Grizzly Bear Research Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Grizzly Bear Research Project

Description:

Grizzly Bear Research Project – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: charlesb49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Grizzly Bear Research Project


1
Grizzly Bear Research Project
Foothills Model Forest
2
Why the Grizzly Bear?
  • The presence of grizzly bears is considered to
    be an indicator of a healthy ecosystem

3
Long Term Program Goal
  • To provide resource managers with the necessary
    knowledge and planning tools to ensure the
    long-term conservation of grizzly bears in
    Alberta.

4
Grizzly Bear Habitat
Changing landscapes and multiple uses
Status and trends
5
Grizzly habitat
Status and trends
6
Oil and gas sites in Alberta October 2001
Status and trends
7
The Challenge
The challenge of co-existence
  • Maintain grizzly bears over the long term in
    concert with sustainable development, and all
    human activities occurring in bear habitat

8
Grizzly Bear Range in Alberta
Approximately 228,000 km2
Status and trends
9
Key Elements of the Research Program
  • Cumulative effects models
  • Defining bear habitat, Measuring and quantifying
    landscape change
  • Bear movement
  • Status and trends - Health
  • Mortality/Reproduction
  • Linking landscape conditions to population status

10
Research Study Area
11
GPS Collars
  • GPS radio collars are deployed on bears to
    obtain six locations per day for the time period
    when bears are not denning

Status and trends
12
Vast amounts of location data
FMF Grizzly Bear Project 35,000 Locations 4
years
5 years
3 years
13
(No Transcript)
14
What has been learned to date?
  • Remember
  • Entering our last major year of field data
    collection
  • Many analysis still underway
  • Preliminary results will be confirmed/modified
    based on results of 5 years of data

15
Cumulative Effects Grizzly Bear Models
  • Originated in Yellowstone Park a protected
    areas land base
  • Have been adapted and largely accepted for other
    areas
  • Have received little testing and validation
  • Formed the basis for a portion of the EUB
    decision on the Cheviot Mine proposal

16
Three years of detailed grizzly bear data were
utilized to evaluate the CEA model outputs
17
Data from GPS collars 1999-2001
Data from Bears
  • 1999 collared 19
  • 2000 collared 21
  • 2001 collared 23

18
Bear Density by BMU
19
Human Use and Habitat Effectiveness
  • Output results show that changes in human use
    intensity have a significant effect on Habitat
    Effectiveness

Status and trends
20
Habitat Effectiveness and DNA Data
  • DNA data showing the number of unique bears found
    in each BMU was compared with the Habitat
    Effectiveness Output data

Results the model was a poor predictor of the
number of unique bears found relative to the HE
values
Status and trends
21
Habitat Effectiveness and GPS data
  • 24,000 GPS data points collected over a 3 year
    period were compared with the Habitat
    Effectiveness model output

Results showed that higher HE values were not
related to higher bear use
Status and trends
22
Security Areas
  • Analysis of security area model output also
    showed no correlation between areas of high
    security area values and bear use, or the number
    of bears found there

Status and trends
23
UNUSABLE
24
(No Transcript)
25
Grizzly Bear Movements
Movement Corridors
  • The linkage zone model output from the CEA proved
    to be a poor fit in predicting how bears move
    through their home ranges
  • A new approach using graph theory has proved to
    be a good predictor of bear movements

26
CEA Models have Poor Predictive Ability
  • Existing CEA model has poor predictive ability in
    terms of how bears are actually using the
    landscape
  • Our new approaches and models have proven to be
    more useful in predicting bear occurrence and
    movement in this area

Status and trends
27
Landscape Level Connections
Movement Corridors
28
Remote Sensing
Closed conifer Closed deciduous Mixed forest Open
conifer Open deciduous Alpine Herbaceous lt
1800m Herbaceous Reclamation Shrub Wet Open Wet
Treed Rock Snow Shadow Water Road / Rail
line Urban Recent cut Cut 3-12 yrs. Recent burn
Status and trends
29
2001 IDT Landcover Map
30
Change Detection 1999 2001
31
1999-2001 Change Features
  • 284km roads
  • 297ha mines
  • 128 well sites
  • 6012ha cut blocks

We are now constructing automated software for
the calculation and tracking of landscape change
through orthophotos and landsat imagery
32
Resource Selection Function Models
33
Individual Level/Watershed Level Models
RSF
Low
Mid
High
Validation Point
34
P a r t I .
Nielsen, UofA
Population-level Models
Model Performance
Model Training dev. ROC
35
Pre-Berry RSF Model for Study Area
Habitat Selection
Status and trends
36
How are these maps being used?
  • Provided to local LFS land use staff.
  • Conoco has used these for pipeline alignment
    planning.
  • Petro-Canada has used these for road placement
    and pipeline planning.
  • Weldwood has used these for road planning
  • CRC is using these maps for coal mining pit
    planning

37
Roads and Bears
Status and trends
38
Bears spending more time near open roads have a
higher risk of mortality
Mortality
Status and trends
39
Roads and Bears
  • Other important findings
  • Female bears spend more time closer to roads
  • Bears utilize riparian zones for movement
    corridors and for feeding and resting sites
  • The human dimension of bears and people along
    roadways can result in management actions leading
    to the removal of a bear

Status and trends
40
Roads and Bears
Preliminary analysis by MCP and 95 kernel home
range has found a strong correlation between
population level survival rates and open road
densities.
Survival Rate Road Density Low High Moderate
Moderate High Low
Status and trends
Bears exist in these areas but they dont survive
as long
41
Roads and Bears - Conclusions
  • Increasing unrestricted human access in grizzly
    bear habitat will likely increase bear mortality
  • Increasing human access will also reduce
    available habitats for some bears
  • Selecting the best locations for necessary roads
    and access control measures in identified grizzly
    bear habitat are important

Status and trends
42
Status and Trends
  • Provide data and develop methodologies to allow
    the assessment and monitoring of grizzly bear
    population parameters over time

43
Scat Sniffing Dogs Inventory techniques
  • This will represent an important new tool to use
    for grizzly bear inventory work.
  • We continue to use annual DNA data to review our
    population estimates

44
Grizzly Bear Health
  • It would be useful to have other measures of
    population health apart from simply looking at
    numbers

45
  • Consider other measures of population health and
    ways to measure this
  • Reproductive function
  • Age of sexual maturity
  • BCI
  • Are there relationships between health and
    landscape conditions?

46
Common Tools Being Developed
  • Remote Sensing Tools to provide habitat maps for
    landscape level identification of grizzly bear
    habitat in Alberta
  • GIS tools to measure and quantify landscape
    change in grizzly bear habitat
  • DNA tools and procedures to census all bear
    populations
  • RSF methods to predict grizzly bear occurrence
    based on habitat and human use features to
    improve existing CEA grizzly bear models
  • Graph theory models to identify and predict
    grizzly bear movement corridors
  • New techniques to measure and monitor grizzly
    bear population health

47
RESULTS
  • Science based data for use in developing land use
    policies and practices
  • Data to support approaches to sustainable
    resource development.
  • Testing existing models and improving them is an
    important part of adaptive management practices

48
Current Program Sponsors
  • Ainsworth Lumber
  • Alberta Conservation Assoc.
  • Alberta Newsprint
  • Alberta Environment/SRD
  • Anderson Resources Ltd.
  • AVID Canada
  • B P Canada Energy Company
  • Blue Ridge Lumber
  • Burlington Resources Ltd.
  • Canada Center for Remote Sensing
  • Canadian Hunter
  • Canadian Wildlife Service
  • Canfor
  • Cardinal River Coals
  • Conoco Phillips Ltd.
  • Foothills Model Forest
  • FRIAA
  • GeoAnalytic Ltd.
  • Inland Cement
  • Jasper National Park
  • Luscar Ltd..
  • Millar Western Ltd.
  • Mountain Equipment Co-op
  • NSERC
  • Oil and Gas Commission
  • Petro Canada
  • Precision Drilling Ltd.
  • PTAC - ERAC
  • Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
  • Suncor
  • Sundance Forest Industries
  • Sunpine Forest Products
  • Talisman Energy Ltd.
  • Telemetry Solutions
  • Trans Canada Pipelines
  • University of Alberta
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Lethbridge
  • University of Washington
  • Veritas
  • Weldwood of Canada
  • Western College of Veterinary Medicine
  • Weyerhaeuser Ltd.
  • World Wildlife Fund
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com