Winter weather - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Winter weather

Description:

Though Great Lakes most common, many other areas. Great Salt Lake, Finger Lakes, Chesapeake Bays, Sea of Japan, Hudson Bay... Lake weather ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:441
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: scottsh6
Category:
Tags: finger | lakes | weather | winter

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Winter weather


1
Winter weatherLake weather
  • Thanks to COMET program and Greg Byrd for many
    graphics

2
Review precipitation growth
  • Recall that until -40C, some H2O in the
    atmosphere will still be in liquid form

3
Snow crystal types
4
Precipitation growth mechanisms
5
Cloud types
  • Optimal conditions for ice growth are saturated
    air with respect to water (supersaturated for
    ice) and a temperature of -10 to -18C

6
Aviation and icing
7
Critical rain/snow thicknesses
  • 1000-500mb 5400 m
  • 1000-700mb 2840 m
  • 1000-850mb 1290 m
  • 850-700mb 1540 m
  • For freezing rain, on which side of these should
    you be on?

8
Why 850 mb?
  • Closest level to the surface historically
    analyzed.
  • Not confounded by surface features.

9
Combining levels
10
Critical thickness values
RED 1000-700 2840m THK CYAN 850-700 1540m
THK YELLOW 1000-850 1300m THK MAGENTA
700-500 2560m THK GREEN 850-500 4100m
THK WHITE 1000-500 5400m THK BLUE 850mb 0
degree Isotherm
11
Top-down method
  • Start where the precipitation forms, and then
    follow to the ground.

12
Elevated warm layer
  • How does this arise?
  • Significant ice in cloud if below -10C

13
Precipitation profiles
14
Near surface cold layer
  • Depth?
  • Surface vs. air temperature?
  • Wet bulb temperature at surface
  • If 1.5C, unlikely to be snow

15
Evaporation and melting
If Wet Bulb Zero is 1500m up, rain If Wet Bulb
Zero is uncertain
16
Sample skew-t
What would we forecast here?
17
Model output statistics
  • POZ Probability of freezing rain/sleet
  • POS Probability of snow
  • TYP Most likely type of precipitation (R/S/Z)

18
Model problems
  • 1. The procedure used may not accurately reflect
    the vertical profile
  • 2. There may be errors in fields such as surface
    temperature
  • 3. The effects of unresolved terrain and other
    unresolved surface features can not be accounted
    for
  • 4. Relatively large interpolation distances can
    result in greater errors
  • 5. Model terrain representation in the mountains
    can cause problems because of inaccurate model
    terrain height.

19
Lake weather
  • Due to time considerations, were only going to
    talk lake-effect precipitation
  • Lake-effect vs. lake-enhanced what is the
    difference?
  • Though Great Lakes most common, many other areas
  • Great Salt Lake, Finger Lakes, Chesapeake Bays,
    Sea of Japan, Hudson Bay

20
Lake weather
  • We understand lake weather quite well
  • We have trouble predicting it
  • Models are inadequate
  • Radar coverage can be inadequate

21
Lake weather
Heat, moisture, convergence, upslope movement,
and instability
22
2004-2005 Lake Erie snowbelt
23
Important considerations
  • Instability
  • Fetch
  • Wind shear
  • Upstream moisture
  • Synoptic (large)-scale forcing
  • Orography/topography
  • Snow/ice cover on the lake

24
Instability
  • How unstable?
  • A Lake T 850mb T difference of 13C implies
    absolutely unstable conditions
  • How deep is the instability?
  • Less than 5000 ft (1.5 km) and there may not be
    enough vertical motion
  • Why does instability end vertically?

25
Fetch
  • How long air is over water
  • Small differences in wind direction can lead to
    huge differences in fetch
  • 250- 225 mile fetch
  • 230 - 80 mile fetch

26
Favorable Fetches for Lake-Effect Snow
  • from LaDue (1996)

27
Wind and wind shear
  • Wind speed
  • Too strong not enough time over lakes
  • Too weak bands may not make it inland
  • Wind shear
  • Most organized bands happen with very little
    directional shear
  • Above 60 (surface 700 mb) difference and
    lake-effect doesnt really occur

28
Upstream moisture
  • Higher relative humidities upstream increase the
    likelihood of lake-effect
  • Bands can reform (Lake Huron bands redevelop over
    Erie)

29
Synoptic forcing
  • Cold advection aloft destabilizes
  • PVA may lift inversion

30
Topography
31
Types of snow
  • Single band
  • Multiple band
  • Multiple lake band

32
Inter-season variability
33
Inter-season variability
34
Climatology
35
Climatology
36
Single Band Development
  • Usually occurs with moderate to strong, deep
    instability - few strong bands
  • Usually occur when flow parallel to long axis of
    the lakes (long fetch)
  • 20 km wide but 200 km in length
  • Move towards shore if axis of wind is slightly
    off parallel

37
Single Bands
38
Single Bands
39
Multiple Bands
  • from NWS Marquette (1996)
  • Weaker than single bands,shallower mixed layer
  • Horizontal roll convection
  • Occur when mean boundary layer wind is more
    normal to the long axis of the lake
  • Oriented parallel to the mean wind direction
  • 10 km wide, 50 km long

40
Multiple bands
41
Multiple-Lake Bands
  • Bands develop over one lake and then may
    reorganize or intensify over the next.

42
Lake Huron fetch
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com