Technology Acquisition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Technology Acquisition

Description:

1939 World's Fair: Futurama. GMC R&D, cont. Firebirds: gas turbine cars ... high costs typically buried by allocation over multiple business units ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1054
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: GM15
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology Acquisition


1
Technology Acquisition
  • Norm Thorpe
  • General Motors Corporation
  • April 22, 2002

2
Govt Funded RD Over Time
  • Pre-World War II
  • Air Corps Act of 1926
  • World War II
  • Manhattan Project
  • Post World War II (Cold War)
  • National Labs, NASA, DARPA
  • Post Cold War
  • Searching for solutions

3
Commercial RD over Time GMC
  • Technology Driving Market Success
  • Electric Starting/Lighting/Ignition
  • Interchangeable Parts
  • All steel bodies
  • Automatic Transmission
  • Diesel Electric Locomotive
  • 1939 Worlds Fair Futurama

4
GMC RD, cont
  • Firebirds gas turbine cars
  • Commercial gas turbine Class 8 trucks
  • Patriot Missile Gen sets
  • Electric Vehicles and Advanced Batteries
  • Fuel Cell Vehicles
  • Catalytic Converters
  • Light Weight Structures
  • Crash Test Dummies

5
Institutional RD Model
  • Large free standing research institutions
  • Academic outlook
  • Metrics papers published, patents obtained
  • Prestige factors, cadre of professionals
  • Cost center approach
  • high costs typically buried by allocation over
    multiple business units
  • Vertical integration Corp. self sufficiency

6
Commercial RD in C 21
  • Large institutional RD labs gone
  • or greatly reduced
  • Alternate solutions
  • leverage
  • at best cost share
  • worst case dilution of goals/results
  • transfer to suppliers
  • contract out
  • move expense down supply chain

7
GM Approach to RD
  • Advanced Technology Work ATW
  • Science Lab
  • Innovation Programs
  • WWP/Purchased RD/LOTM purchasing
  • Single Mission Challenge Teams
  • Product Engineering Centers
  • Collaborative Labs
  • USCAR

8
RD Acquisition Methods Continuum
  • Purchase Order
  • Modified P.O.s
  • Non evaluation commitments
  • IP flexibility
  • Joint RD Agreements
  • Teaming Agreements
  • Equity Relationships

9
Purchased RD and Engineering Services
  • Not joint RD
  • Not difficult or unusual
  • unless buyer is a government agency!
  • Engineering/RD in Source Selection
  • price/pay methodology
  • follows SOW
  • negotiated at market rates

10
Collaborative Labs
  • Universities
  • Institutions
  • Equity Partners
  • Automotive OEM Alliance Partners
  • Joint RD Partner Companies

11
Joint RD Agreements Non-Standard !
  • Embedded within larger relationships
  • Teaming Agreements
  • Equity Investments
  • Strategic Alliances
  • Consortia
  • Umbrella/Master agreements
  • Free standing projects
  • Walk before running?

12
Joint RD Agreements Variable Factors
  • Who is paying? Is there cost sharing?
  • Who is bringing IP? Other resources?
  • What is the pre-existing relationship?
  • What future relationship is expected?
  • Are there anti-trust issues?
  • Can program results be shared/allocated?
  • Is there a need for leadership by one party?

13
Joint RD Agreement Content
  • Statement of Purpose
  • Funding Agreements
  • Program Management Process
  • Competition Issues, if any
  • Confidentiality/Intellectual Property
  • SOW w/Payment Milestones, Deliverables
  • Legaleze

14
Joint RD Issues (Usual Suspects)
  • Confidentiality/Non-Confidentiality
  • Ownership/control/allocation of program IP
  • Commercialization issues
  • allocation of upside
  • access to/compensation for background IP
  • free riding competitors

15
Conclusion
  • Between companies, pricing issues are important
    as they effect budget, but are rarely
    controversial or difficult
  • Commercialization issues which are so difficult
    for collaborating companies, should be
    no-brainers for Govt/Corp
  • But only if govt negotiators are competent and
    empowered

16
And a modest proposal
  • Melt down RD Acquisition regs
  • Repour with goal of permitting user of new
    products/technologies to buy what is needed on
    terms necessary to get it
  • enforce business discipline by holding buyers
    accountable for success of their deals
  • de-emphasize pricing issues, focussing efforts on
    real issues in negotiation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com