The Praclay Heater Test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Praclay Heater Test

Description:

... a conservative way the most critical state and phenomena that could ... A characterisation programme of each part of the system. Modelling. Instrumentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: VV39
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Praclay Heater Test


1
The Praclay Heater Test
  • F. Bernier (ESV EURIDICE GIE)
  • E. Weetjens and X. Sillen (SCK.CEN)
  • URF HADES Conference
  • Mol, 27-29 January 2004

2
The EBS architecture for disposal of cat. C waste
has been reviewed
  • Three alternatives are considered
  • Supercontainer (SC)
  • Borehole
  • Sleeve
  • Choices has to be kept as flexible as possible to
    get the possibility to reorient parts of the
    design towards another alternative at minimal
    cost

3
Consequences on thePRACLAY experiment
  • Experience as initially planned specific to one
    detailed design will not be possible
  • PRACLAY has to be
  • Addressed to the three alternatives
  • Enlarged to characterisation, verification,
    confirmation and demonstration

4
The PRACLAY testspreliminary design
Heated part 30m
1m
10m
2 m
  • Heater Test
  • THM/C at large scale
  • H. Plug Test
  • Disposal gallery cut-off
  • Installation
  • Performance
  • Backfill Test
  • Fabrication
  • Installation
  • Performance
  • ESDRED - EC

Crossing Test - EDZ - no starting chamber
5
Main objectives of the heater test
  • Configuration similar to a real repository
  • Combined effect of the EDZ and the TDZ
  • Effect of the thermal load on the stability of
    the lining (retrievability)
  • Verification and confirmation of our knowledge of
    the THM/C behaviour of Boom Clay
  • Demonstration that the thermal load does not
    affect the performance of the Boom Clay layer

6
The test has some limitation
  • Short heating period (10 years) compared with a
    real repository
  • Different boundary conditons
  • Different heat source
  • No radioactive source
  • ..
  • The aim of the test is to reproduce in a
    conservative way the most critical state and
    phenomena that could occur in the host rock

7
Why a large scale heater?
  • Boom Clay is considered as the main barrier
  • Confidence building
  • Confirmation that BC behaves as predicted
  • Milestone for the disposal strategy
  • The thermal load is the most severe transient
    that the repository system will undergo on a
    large spatial scale and in a relatively short
    period of time
  • Results will not be affected with local
    heterogeneities

8
Case study showing the large scale impact of the
thermal load(Picard Giraud 1995)
200 m
Initial thermal flux 1W/m³
10 m
9
(No Transcript)
10
Experience from small-scale heater tests
  • CACTUS, CERBERUS, BACCHUS, ATLAS
  • The THM behaviour is quite consistent
  • ? T ? ? p, ?
  • dissipation of p and ? but ? in a smaller
    proportion
  • ? permeability and water content
  • ? density
  • consolidation

11
The large scale heater test will be
representative for all the designs
3D - Borehole design
2D SC and sleeve design
2 canisters per 5 m (201 W/m)
200 m
100 m
T in function of the distance from the source?
1 m
20 m
20 m
12
For X gt 2m the influence of the design on T is
very limited
13
Optimisation of the heat source
  • Accurate time-dependant heat output of HLW
  • will increase excessively the period of the test
  • The objective is to heat a large volume of clay
    within a period of 10 years to be representative
    in terms of maximal temperature and thermal
    gradient

14
Constant flux (290W/m ___ ) or Constant
temperature (90C - - -)?
T016C
15
30 m is considered for the length of the heat
source
16
Isotherms around the heaterare representative in
the central part
17
The heater test will be accompanied with
  • A characterisation programme of each part of the
    system
  • Modelling
  • Instrumentation
  • from the connecting gallery
  • radially to the PRACLAY gallery
  • temperature, displacements, pore water and total
    pressure, fracturation, water sampling (chemical
    analysis)

18
Planing
  • General design 2004
  • Characterisation programme 2005
  • Construction of the PRACLAY gallery and
    installation of tests 2006
  • Start of the heat phase 2007
  • Preliminary conclusions 2012
  • Start of the cooling phase 2017

19
Conclusions
  • The large scale thermal behaviour is a remaining
    key issue
  • Most severe impact that the repository will
    undergo
  • The whole thickness of Boom Clay will be affected
  • Milestone for the disposal strategy
  • Confidence building
  • Open to international cooperation
  • Design not yet fixed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com