UTILIZING EXPERTS IN RULEMAKING IN CALIFORNIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

UTILIZING EXPERTS IN RULEMAKING IN CALIFORNIA

Description:

An interested public member (w/ experts) On what topics may a public member request rulemaking? ... Name, address, and telephone number; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: mkim4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UTILIZING EXPERTS IN RULEMAKING IN CALIFORNIA


1
UTILIZING EXPERTS IN RULEMAKING IN CALIFORNIA
  • MARGRET J. KIM
  • PUBLIC ADVISER
  • CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
  • Beijing, China
  • August 16-17, 2005

2
OUTLINE
  • Initiating Rulemaking
  • Pre-rulemaking Workshops
  • Public Comment Period
  • Common Issues

3
INITIATING RULEMAKING
  • Who may initiate rulemaking?
  • Anyone
  • Typically, 3 ways
  • Agency on its own motion
  • Agency may request proposals or
  • An interested public member (w/ experts)
  • On what topics may a public member request
    rulemaking?
  • Any topic as long as enforced or administered by
    that Agency

4
  • What steps are required for a public member to
    request rulemaking?
  • Petition with the Agency
  • What is typically required in the petition?
  • Name, address, and telephone number
  • The substance or nature of the regulation,
    amendment, or repeal requested
  • The reason for request
  • Reference to the authority of the agency to
    adopt, amend, or repeal the regulation.

5
  • PRE-RULEMAKING WORKSHOPS
  • (prior to formal public comment)
  • Are pre-rulemaking workshops required?
  • Extensive or complex issues
  • As a matter of course
  • Frequency of workshops

6
  • Are pre-rulemaking workshops formal or informal?
    What is the difference?
  • Formal vs. Informal
  • Open to the public
  • Administrative record
  • Duration of workshops

7
  • What are the benefits of holding workshops?
  • A well-balanced group representing various
    stakeholders to
  • identify and investigate the scope and extent of
    issues
  • resolve issues by exploring various options to
    improve the regulations, including suggestions
    for draft language
  • learn how other related regulations may be
    impacted from those that may be affected by the
    proposal.
  • Avoid surprises at the formal rulemaking
  • To build support through collaboration

8
  • What is a stakeholder?
  • A person or interest group who have a stake in
    the decision.
  • It can include businesses, trade organizations,
    environmental organizations, consumer and health
    groups, educations groups, labor organizations,
    other government agencies, etc.
  • How are they selected?
  • Not pre-selected
  • Anyone may join
  • Engage a broad and balanced group of stakeholders

9
  • How do you identify and develop a stakeholders
    group?
  • Solicit input on an on-going basis throughout the
    year
  • Websites to send comments by mail or via email
  • Post cards or flyers
  • Conduct an active search
  • What is the role of experts at the workshops?
  • Retained by stakeholders
  • Invitation to present

10
  • Are the experts considered to be neutral?
  • Clients views
  • Other non-retained experts
  • Agency must stay neutral
  • The ultimate policymaking
  • Will the Agency have an in-house expert or hire
    outside consultants?
  • In-house experts
  • When to hire outside experts

11
  • Are advisory committees or task forces set up by
    government agency for rulemaking purposes?
  • Complexity of the issues
  • Not be the only approach
  • Selection of the members
  • Conflict of interest or mistrust
  • Subject to Open Meeting Act
  • How do you hold the workshops?
  • Group different stakeholders
  • Workshops initially held separately
  • Workshops are open to the public

12
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
  • How long is the public comment period?
  • At a minimum 45 days
  • What is the role of experts during the public
    comment period?
  • Same as workshop

13
  • Are some comments required to be submitted as
    testimony?
  • Matters of fact or of technical expertise
  • Do comments made by experts (written or oral)
    during the public comment period become part of
    the official record and made available to the
    public ? Yes
  • All information, studies or reports either
    submitted to the agency or relied upon by the
    Agency become part of the rulemaking record.
  • The rulemaking file is made available to the
    public for inspection and copying.

14
COMMON ISSUES
  • What are some of common issues with public
    participation in rulemaking?
  • Lack of balanced representation
  • Insufficient outreach
  • Over reliance on certain experts
  • Insufficient engagement by a broad cross-section
    of society
  • Too technical
  • Not sure how it will impact them
  • Lack of resource
  • Insufficient use of pre-rulemaking workshops

15
  • What are some recommendations to improve public
    participation in rulemaking?
  • Education
  • Outreach
  • Technology
  • Training
  • Additional resources for agency and public

16
THE END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com