Title: Proficiency Testing
1Proficiency Testing
- Alfred Baquiran Water Supply
- Susan Butts Water Pollution and DMRQA
2Brief Synopsis of PT Samples
- PT Providers no longer accredited by NIST
- Providers now approved by A2LA
- PT tables created by NELAC PT Board which EPA
endorsed - PT tables located on our website
- WS and WP required, but RCRA may be next in the
near future
3Brief Synopsis of PT Samples
- WS and WP samples must be part of an official
study - Rapid response or quick turnaround samples are
not acceptable - Revised results are not acceptable, except when
the PT provider is in error
4Water SupplyNew Parameters Added for 2007
- Specific Conductance
- Heterotrophic Plate Count
- Additional analytes for WS PT could be added in
the future (enumeration of E. coli under LT2 rule)
5Water SupplyClarification of Organic PT
Requirements
- Volatiles and HAAs 80 of required compounds
must pass - Vinyl Chloride graded separately and must pass
for volatiles certification - THMs acceptable results required for all four
compounds - Any repeats must report all analytes
6Water SupplySome Common Problems
- Results reported with incorrect method number
- Results reported with incorrect or no EPA lab
code -
- This code is unique to each lab and required on
all reported results - Contact Charles Feldman at EPA to obtain an EPA
lab code (513) 569-7671
7Water SupplyMicrobiology Reporting Issue
- For total coliform/E. coli presence-absence
methods, simply report the correct method SM
9223B, Colisure, Colitag - Membrane filtration methods are slightly
different because a different method is used to
verify presence of E. coli - Example If the method number reported for total
coliform is 9222B, the method number 9221E should
also be reported because it is used to verify
presence of E. coli
8Water SupplyMiscellaneous Topics
- NELAC PT subcommittee has suggested changing
acceptance criteria for micro PTs - Recommended change is that laboratories must
obtain acceptable results for all 10 samples in
the PT - Analysis records for WS and WP PTs must be
available for review during an evaluation
9Water Pollution and DMRQA
10Water PollutionNew Parameters Added in 2007
- Trace Metals Barium, Boron, Hexavalent Chromium,
Tin - Microbiology Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform,
and Enterococci (MF and MPN methods) - Inorganics Surfactants (MBAS), Settleable
Solids, Total Solids, Turbidity, Sulfide,
Nitrate-Nitrite as N, Nitrite as N
11Water PollutionNew Parameters Added in 2007
- Organics
- Herbicides new parameter
- Pesticides additional compounds
- PCB 1221
- Volatiles additional compounds
- Semi-volatiles Base/Neutrals and Acids new
parameter
12Water PollutionCommon Missing Parameters
- Turbidity
- Microbiological
- Semi-Volatiles
13Water PollutionPCB Issue
- For SC certification, two PCB samples are
required. - Two Options
- Some PT providers will send a two PCB sample set
- Must order two separate PCB samples from two
studies must be two different PCBs
14Water PollutionMethods Update Rule
- For 2007, both the old and new methods will be
accepted for reporting. - For 2008, the new method must be reported as
listed on your certificate.
15Water PollutionReporting Issues
- Reporting the correct method
- Using correct EPA Lab Code and SC Lab Code
- Each technology must be analyzed and reported
independently, e.g. EPA Methods 200.7 and 200.8
are two different technologies and must be
analyzed and reported as such
16DMRQAProcess for SCDHEC
- 1) Verification of receipt respond to EPA by
e-mail or mail -
- Please also respond to the DMRQA Coordinator
- 2) Order PT samples from studies
- closing within the study dates
17DMRQAProcess for SCDHEC
- 3) Gather data package which includes the
Permittee Data Report Forms, Chemistry/Microbiolog
y/WET checklists, and data. - Submit the completed data packages to PT
provider and DMRQA coordinator - - Due anytime during the study
18DMRQAProcess for SCDHEC
- 4) PT Provider will send final reports to the
DMRQA coordinator for review - 5) Negotiate any Not Acceptable data and
submit a Corrective Action Report to the DMRQA
Coordinator
19Common Problems with DMRQA-27
- More than one result for a parameter is being
reported - Results for multiple laboratories (includes
multiple contract laboratories and facility
laboratories) - Problem One laboratory may fail whereas the
other might pass corrective action is still
needed - Solution Report the data for the laboratory
that analyzes the majority of the NPDES samples
for the permit within the previous year
20Common Problems with DMRQA-27
- Multiple entries with multiple methods
- Report methods normally used for reporting NPDES
data on the monthly DMR - Only report parameters listed on your NPDES
permit - Purpose of DMRQA is to reflect what you normally
report on the monthly DMR
21Common Problems with DMRQA-27
- Two different studies reported for the same
laboratory one is failing one is passing - A Corrective Action Report must still be
submitted
22Common Problems with DMRQA-27
- EPA Lab Code is not listed or listed incorrectly
- Do not participate in the DMRQA study if not
required use a WP study - NPDES permit number not listed on Corrective
Action Report
23Common Problems with DMRQA-27
- Corrective Action Reports incomplete
- Must identify problem or reason for failed
results in report - Must submit the corrective action performed (not
just participation in a new study) - Submit copies of any Corrective Action Reports
from contract laboratories
24DMRQA-28Proposed Changes
- Study period extended
- May 1, 2008 through August 29, 2008
- Verification response April 11, 2008
- Language changed to specify that laboratories
must not be allowed to enter data for their
clients - Text changed throughout to avoid confusion
25Proposed Permittee Data Report Form Study 28
26Checklists for Study 28