WalMarts View on Demand Response Program Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

WalMarts View on Demand Response Program Design

Description:

Reliability pay should be proportional to the response time, not to size. ... 13. Baseline estimated from historical data is not an accurate measure of savings ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: anoushf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WalMarts View on Demand Response Program Design


1
Wal-Marts View on Demand Response Program Design
  • Anoush Farhangi
  • Angela Beehler

2
Metering Concerns
  • A cornerstone of deregulation is advanced
    metering. Without measuring consumption in finer
    intervals it is not possible to verify
    participation in demand response programs.
  • The cost of advanced metering should be lowered
    by removing unreasonable regulation, and
    promoting competition and innovations.
  • Customers should be allowed to install their own
    advanced meters given that they are in compliance
    with the standards set by the regulatory
    authority.
  • Customers should receive full credit for meter
    ownership.
  • Customers or their authorized representative
    should have full, frequent and easy access to
    their own meter data.
  • The data should be made available to customers in
    a standard format set by the regulatory
    authority.
  • The customer should not bear any cost for access
    to their own meter data.

3
Identify Target Market
  • The highest priority of the Commission should be
    the development of rules, regulations and
    incentive plans that would encourage Demand
    Response among all customers.
  • Rules should not be developed for the benefit of
    a handful of market participants.
  • Large industrial customers that are the sole
    beneficiaries of the current regulations could
    engage in one on one contracts with Ercot.

4
Terms and Conditions
  • Customers or their authorized representative
    should be able to directly participate in demand
    response programs without having to go through a
    third party aggregator and without having to pay
    any participation fees.
  • Paperwork, and program terms should be kept
    simple and standard across TDSPs and systems.
  • A customer should be able to aggregate its entire
    load from multiple sites in one system or zone.
  • Minimum per site requirement is discriminatory
    and prevents the full participation of commercial
    customers.

5
Market Reforms
  • Market data should be available to all customers
    in a timely basis.
  • Market should be transparent. After the fact
    changes to market data should be kept to a
    minimum.
  • Price signals should be accurate and allocated to
    specific intervals in which the cost occurs.
  • Balancing accounts, uplift charges, etc. that
    apply to load ratio shares not to hourly prices
    distort market signals and should be minimized.
  • Customers must be made aware of severe market
    conditions well ahead of time to prepare for full
    load participation.

6
Incentives Reform
  • There should be a parity between demand and
    supply alternatives.
  • Reliability pay should be proportional to the
    response time, not to size.
  • A customer able to reduce one KW in 10 minutes
    should get paid more than a customer able to
    reduce 1 KW in 30 minutes.
  • A customer able to reduce load by 10,000 KW in 10
    minutes should get the SAME rate per KW as the
    customer that can reduce 1 KW in 10 minutes.
  • Demand Resources can be used to reduce load,
    shift load, provide reliability support or to
    lower system ramp rate.
  • Demand resource deployments can result in
    shifting load from high heat rate periods to low
    heat rate periods, or in conservation.
  • In addition to providing reliability benefits,
    demand resources provide environmental attributes
    as well.
  • The Commission should consider providing to the
    customers environmental incentives for deployment
    of demand resources such as RECS or White Tags.

7
Base Line Development
  • Calculation of baseline energy should be based on
    the conditions at the time of interruptions and
    not based on historical data.

8
Experiments
9
Connecticut Experiment 8/1/2006 and 8/2/2006
The Experiment resulted in around 3 MW of load
reduction in 35 facilities in CT in two critical
periods in the Northeast.
10
Light Dimming Experiment in Alice Texas
Lights were dimmed to take advantage of natural
daylight Spikes in lighting load as cloud cover
reduced natural daylight Direct effect
Significant reduction in lighting load around
70KW Indirect effect Reduction in Air
Conditioning load around 40 KW Currently, over
100 stores in Ercot are equipped with the dimming
technology.
11
Pre Cooling Experiment, Tyler Texas
  • The store was pre cooled in the early morning
    hours.
  • Set point was returned to normal at 7 am.
  • 250 kwh increase in AC, 120 KWH reduction in
    Refrigeration, a net of 130 KWH gain.
  • Can be used to lower system ramp rate.

12
Texas 4/17 and 4/18 load
Significant reduction on 4/18 after AC set point
was raised by 3 degrees
13
Baseline estimated from historical data is not an
accurate measure of savings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com