Title: The Death and Life of Great American Cities
1The Death and Life of Great American Cities
- - or -
- How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Civic
Association Meetings
2Urban Renewal Theory - Basics
- Attempt to revitalize urban centers
- 1930s 1970s, Championed by Robert Moses
- His view on urban planning Cities are for
traffic. - Focused on economically depressed portions of
cities, mainly in inner city slums - Promoted the building of bridges, housing
projects on large campuses, sometimes with open
green spaces
3Urban Renewal Theory - Context
- Segregation was socially and legally sanctioned
- Racial deed restrictions on housing
- Redlining -- a common way to restrict housing
choices for many ethnic groups
4Urban Renewal Theory - Results
- Planners did not take into account the organic
way in which cities grow to serve their residents - Little consideration was given to preserving
businesses, leading to further economic
degradation of the area - Bridges were built with no regard to existing
neighborhoods - Eminent Domain was routinely used to acquire land
for development - Promoted urban sprawl by relocating large
populations - People were moved to projects, which were
separated not only from other populations of the
city, but from economic centers as well
5Jane Jacobs
- Her view on urban planning Cities are for
people. - Pro-neighborhood activist
- Passionate critic of Robert Moses
- Death and Life was one of the first critiques
on Urban Renewal and still stands as one of the
most influential texts on urban planning
6Cities According to Jacobs
- City streets and sidewalks -- make a neighborhood
functional - Short city blocks -- encourage pedestrian travel
- Diversity in architecture -- provides a range of
rent - Diverse economic opportunities -- necessary for a
vibrant city
7City Streets and Sidewalks
- Residents must feel comfortable on the streets
outside their homes at all times of day - Sidewalk traffic and social interaction from
porches promotes neighborhood security - When people use streets and sidewalks, they are
more invested in their community and contribute
to a large network of eyes that patrol the
street. - Children playing on sidewalks with heavily used
streets are more monitored than those playing in
designated recreational/park areas
8Short City Blocks
- Shorter blocks provide more route choices
- Longer blocks result in a street being isolated.
People will choose not to use a longer block
because there are very few places they can choose
to go - Short blocks allow for more social interaction
and economic diversity
9Diversity in Architecture
- Results in a neighborhood with mixed-use
buildings - Older buildings provide units with lower rent
while newer buildings provide units with higher
rent. - Increases diversity of the neighborhood and what
kind of activities the buildings are used for
10Diversity in Economy
- There must be various businesses which serve
residents and visitors at all hours of the day - Grocery stores, industry, manufacturing, bars,
clubs, restaurants, churches, schools and other
uses must be present for a vibrant neighborhood - Some businesses will provide street traffic
during the day (stores, churches, schools,
offices) and some will operate at night
(restaurants, clubs, bars, etc). - Twenty-four hour use of the streets means someone
has a stake in neighborhood safety at all times
and will result in better monitoring
11Cities are for traffic.
- Unfortunately, this is the attitude that still
exists today with urban planners, local
government, and metropolitan transit authorities - Projects are often evaluated solely upon
construction costs - Little importance is given to the value of
businesses and residential areas when calculating
project costs
12Case Study -- Harrisburg Underpass
- An underpass would
- Promote more activity on the street
- Create shorter pedestrian-friendly blocks
- Preserve historical architecture along Harrisburg
- Encourage business
13Traffic Issues for the East End
- Though we are located directly east of downtown,
Highway 59 runs between our neighborhood and
downtown Houston - We are also bordered to the south by the Gulf
Freeway (US 45) - When 59 was first constructed, there were several
streets which allowed traffic to flow from the
East End to downtown - Because of construction of the George R. Brown
Convention Center, MinuteMaid Park, and the
Toyota Center, only four arterials are left open
between downtown and our neighborhood - The city is going to build a soccer stadium in
downtown, which will result in another of these
arterials being closed off - We are concerned that traffic in and out of
downtown from our neighborhood will effectively
be cut off
14Light Rail in the East End
- The Houston Metropolitan Transit Authority
(Metro) is also building a light rail line
connecting the East End to downtown, the
University of Houston, Rice University, the
Medical Center, and the Galleria Area, a huge
complex of stores, restaurants, and entertainment
venues - The East End has been very supportive of the
building of the light rail line, unlike some
other neighborhoods in the city - This line will provide a needed means of
transportation in and out of downtown
15A Picture of Harrisburg
- Harrisburg Blvd is one of the major east-west
arterials of our neighborhood - This street is lined with mechanic shops,
homeless shelters, banks, restaurants, a coffee
manufacturing plant, masa factories, clothing
stores, municipal works buildings, pharmacies,
pawn shops, schools, dollar stores, legal
offices, a dialysis clinic, tattoo parlors, and
other businesses - Local business leaders have been pursuing
development along Harrisburg that would be
similar in nature to the River Walk in San
Antonio, Texas. This would be a tourist
destination with shops, restaurants, and
entertainment venues which would be purely
pedestrian in nature
16Need for Grade Separation
- We are located very close to the Houston Ship
Channel, and because of this, there is a lot of
freight traffic through the neighborhood - A Union Pacific-owned freight rail line crosses
Harrisburg at street level - This rail line can have freight traffic at any
time of day - There are no sidewalks and it is dangerous for
pedestrians to cross here - If a train is sitting on the track, emergency
vehicles must go out of their way to find a
street with a grade separation in order to go
from one side of the neighborhood to the other - The new construction for the light rail line has
made it necessary to pursue grade separation
17Underpass Streets and Sidewalks
- This location will have light rail stations half
a mile away in both directions - Perfect chance to promote pedestrian-friendly
businesses (bookstores, cafes, specialty shops) - People who ride the light rail will not be
traveling in their cars, so they will need
pedestrian-friendly infrastructure
18Underpass City Blocks
- The underpass would be half as long as the
proposed bridge - The bridge would create a 2000-foot-long barrier
to pedestrians and residents - Building the bridge would require closing
businesses and cutting off access to others - Bridges can provide shelter for people who dont
want to be seen
19Underpass Architecture
- The underpass would work with plans to create a
River Walk-type atmosphere in the neighborhood - Historical architecture that would need to be
demolished for a bridge could be saved
20Underpass Economy
- About 30 businesses along Harrisburg would have
to close in order for the bridge to be
constructed - Bridge will shut off 2000 feet to
resident/neighborhood-friendly business
development (coffee shops, restaurants,
bookstores, parks) - These are the types of things which would
normally be sparked by light rail investment - Harrisburg Merchants Association have already
spent 26 million rejuvenating area. Plans to
spend much more.
21Metros Plan
- Metro initially said that it would be impossible
to cross the UPRR because Union-Pacific would not
cooperate with them - They proposed that the light rail line stop at
the UPRR - According to this plan, the Magnolia Transit
Center, which is further east on Harrisburg and
serves many residents of the community, would no
longer connect to the light rail system - The community demanded that Metro design a grade
separation in order to reach the transit center
22Metros Solution
- Metro announced that the only way they could
cross the UPRR was to build an overpass - Because the warehouses in the area need certain
streets to remain open, the bridge will need to
be very long - Because the freight trains that use the rail
sometimes carry double-stacked train cars, the
bridge must be tall enough to clear these - Because of these considerations, the bridge that
Metro proposes will have to be 2000 feet long and
30 feet high
23Community Issues
- A bridge of this nature will result in noise and
air pollution being spread through the community - We will be left with dead space underneath the
bridge which might attract homeless people who
would otherwise go to one of the shelters on
Harrisburg - There are two light rail stations being built a
half-mile away from this location in both
directions. It is rational to assume that if
someone is riding the light rail, they wont be
driving a car - Traffic studies have shown that people are very
reticent to walk up bridges. Pedestrian users of
the light rail will most likely not use this
bridge. Residents will most likely not use this
bridge - Metro will need to demolish businesses and houses
alongside the bridge - Businesses in the future will choose not to buy
property along the overpass, resulting in
economic depression - Because of all these reasons, the community asked
Metro to consider building an underpass at this
location
24Metros Reply
- After hearing all of this, Metro responded by
stating that an underpass would be
exponentially more expensive than an overpass - Official quote
- Underpass 67 80 million
- Overpass 45 million
- Metro refused to release any documentation on
where they were getting these figures, who was
providing them with these figures, or what they
were basing their numbers on
25A Lucky Break
- The engineers at the Citizen Transportation
Coalition did not think these numbers sounded
accurate and began doing some research - They were attempting to compile estimates for
similar underpasses that have been built around
the country - What they found was a 2004 Harris County Freight
Rail Grade Separation study that had been
conducted on the EXACT SAME INTERSECTION and
found that this location would be ideal for an
underpass - Their quote for the underpass was 16 million
26Metros Scare Tactics
- Instead of reconsidering their proposal, Metro
states that if an underpass is demanded, they
will not continue the light rail line past the
UPRR - Many of the civic clubs of the East End cave and
release statements that the light rail is more
important than the type of grade separation at
the UPRR - Metro maintains that the overpass will not have a
detrimental economic affect or change the
character of the neighborhood
27East End Chamber of Commerce
- One of our civic club members persuades the East
End Chamber of Commerce to create a Light Rail
sub-committee, which consists of local business
owners, community members, and representatives of
the Citizen Transportation Coalition - The EECOC works to get a consensus among all the
civic associations in the area that the underpass
is the communitys preferred method of grade
separation
28Talks with Metro
- At this point, Metro agrees to allow our
engineers to meet with Metro project heads - Though our engineers point out flaws in their
assumptions, the Metro engineers do not revise
their estimates - After several meetings with Metro, the community
has all but conceded to the building of an
overpass
29Enter the Media!
- I begin writing letters to every English and
Spanish media organization in the city - The story is picked up by the Houston Press,
Channel 13 Eyewitness News, and the Chronicle - This media attention informs many more members of
our community about the issue - At a city council meeting in January, we make our
case and gain some support from local
representatives
30Its Also and Election Year
- Councilmember Peter Brown, who is running for
mayor this year, decides to make this a main
campaign issue - Brown contacts a civil engineering firm to make a
more cost-effective underpass design - The engineers return with a new design and
estimate the underpass at 52 million
31More Attention
- After an outpouring of community support for an
underpass, Congressman Gene Greene says he will
do all he can to get federal funding specifically
for an underpass - Harris Countys head engineer reviews Metros
itemized bid and notes several errors in unit
prices - These errors resulted in Metros estimate for an
underpass being ten to fifteen million dollars
more than it should have been
32Civic Club Meeting with Metro
- At our March civic association meeting, Metro
made a presentation trying to convince us that
there was little difference between an underpass
and an overpass in terms of community impact - Metro could not counter arguments that the
closing of businesses will result in a loss of
economic development for the neighborhood and tax
revenue for the city - The civic association adopts a resolution stating
that an underpass is the only grade separation
that will benefit the community
33The next day
- The mayor calls our council member and says that
an overpass is officially off the table for a
grade separation.
34Conclusion
- Though we have not gotten Metro to commit to
building an underpass yet, we are more confident
than ever that we will succeed - Metro has shown time and again that the
organization is overly concerned with the costs
of the project and does not factored in the loss
of business or tax revenue to its estimates - Metro did not take into account the affects this
bridge would have on the community while it was
being designed, and refused to consider another
design when these issues were brought to their
attention - Media attention was required in order to inform
the community of the situation - Community involvement was crucial to getting
local government leaders to take note of the
situation - Local political support might have been much
harder to come by if it had not been an election
year
35Conclusion
- Instead of urban design being based on reason,
logic, and the most effective ways to serve the
community, we have had to go through meetings
with engineers who had no intention of listening
to us, community leaders who were oppositional to
our cause, and constant rejection of logic and
reason on the parts of Metro engineers
36Conclusion
- Urban design as practiced by Metro is not based
on logic. - This organization is not swayed by reason.
- For citizens to realize change in urban design,
it is necessary to - have people in the engineering field who are
willing to volunteer their time for months of
meetings, conceptual drawings, fact checking - an active civic association
- community businesses working with residents
- media attention
- have the social capital required to navigate this
intimidating political process