Hurricane Class Plans

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Hurricane Class Plans

Description:

Hurricane Class Plans. Michael A. Walters FCAS, MAAA. CAS Ratemaking Seminar. March 11-12, 1999 ... For base class, use single house in each zip code at base coverage ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: michaela2
Learn more at: https://www.casact.org

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hurricane Class Plans


1
Hurricane Class Plans
  • Michael A. Walters FCAS, MAAA
  • CAS Ratemaking Seminar
  • March 11-12, 1999

2
Topics of Discussion
  • Why a separate class plan
  • How to create from a single model
  • How to use multiple sources
  • Deciding cost/effective class variables
  • Standards and considerations
  • Selecting a base class
  • Adjusting to new base class

3
Why a separate class plan?
  • Hurricane doesnt vary with traditional
    homeowners factors
  • Not by protection class
  • Not by policy form
  • Not the same way by construction,

    amount of insurance, deductible

4
How to use a single model
  • For base class, use single house in each zip code
    at base coverage
  • For each class, run model for single house by zip
    code
  • Track relationship to base by zip
  • Use mapping software to group similar zip code
    relationships
  • Publish relativities by zone or statewide

5
How to use multiple sources
  • Decide what variables to include
  • Survey sources for relativities
  • Use several zip codes around state
  • Delphi technique for outliers
  • Apply actuarial judgment
  • Peer review by engineering experts

6
Decide rating variables
  • Roof - shape, covering, waterproof sheathing,
    pitch, overhang
  • Connections - straps, nailing (size,spacing)
  • Windows and Doors - shuttering, garage door size
    bracing, glazing
  • House Features - stories, porches, construction
  • Environment - terrain, debris exposure

7
Standards
  • Homogeneous
  • No clear subsets of large different loss
    potential
  • Reasonably related to loss hazard
  • Well Defined
  • Exhaustive and mutually exclusive
  • No ambiguity in placement
  • No manipulation by insureds
  • Practical
  • Reasonable cost to administer
  • Able to be tested by actual loss data

8
Considerations
  • Prioritize items that insureds can change
  • Use results from mitigation programs
  • Combine categories to control number of classes
  • Measure interaction among variables
  • May need on-site survey by independent
    professionals

9
Selecting/Adjusting Base Class
  • Base Class
  • Generally the prevailing condition
  • Discounts for other classes
  • Sample gable roof, no shutters, no roof clips
  • Adjust Loss Costs to New Base
  • Estimate distributions of classes
  • Use class relativities to calculate off-balance

10
Base Class Assumptions (italics)
  • Roof
  • Shape - gable unbraced, gable braced, hip, flat
  • Cover - Shingle, tile, slate, metal, poured
    concrete
  • Waterproof sheathing underlayment - No, yes
  • Pitch - 30 degrees
  • Overhang - 36 inches
  • Connections
  • Hurricane Clips - No, yes at roof, at foundation
  • Sheathing Attachment - 6d nails, 8d nails

11
Base Class Assumptions (italics)
  • Windows and Doors
  • Shuttering - None, ordinary,

    hurricane resistant
    (debris impact)
  • Glass patio doors - Yes, no
  • Garage doors - single-wide, double-wide braced,
    unbraced
  • Laminated glass - No, yes

12
Base Class Assumptions (italics)
  • House Features
  • Number of stories - one, one
  • Porches/canopies/carports - Yes, no
  • Construction - frame, masonry reinforced?
  • Year Built/Code Enforcement - before 1995/not
    enforced, other
  • Environment
  • Suburban light tree cover, dense
  • Other - waterfront, urban, rural
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)