way to do this with a URI convention? ... INVITE sip:bob_at_um.example.com;target=bob?Reason=SIP;cause=486. Should we do History? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: CullenJ4
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Voicemail URI draftjenningssipvoicemailuri01


1
Voicemail URIdraft-jennings-sip-voicemail-uri-01
  • Cullen Jennings
  • fluffy_at_cisco.com

2
Is this draft the best way to do this with a URI
convention?
  • Does this capture the semantics we want?
  • Is the syntax reasonable?
  • Open Issue Reason in a parameter or a header?
  • INVITE sipbob_at_um.example.comtargetbob SIP/2.0
  • Reason SIP cause486
  • Or
  • INVITE sipbob_at_um.example.comtargetbob?ReasonSI
    Pcause486

3
Should we do History?
  • There are requirements for History that voicemail
    URI doesnt satisfy
  • The security properties of History are useful in
    the general case
  • Using history for voicemail does not require
    configuration coordination between proxy and
    voicemail server
  • Recommendation Yes

4
Should we do Voicemail URI
  • Question Who wants to implement this?
  • History has been held up by suggestions that URI
    is a better approach.
  • We now have this approach documented. All the
    information to make a decisions is available.
  • History allows the VM system to figure out what
    service to provide.
  • Voicemail URI allows the proxy to tell the VM
    what service to provide.
  • Recommendation I dont care but decide soon.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com