How high a hill can you make on a neutron star

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

How high a hill can you make on a neutron star

Description:

Higher than we used to think. Craziest publishable theory: 103 x standard ... Generic physical argument: meson stars too. August 3, 2006. Albert Einstein Institut ... –

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: beno8
Category:
Tags: high | hill | make | meson | neutron | star

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How high a hill can you make on a neutron star


1
How high a hill can you make on a neutron star?
  • Ben Owen

Owen PRL 2005 Owen CQG 2006
2
Answer ( Outline)
  • Higher than we used to think
  • Craziest publishable theory 103 x standard
  • Not so crazy theory 20 x standard
  • What is the standard anyway?
  • What does it mean?
  • Initial LIGO is interesting, especially with
    upgrade
  • A detection is (remotely) possible
  • Therefore upper limits will mean something
  • Pulsar glitches could come from starquakes again
  • Biggest gamma-ray superflare explained

3
What kind of hill?(for GW)
  • Quadrupole (lm2 density perturbation)
  • Not m0 (centrifugal bulge)
  • Not lm100 (Mt Everest)
  • Ellipticity e (Ixx-Iyy)/Izz
  • Quadrupole / moment of inertia
  • Dimensionless number
  • Tones down M and R dependence
  • Comparable to hill height / radius

4
Three matter models
  • Standard neutron star (lowest emax)
  • Extrapolated from laboratory nuclei reactions
  • Only calculation of ellipticity until recently
  • Solid strange quark star (highest emax)
  • Suspicious astrophysical phenomenology
  • Possible in QCD though seems unlikely
  • Not CFL (Alford Rajagopal Wilczek NPB 1999)
  • Hybrid star w/solid core (intermediate emax)
  • Gradual phase transition of nucleons to quarks
  • Generic physical argument meson stars too

5
Standard neutron star (crust)
  • Outer crust
  • Density lt few x 1011 g/cm3
  • N-rich nuclei in lattice
  • Electron capture, pycnonuclear reactions
  • Effective mass formula, laboratory cross sections
  • Inner crust (neutron drip)
  • Density lt 1.5 x 1014 g/cm3
  • Free neutron fluid coexists
  • 3 of M (of star)
  • 100 of e

6
Crust Monster
Ushomirsky Cutler Bildsten MNRAS 2000
  • Chemically detailed crust w/shear modulus m
  • Hydrostatic equilibrium (mountains sink)
  • Newtonian gravity (including self-gravity)
  • All strain in lm2 spherical harmonic
  • Breaking strain smax10-2 (not 10-5)
  • Result ?max ()msmaxR4/(GM2)
  • emax 6 x 10-7
  • () encodes structure, could change by 2
  • Max. quadrupole 2.4 x 1038 g cm2

7
Shear modulus
  • Energy (density) stored in unit shear strain
  • Electrostatics problem (Fuchs PRoyS 1936) (!)
  • Homogeneous bcc lattice
  • m ()q2D6/S4
  • Typical inner crust
  • Spacing S30fm
  • Diameter D20fm
  • Charge 50 (q is density)
  • m lt 1030 erg/cm3

8
Solid strange star
  • Strange Bodmer PRD 1971, Witten PRD 1984
  • Ground-state matter is strange quark gas?
  • Neutron stars become strange stars, R / 2
  • Solid strange Xu ApJL 2003 (and ongoing)
  • What if LMXB QPO are torsion modes of solid star?
  • Fitting QPO frequencies means m 103
  • Need quarks to cluster in groups up to 18
  • Suspicious origins, but not a priori ruled out
  • Result ?max 6 x 10-4
  • Mainly due to shear modulus

9
Hybrid star
Glendenning PRD 1992
  • Nucleon to quark phase transition is gradual (2
    conserved numbers)
  • Q droplets in N matter
  • Q rods in N matter
  • Alternating Q and N slabs
  • N rods in Q matter
  • N droplets in Q matter
  • Mixed phase is solid
  • Up to 8km of core
  • emax 1 x 10-5

10
Gradual phase transition
  • Not the usual minimum-pressure criterion
  • Nuclear matter has more neutrons than protons,
    costs isospin symmetry energy
  • Can make protons if negative charge dumped into
    quark matter blob
  • Blobs form lattice due to charge
  • Volume fraction is function of pressure
  • Size minimizes lattice energy (Coulomb surface)
  • Shape (dimension) minimizes lattice energy
  • Heiselberg Pethick Staubo PRL 1993

11
Pulsar glitches
  • 1969 Vela Crab seen to jump in frequency
  • Ruderman Nature 1969 proposes crust, quakes
  • Baym Pines AnnP 1971 show its not enough
  • Glitch energy 1044 erg can be stored in crust,
    barely
  • Takes too long to build up strain for another
    glitch
  • Vela 108 yr predicted, few yr observed
  • Crab 104 yr predicted, 10 yr observed
  • The Crab is a solid strange star?
  • Time / 103 since m 103

12
Soft gamma repeaters
  • Neutron stars that flare every few years
  • Magnetars (Duncan Thompson ApJL 1992)
  • B 1 x 1015 Gauss (spin age, steady x-rays,
    flares)
  • Flares (since 1979) up to 1044 erg elastic
    crust
  • Burton-Richter power law (earthquakes)
  • Magnetic field strains crust, slowly builds,
    crack!
  • Dec. 27, 2004 SGR 1806-20 superflare 1046 erg
  • OK with large shear modulus
  • Also explains lt 1ms rise time
  • And excites gravitational waves? (Horvath 2005)

13
Gravitational waves
  • S2 upper limits (LIGO PRL 2005)
  • Best ? few x 10-6 but spindown limit is lower
  • Best globular cluster e few x 10-5 (no
    spindown)
  • S5 (one year at design)
  • Will beat Crab spindown by a few (nebula?)
  • S6 (factor 2 upgrade) (Owen CQG 2006)
  • Crab can get ? 5 x 10-5 (spindown 7 x 10-4)
  • J19523252 ? 9 x 10-5 (spindown 11 x 10-5)
  • J0537-6910 ? 9 x 10-5 ( spindown oops!)

14
Whats it mean for LIGO?
  • Factors of 2 matter
  • Moment of inertia (Pitkin CQG 2006)
  • Distance, multiple pieces, ?
  • Instrument upgrade is good get rid of mystery
    noise
  • Detection is possible
  • Known pulsars w/initial LIGO only if exotic -
    hard evidence for strange quark stars
  • Upper limits are interesting
  • Cant rule out strange stars, but accumulate
    evidence (population studies?)

15
Wrap
  • Star quakes look interesting again (for both
    glitches and gammas)
  • LIGO is interesting now - not just 2014
  • Its worth doing this in more detail
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com