Title: Study designs in air pollution epidemiology
1Study designs in air pollution epidemiology
- A/Prof Bin Jalaludin
- MBBS MPH PhD MRCP (UK) FAFPHM
- South Western Sydney Area Health Service, and
- University of New South Wales
- Dr Geoff Morgan
- BSc DipED PhD
- Northern Rivers University Department of Rural
Health - - University of Sydney, and Northern Rivers Area
Health Service
2This talk
- Study designs in air pollution epidemiology
- Strengths and weaknesses of study designs
- Illustrative examples including brief
discussion of statistical methods
3http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
4http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
5Exposure Assessment
- Generally from fixed site ambient monitors
- Fixed site ambient monitors only practical
solution when large numbers exposed - More practical/low cost personal exposure
monitoring data becoming available - The weak link in epidemiological studies
- EPAs regulate ambient air pollution so exposure
response estimates relating to ambient exposure
are required
6Determinants of exposure, dose and biologically
effective dose that underlie the development of
health effects (Modified from Jaakkola et al.,
1994)
7Pollutant Exposure (External dose)
Susceptibility Factors Internal Dose Susceptibil
ity Factors Metabolites, Adducts,
or Biologically Effective Dose Susceptibility
Factors
Early Biological Effects Altered Structure and
Function Ultimately Clinical Disease
8Types of studies
- Animal studies
- Human studies
- Experimental (chamber studies)
- Epidemiological (or observational)
- Cross-sectional
- Case-control
- Cohort
- Time series
- Quasi-experimental
9Epidemiological studies of air pollution
- Aggregated data
- Geographical (spatial) observation unit
- Cross sectional
- Temporal observation unit
- Time Series Study
- Individual data
- Cross sectional (sometimes with spatial studies)
- Panel studies (diary studies)
- Cohort Studies
10Holgate ST, Samet JM, Koren HS, editors. Air
Pollution and Health. UK Academic Press 1999.
11Study Designs
(Sheppeard 2003)
12Animal studies
- Easier and cheaper
- Can use higher exposures
- Can use precise mix of pollutants
- Can control most variables
- Fewer ethical issues
- BUT
- ??Extrapolation to humans
13Experimental studies
- Also known as chamber studies
- NO2, SO2 and O3
- Often directed at understanding mechanisms of
injury - Endpoints studied
- pulmonary function
- airway hyperresponsiveness
- airway inflammation
14Strengths of experimental studies
- Opportunity to create controlled and standardized
environments - Can be standardized to particular workloads,
breathing patterns, types of exposure (single
pollutant or more complex mixtures of gases),
durations of exposure and number of exposures
15Strengths of experimental studies (cont)
- Low concentrations with long duration exposures
can be studied (to mimic ambient environments) as
well as high concentrations with long durations
(to mimic worse case scenarios) - Dose-response information can be generated
- Interaction between two or more pollutants can be
investigated by varying the concentrations of
each of the pollutants
16Strengths of experimental studies (cont)
- Minimization of bias
- Randomization, double blinding and controlled
measurements of exposure and outcome factors
ensure greater internal validity - Results are more pertinent than results from
animal studies as there often are intra- and
inter-species differences
17Weaknesses of experimental studies
- A small number of, usually healthy, adult
volunteer subjects - Hence, small, but important, changes may not be
able to be detected - Extrapolation and generalisability of results to
the general population and in particular to high
risk subgroups may not be possible
18Weaknesses of experimental studies (cont)
- Most often only single pollutants are studied
- Concentrations studied are usually higher than
that encountered in the ambient environment - Chronic effects cannot be readily addressed
19The effect of ozone on pulmonary function (after
Kleinman et al., 1989)
20Aims of epidemiological studies
- to determine if air pollution poses a hazard to
human health (Causality) - to characterise the relationship between the
level of exposure and the response (Dose-response
relationship) - to examine responses in potentially susceptible
populations (Subgroup analyses)
21Answers the complementary policy questions
- does the pollutant pose a hazard to human health?
- at what level of exposure are the risks
acceptable? - which groups need special consideration because
of susceptibility?
22Strengths of epidemiological studies
- Real people
- Usual environment
- Exposed to typical mixtures of air pollution
(often complex mixtures)
23Weaknesses of epidemiological studies
- Most studies report only acute effects (cheaper
and easier to do than studies investigating
chronic effects which may be of greater public
health importance)
24Weaknesses of epidemiological studies (cont)
- Provide little information about biological
mechanisms - Little information about the correlations between
ambient and personal exposures - Difficulty in modelling highly correlated risk
factors - Unable to explore contribution of PM size and
composition
25Issues in the interpretation of epidemiological
studies
- Biases - selection and measurement
- Confounders weather, pollens
- Low concentrations of pollutants
- Multi-pollutant exposures complex mixtures
- Different air pollution metrics
- Different outcome measures
- Different statistical models
26Health outcome measures in studies of air
pollution
27Some other health endpoints of interest
- Cardiovascular disease (AMI, heart failure)
- ECG changes
- Hospital admissions
- Mortality
- Perinatal outcomes
- Birth weight and gestational age
- Neonatal and infant mortality
- Cancer incidence lung cancer
28Panel studies
- Also known as diary studies
- Panel of subjects keeping daily diaries
- An example would be asthma diaries
- Exposures
- measured at the ecological level
- Outcomes
- measured at the individual level
29Acute effects of low levels of ambient ozone on
peak expiratory flow rate in a cohort of
Australian children Bin B Jalaludina,b, Tien
Cheya,b, Brian I O'Toolec,d, Wayne T Smithe,
Anthony G Caponf and Stephen R Leederd,g IJE
200029549-557
30Aim
- To determine associations between ambient air
pollution and lung function in children with
asthma
31Methods
- Children in the study were from six primary
schools in west and southwest Sydney - Each selected school was closest to an EPA air
quality monitoring station - Daily asthma diaries
- Daily air pollution concentrations
32Location of EPA air monitoring stationsWestern
Sydney Childrens Asthma Study 1994
33Mean daytime ozone and evening lung function,
Western Sydney Childrens Asthma Study
34Mean PM10 and evening lung function, Western
Sydney Childrens Asthma Study 1994-1995
35(No Transcript)
36Conclusions
- Significant negative association between mean
daytime ozone and lung function - No association between mean PM10 and lung
function - No association between mean NO2 and lung function
37Asthma camp associations between O3 levels and
both peak flow lung function change and asthma
exacerbations (as indicated by ?-agonist
medication use) (Thurston et al., 1997)
38Time Series Studies
- Late 1980s
- Advances in statistical techniques
- Advances in computing technology
- Able to detect small effects
- Outcome and exposure aggregated over 1 day
- Investigate short term/acute effects of air
pollution only (not chronic/long term effects)
39Time Series Studies
- Strengths
- not confounded by personal risk factors (eg
smoking, SES, diet) - inexpensive (use routinely collected data)
- Weaknesses
- potential confounding by other environmental
factors (eg season, weather, epidemics) - potential bias due to aggregated exposure (ie
exposure missclassification)
40Time series studies
- Commonly used study design
- Uses routinely collected exposure and outcome
data - Outcomes studied include mortality,
hospitalisations, emergency department
presentations, general practitioner visits - Both exposure and outcome measured at the
ecological level
41Sydney Time Series Studies
- American Journal of Public Health, 1998
88759-764. Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in
Sydney, Australia, 1989 through 1993. G Morgan et
al - American Journal of Public Health, 1998
881761-1766. Air Pollution and Daily Hospital
Admissions in Sydney, Australia, 1990 to 1994. G
Morgan et al - Epidemiology 14(5)S111, 2003. The effects of low
level air pollution on daily mortality and
hospital admissions in Sydney, Australia, 1994 to
2000. Morgan G et al - Epidemiology 14(5)S107, 2003. Associations
between ambient air pollution and daily emergency
department presentations for respiratory disease
and cardiovascular disease in the elderly (65
years), Sydney, Australia. Jalaludin B et al
42Sydney Mortality Time Series Study
- Aim
- This study examined the effects of outdoor air
pollutants in Sydney, Australia, on daily
mortality. - Methods
- Time-series analysis on counts of daily mortality
and major outdoor air pollutants (PM10, PM2.5,
ozone, NO2, CO, SO2) in Sydney (1994 to 2001) - Adjusted for seasonal and cyclical factors
- Poisson regression
- Semi parametric smoothing
43http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
44Sydney Metropolitan Study Region
45(No Transcript)
46Time Series Modelling Strategy
Daily Deaths
long term trend
seasonal trends
weather (temp humidity)
day of the week
public / school holidays
influenza episodes
air pollution
Statistical Model (GAM/GLM)
- Poisson distribution (counts of daily deaths)
- Control for overdispersion and autocorrelation
47(No Transcript)
48- Results - Mortality
- both PM10 and PM2.5 are associated with all
cause and cardiovascular mortality, primarily in
the cool season - both PM10 and PM2.5 are associated with
respiratory mortality, primarily in the warm
season at lags greater than 6 days - ozone is associated with all cause,
cardiovascular and respiratory mortality,
primarily in the warm season when concentrations
are highest.
49- Results - Hospital admissions
- both PM10 and PM2.5 associated with all
cardiovascular, ischemic heard disease, and all
respiratory admissions 65 years, primarily in
the cool season with PM2.5 showing the stronger
associations - CO and NO2 are strongly associated with all
cardiovascular admissions and ischemic heart
disease admissions in both the cool and warm
season - CO and NO2 are strongly associated with all
respiratory admissions 65 years in both the cool
and warm season - PM2.5 and NO2 are strongly associated with
childhood asthma admissions 1-14 years,
particularly in the warm season with the effects
decreasing at higher lags.
50Conclusions
- Current levels of air pollution in Sydney are
associated with daily mortality, hospital
admissions, and hospital ED attendance
51Time Series Multi city Studies
http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
52http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
53http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
54NMMAPS 90 US Cities City and Regional
Estimates
http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/
55Time Series Studies - Multi City
- Improved precision of estimate
- Different studies can use different
- Health outcomes
- Exposures
- Statistical models
56Time Series Mortality Effect Estimates
- Meta Analysis estimates (1990s)
- 10ug/m3 increase in PM10 produces a 1 increase
in daily mortality - Recent Meta/Pooled Analysis estimates (2000s)
- NMMAPS study of 90 US cities
- 10ug/m3 inc in PM10 produces a 0.4 inc in daily
mortality - APHEA study of 6 Western European cities
- 10ug/m3 inc in PM10 produces a 0.6 inc in daily
mortality
57Australian Multi-City Time Series Studies
- Epidemiology 14(5)S32, 2003. The short-term
effects of air pollution on mortality A meta
analysis for 4 Australian cities. Simpson R et al
- Epidemiology 14(5)S33, 2003. The short-term
effects of air pollution on respiratory
admissions A meta analysis for 4 Australian
cities. Simpson R et al - Epidemiology 14(5)S33, 2003. The short-term
effects of air pollution on cardiovascular
admissions A meta analysis for 4 Australian
cities. Simpson R et al
58Australian Multi City Study
59Case crossover studies
- Case control analogue of the crossover study
- For each case, one or more time periods are
chosen as the control periods for the case - The exposure status at the time of disease onset
is compared with the distribution of exposure
status for that same individual - Assumption that neither exposures or confounders
are changing over time in a systematic way
60Case crossover studies (cont)
- The exposure must vary over time within
individuals rather than stay constant - The exposure must have a short induction time and
a transient effect - Each case is his/her own control and all non-time
varying confounders (whether measured or not) are
controlled in the analysis
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63(No Transcript)
64Reanalysis of the Effects of Air Pollution on
Daily Mortality in Seoul, Korea A Case-Crossover
DesignJong-Tae Lee1 and Joel Schwartz2 EHP
1999107(8)633-636
65(No Transcript)
66(No Transcript)
67(No Transcript)
68Cross sectional study
- Comparing serveral (more than two) geographical
areas - Difficult to control for confounders
69- Outdoor air pollution and children's
respiratory symptoms in the steel cities of New
South Wales - Peter R Lewis, Michael J Hensley, John
Wlodarczyk, Ruth C Toneguzzi, Victoria J
Westley-Wise, Trevor Dunn and Dennis Calvert MJA
1998 169 459-463
70Objective
- To investigate the relationship between outdoor
air pollution and the respiratory health of
children aged 8 to 10 years
71Methods
- A cross-sectional survey (between October 1993
and December 1993) of children's health and home
environment. Summary measures of particulate
pollution PM10 and SO2 were estimated for each
area (using air quality monitoring station data
from July 1993 to June 1994)
72Survey participants
- Parents of 3023 primary school children (Years 3,
4 and 5) from industrial and non-industrial areas
with air quality monitoring stations in the
Hunter and Illawarra regions of New South Wales
73Main outcome measures
- Reported occurrence of four or more chest colds,
four or more attacks of wheezing, and night-time
cough without a cold for more than two weeks, all
within the previous 12 months
74Study areas
75Results
- 77 response rate (range 66 to 88)
- The average annual outdoor air pollution for the
nine areas was 18.6-43.7 µg/m for PM10 and
0.16-0.90 pphm for SO2 - No significant association with SO2
- Significant association per 10 µg/m increase in
PM10 for chest colds (OR1.43) and night-time
cough (OR1.34), but not wheeze -
76Symptoms and PM10
77Conclusions
- Evidence of health effects at lower than expected
levels of outdoor air pollution PM10 in the
Australian setting
78Cohort studies
- Few such studies
- None from Australia
- Two study designs
- Initiation of new cohorts specifically to study
air pollution effects - Utilising existing cohorts
79Southern Californian Childrens Health Study
(Gauderman 2002)
- To study chronic effects of air pollution
- 10-yr study that commenced in 1992
- 5,500 children in 12 communities
- Annual questionnaire and lung function measures
- Air quality measured outdoors, in schools and in
homes
80(No Transcript)
81(No Transcript)
82Initial findings
- A clear correlation between lower lung function
and more intense air pollution. The effect was
more pronounced in girls who reported spending
the most time outdoors. - High levels of NO2, PM10 and PM2.5, and acid
vapour appeared to be associated with slower lung
growth. - Lung capacity was lower for girls living in the
most polluted communities, especially those with
the highest levels of NO2 and PM. - Wheezing was more evident in boys who were
exposed to higher levels of NO2 and acid vapour.
- Ozone did not appear to affect lung function
growth. - Girls with asthma who lived in communities with
high ozone levels had lower lung capacity. - Boys appear to have lower breathing capacity if
they lived in communities with high ozone levels,
provided they also spent above average time
outdoors (where ozone concentrations are higher).
83- Box 2 Summary of the major findings from the
Southern California Childrens Health Study - Associations were found between
- Wheeze and NO2 (Males only)
- Decreased MMEF, PEFR and O3 (Females only)
- Decreased FVC, FEV1, MMEF, and PM10 and NO2
(Females only) - Lung function growth and PM10, PM2.5, and NO2
(fourth grade cohort) - Lung function and acid vapour, and NO2
- Increased risk of developing asthma and O3 (in
children who played three or more team sports) - School absences (respiratory related) and O3.
84Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and
Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air
Pollution C. Arden Pope III, PhD Richard T.
Burnett, PhD Michael J. Thun, MD Eugenia E.
Calle, PhD Daniel Krewski, PhD Kazuhiko Ito,
PhD George D. Thurston, ScD JAMA. 20022871132
-1141.
85Aims
- To assess the relationship between long-term
exposure to fine particles and and all-cause,
lung cancer and cardiopulmonary mortality
86Methods
- Part of Cancer Prevention II Study
- Enrolled 1.2 million adults in 1982
- Baseline questionnaire collected individual
information (age, sex, weight, height, smoking
history, etc) - 500,000 subjects risk factors linked to air
pollution data and deaths through to 1998 - Study population drawn from from 157 cities
throughout the USA(ie 157 data points)
87(No Transcript)
88(No Transcript)
89Conclusions
- PM2.5 associated with all cause, lung cancer and
cardiopulmonary mortality - PM10 and TSP not consistently associated with
mortality - Long term exposure to combustion related PM2.5 is
an important environmental risk factor for
cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality
90Epidemiological (observational) studies
- Study designs not commonly used
- Combination of designs in one study
- Exposure assessment (often weakest link)
- Coherence (Bates 1992)
- Causality (eg Hill 1965)
- Levels of evidence
- Drive criteria air pollutant standard setting
91Concept of coherence
- ?symptoms
- ?restricted activity days
- ?GP visits
- ?ED presentations
- ?hospital admissions
- ?deaths
92Criteria for assessing causality of associations
Data from Hill (1965) and Rothman (1986).
93Thank you
94http//biosun01.biostat.jhsph.edu/fdominic/ISRpap
er0920.pdf