Excited Hadrons: Lattice results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Excited Hadrons: Lattice results

Description:

Mesons: type. pseudoscalar. vector. 4 interpolaters: ng5n, ng4g5n, ... Meson summary (chiral extrapolations) C. B. Lang 2006. Baryons. C. B. Lang 2006 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: christi253
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Excited Hadrons: Lattice results


1
Excited Hadrons Lattice results
Oberwölz, September 2006
  • Christian B. Lang
  • Inst. F. Physik FB Theoretische Physik
  • Universität Graz

In collaboration with T. Burch, C. Gattringer,
L.Y. Glozman, C. Hagen, D. Hierl and A. Schäfer
PR D 73 (2006) 017502 hep-lat/0511054 PR D 73
(2006) 094505 hep-lat/0601026 PR D 74 (2006)
014504 hep-lat/0604019
BernGrazRegensburgQCD collaboration
2
Lattice simulation with Chirally Improved Dirac
actions
  • Quenched lattice simulation results
  • Hadron ground state masses
  • p/K decay constants
  • fp96(2)(4) MeV), fK106(1)(8) MeV
  • Quark masses
  • mu,d4.1(2.4) MeV, ms101(8) MeV
  • Light quark condensate -(286(4)(31) MeV)3
  • Pion form factor
  • Excited hadrons
  • Dynamical fermions
  • First results on small lattices

BGR (2004)
Gattringer/Huber/CBL (2005)
Capitani/Gattringer/Lang (2005)
CBL/Majumdar/Ortner (2006)
3
Lattice simulation with Chirally Improved Dirac
actions
  • Quenched lattice simulation results
  • Hadron ground state masses
  • p/K decay constants
  • fp96(2)(4) MeV), fK106(1)(8) MeV
  • Quark masses
  • mu,d4.1(2.4) MeV, ms101(8) MeV
  • Light quark condensate -(286(4)(31) MeV)3
  • Pion form factor
  • Excited hadrons
  • Dynamical fermions
  • First results on small lattice

BGR (2004)
Gattringer/Huber/CBL (2005)
Capitani/Gattringer/Lang (2005)
CBL/Majumdar/Ortner (2006)
4
Motivation
  • Little understanding of excited states from
    lattice calculations
  • Non-trivial test of QCD
  • Classification!
  • Role of chiral symmetry?
  • Its a challenge

5
Quenched Lattice QCD
QCD on Euclidean lattices
Quark propagators
t
6
Quenched Lattice QCD
QCD on Euclidean lattices
quenched approximation
Quark propagators
t
7
Quenched Lattice QCD
QCD on Euclidean lattices
quenched approximation
Quark propagators
t
8
The lattice breaks chiral symmetry
  • Nogo theorem Lattice fermions cannot have
    simultaneously
  • Locality, chiral symmetry, continuum limit of
    fermion propagator
  • Original simple Wilson Dirac operator breaks the
    chiral symmetry badly
  • Duplication of fermions, no chiral zero modes,
    spurious small eigenmodes (problems to simulate
    small quark masses)
  • But the lattice breaks chiral symmetry only
    locally
  • Ginsparg Wilson equation for lattice Dirac
    operators
  • Is related to non-linear realization of chiral
    symmetry (Lüscher)
  • Leads to chiral zero modes!
  • No problems with small quark masses

9
The lattice breaks chiral symmetry locally
  • Nogo theorem Lattice fermions cannot have
    simultaneously
  • Locality, chiral symmetry, continuum limit of
    fermion propagator
  • Original simple Wilson Dirac operator breaks the
    chiral symmetry badly
  • Duplication of fermions, no chiral zero modes,
    spurious small eigenmodes (problems to simulate
    small quark masses)
  • But the lattice breaks chiral symmetry only
    locally
  • Ginsparg Wilson equation for lattice Dirac
    operators
  • Is related to non-linear realization of chiral
    symmetry (Lüscher)
  • Leads to chiral zero modes!
  • No problems with small quark masses

10
GW-type Dirac operators
  • Overlap (Neuberger)
  • Perfect (Hasenfratz et al.)
  • Domain Wall (Kaplan,)
  • We use Chirally Improved fermions

This is a systematic (truncated) expansion
Gattringer PRD 63 (2001) 114501 Gattringer
/Hip/CBL., NP B697 (2001) 451
. . .
obey the Ginsparg-Wilson relations approximately
and have similar circular shaped Dirac operator
spectrum (still some fluctuation!)
11
Quenched simulation environment
  • Lüscher-Weisz gauge action
  • Chirally improved fermions
  • Spatial lattice size 2.4 fm
  • Two lattice spacings, same volume
  • 203x32 at a0.12 fm
  • 163x32 at a0.15 fm
  • (100 configs. each)
  • Two valence quark masses (mumd varying, ms
    fixed)
  • Mesons and Baryons

12
Usual method Masses from exponential decay
13
Hadron masses pion
mres0.002
GMOR
(quenched)
BGR, Nucl.Phys. B677 (2004)
Mp280 MeV
14
Interpolators and propagator analysis
Propagator sum of exponential decay terms
excited states (smaller t)
ground state (large t)
Previous attempts biased estimators (Bayesian
analysis), maximum entropy,... Significant
improvement Variational analysis
15
Variational method
(Michael Lüscher/Wolff)
  • Use several interpolators
  • Compute all cross-correlations
  • Solve the generalized eigenvalue problem
  • Analyse the eigenvalues
  • The eigenvectors are fingerprints over
    t-ranges
  • For tgtt0 the eigenvectors allow to trace the
    state composition from high to low quark masses
  • Allows to cleanly separate ghost contributions
    (cf. Burch et al.)

16
Interpolating fields (I)
Inspired from heavy quark theory Baryons
Mesons
i.e., different Dirac structure of interpolating
hadron fields..
(plus projection to parity)
17
Interpolating fields (II)
However
are not sufficient to identify the Roper state
excited states have nodes!
? smeared quark sources of different widths
(n,w) using combinations like nw nw, ww nnn,
nwn, nww etc.
18
Mesons
19
Effective mass examplemesons
20
Mesons type
pseudoscalar
vector
4 interpolaters ng5n, ng4g5n, ng4g5w, wg4g5w
21
Mesons type
pseudoscalar
vector
4 interpolaters ng5n, ng4g5n, ng4g5w, wg4g5w
22
Meson summary (chiral extrapolations)
23
Baryons
24
Nucleon (uud)
Level crossing (from - - to - - )?
Roper
Positive parity w(ww)(1,3), w(nw)(1,3) ,
n(ww)(1,3) Negative parity w(n,n)(1,2),
n(nn)(1,2)
25
Masses (1)
26
Masses (2)
27
Eigenvectors fingerprints
Nucleon Positive parity states
ground state
1st excitation
2nd excitation
28
Mass dependence of eigenvector (at t4)
c1w(nw) c1n(ww) c1w(ww)
c3w(nw) c3n(ww) c3w(ww)
29
S (uus)
Positive parity w(ww)(1,3), w(nw)(1,3) ,
n(ww)(1,3) Negative parity w(n,n)(1,2),
n(nn)(1,2)
30
X (ssu)
?
?
Positive parity w(ww)(1,3), w(nw)(1,3) ,
n(ww)(1,3) Negative parity w(n,n)(1,2),
n(nn)(1,2)
31
L octet (uds )
Positive parity w(ww)(1,3), w(nw)(1,3) ,
n(ww)(1,3) Negative parity w(n,n)(1,2),
n(nn)(1,2)
32
D (uuu ), W(sss)
?
?
Positive/Negative parity n(nn), w(nn), n(wn),
w(nw), n(ww), w(ww)
33
Baryon summary (chiral extrapolations)
34
Baryon summary (chiral extrapolations)
Bold predictions
  • W 1st excited state, pos.parity 2300(70) MeV
  • W ground state, neg.parity 1970(90) MeV
  • X ground state, neg.parity 1780(90) MeV
  • X 1st excited stated, neg.parity 1780(110) MeV

35
Summary and outlook
  • Method works
  • Large set of basis operators
  • Non-trivial spatial structure
  • Ghosts cleanly separated
  • Applicable for dynamical quark configurations
  • Physics
  • Larger cutoff effects for excited states
  • Positive parity excited states too high
  • Negative parity states quite good
  • Chiral limit seems to affect some states strongly
  • Further improvements
  • Further enlargement of basis, e.g. p-wave sources
    (talk by C. Hagen) and non-fermionic
    interpolators (mesons)
  • Studies at smaller quark mass

36
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com