Tree Design for Networks Cahn ch'3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Tree Design for Networks Cahn ch'3

Description:

Cost for two sites with locations (V1, H1) and (V2, H2) with distance d = ($1000 ... Although the two routes between a pair of nodes can be asymmetric, there is only ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: eie507Eie
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tree Design for Networks Cahn ch'3


1
Tree Design for Networks (Cahn ch.3)
  • Tree reviewed
  • A loop is an edge where both endpoints are the
    same
  • Two edges are parallel if they have the same end
    points.
  • A graph is simple if there is no loops or
    parallel edges.
  • The degree of a node is the number of edges in
    the graph that have the node as an endpoint.The
    degrees of nodes in a graph are important graph
    property .
  • A component of a graph is a maximal connected
    subgraph.
  • A Tree is a connected, simple graph without
    cycles.
  • Any tree with n nodes has n-1 edges.
  • Trees are optimal network designs when links have
    very high capacity or enormously expensive, and
    there is no reliability constraints.

2
Network in Matrix Format
  • Early example Given the distances among 4
    cities, build the minimum road to connect them.
    Assume 1000/km to build the road.
  • Solution Choose the shorter distance links first
    and avoid those links that connect nodes already
    included. This is Kruskals MST Algorithm.

3
Minimum Cost Network (MST)
  • Select Charmes-Duval, Bregen-Charmes,
  • Avoid Bregen-Duval since both them already
    included.
  • Choose Anagon-Charmes.
  • The results is a star topology.
  • A tree is a star if only one node has degree
    greater than 1.
  • A tree is a chain if no node has degree greater
    than 2.

4
  • MST is good when
  • Links are highly reliable
  • Networks can tolerate low reliability
  • The number of sites are small.
  • Either Prims or Kruskals algorithm gives
    optimal solution.
  • MSTs are not good networks to use when the
    number of nodes is large.
  • Using Delite http//eie507.eie.polyu.edu.hk/handou
    ts/delitehttp//eie507.eie.polyu.edu.hk/handouts/
    delite/examples/instructions.htm

5
Squreworld Counter-example
  • 1000 miles x 1000 miles.
  • One type of transmission lines? 1Mbps.
  • dsqrt( dv2dh2/10 ), dvV1-V2,dhH1-H2
  • Cost for two sites with locations (V1, H1) and
    (V2, H2) with distance d (10006.1728d)/month
    .
  • Consider problems with 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100
    sites, traffics are normalized with 1kbps from
    one site to another. The traffic volumes grow
    quadratically

6
Generate Files for Squareworld Counter-example
  • Compile \Delite\Source\gen.c add macro define
    min(X, Y) (((X)lt(Y))?(X)(Y) )
  • Run gen ltnumber of nodesgt ltfilename.gengtto
    produce the 5, 20, 50, 100 nodes files, e.g., gen
    5 5out.gen.
  • Edit NG_TOT_REQ of .gen file according to total
    traffic (slide 5).
  • Run delite, select File Generate Input
  • Select the corresponding .gen file.
  • The monitor will show the files are successfully
    generated. They include .REQ (traffic
    requirement), .CST (cost file.). bandwidth in
    .REQ file should be 1000.
  • Invoke

7
MST for 5 Node Network
8
MST for 10 Node Network
9
Leggy-ness in Network
  • Traffic in the above 10 node MST takes a
    circuitous route between source and destination.
  • To quantify the leggy-ness in the network, we
    define
  • Definition 3.17 The number of hops (hop count)
    between node n1 and n2 is the number of edges in
    the path chosen by the routing algorithm for the
    traffic flowing from n1 to n2. If only one path
    is chosen or if all paths chosen have the same
    number of edges, then we denote the number by
    hops(n1, n2).

10
Average of Hops
  • Although the two routes between a pair of nodes
    can be asymmetric, there is only one path between
    a pair of nodes in a tree.
  • Definition 3.18 The average number of hops in a
    network,
  • The average number of hops is quite important in
    evaluating MST designs delay related to of
    hops.
  • The sum of the traffic on all links Total
    traffic x hops

11
MST for 20 Node Network
12
MST for 50 Node Network
Delite demo 5out1.inp
13
MST for 100 Node Network
14
Traffic Volume and Costs
  • The traffic of 100 node MST grows about 500
    times from 20kbps of 5 node MST.
  • 1.5 order of magnitude comes only from average
    hop count.
  • Problem MSTs tend to have very long and
    circuitous paths.

15
Shortest Path Trees
  • Definition 3.19 Given a weighted graph (G, w)
    and nodes n1 and n2, the shortest path from n1 to
    n2 is a path such that ?e?P w(e) is a minimum.
  • Segments of a shortest path are the shortest
    paths of their end points.
  • Definition 3.20 Given a weighted graph (G, w)
    and a node n1, a shortest path tree (SPT) rooted
    at n1 is a tree s.t. for any other node n2 ? G,
    the path from n1 to n2 in the tree T is a
    shortest path between the nodes n1 and n2.

16
SPT for 20 Node Network
Generated using Prim-Dijkstra with centerN14
alpha1.0
MST SPT Avg(HOPS)
4.4158 1.9000 Max_Util 0.099 0.019
17
SPT vs. MST
  • Queuing plus transmission delay and utilization
  • Let Then
  • Average packet delay
  • 20 node networks
  • Average packet delay for MSTCost48,686.
  • Average packet delay for SPT Cost88,612.
    higher cost, lower delay, N14 failure!

18
Prim-Dijkstra Tree
  • Try to find trees falls between MST and SPT.
  • Both Prim and Dijkstra algorithm start with
    initial label, looping over nodes to find one
    with smallest label, bringing it into the tree,
    finally re-labeling all the neighbors.
  • Prim-Dijkstra Tree uses the following
    label.Where 0 ???1 is used to parameterize
    the algorithm.
  • ?0, we build MST. ?1, we build an SPT from
    root.

19
Choosing Prim-Dijkstra Trees (100 nodes obtained
by Interpid network design tool)
?0.3 and ?0.4 give attractive trees.
20
TSP Tour provides more reliability
  • TSP tours do not scale
  • Theorem 3.3 Given uniform traffic any TSP tour
    of n nodes has avg(hops)(n1)/4 if n is odd, and
    n2/(4(n-1)) if n is even.
  • At 100 node tour, for the avg hop count, TSP tour
    is twice as bad as MST.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com