Title: Anomalous Dynamics of Translocation
1Anomalous Dynamics of Translocation
Mehran Kardar MIT
COLLABORATORS Yacov Kantor, Tel Aviv Jeffrey
Chuang, UCSF
Supported by
2OUTLINE
- Polymer dynamics biological examples and
technological applications - Translocation as an escape problem
- Anomalous dynamics of free translocating
polymers - Translocation under influence of force
- Conclusions
3Dynamics of polymers in confined geometries
- Accumulation of exogenous DNA in host cell
nucleus - viral infection
- gene therapy
- direct DNA vaccinations
- Motion of DNA through a pore can be used to
read-off the sequence - Motion of polymer in random environments
- DNA gel electrophoresis or reptation
4A reconstituted nucleus being dragged after a
3-µm-diameter bead, linked by a molecule of DNA.
The time interval between measurements in the
first and second images is 532Â sec, between
the second and third, 302Â sec. Note the
shortening of the maximum distance between bead
and nucleus.
Salman, H. et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 98, 7247-7252
5What is a pore in a membrane?
Alpha-hemolysin secreted by the human pathogen
Staphylococcus aureus is a 33.2kD protein
(monomer) It forms 232.4kD heptameric pore
Song, Hobaugh, Shustak, Cheley, Bayley, Gouaux
Science 274, 1859 (1996)
6Measuring translocation of a polymer
Meller, Nivon, Branton PRL 86, 3435 (2001)
7Measuring translocation of a polymer (contd)
Bates, Burns, Meller Biophys.J., 84,2366 (2003)
Method of measuring translocation times in the
absence of driving force
8Translocation through a solid membrane
9Computer simulations of complicated problems
10Translocation the simplest problem
Find mean translocation time its distribution
as a function of N, forces, properties of the pore
11Entropy of translocating polymer
Reviews Eisenriegler, Kremer, Binder JCP 77,
6296 (1982) De Bell, Lookman RPM 65, 87 (1993)
12Diffusion over a barrier Kramers problem
s
H.A. Kramers, Physica 7, 284 (1940)
13Is there a well in the entropic problem?
Free energy for N1000 as a function of
translocation coordinate s
Chuang, Kantor, Kardar, PRE 65, 011892 (2001)
Sung, Park, PRL 77, 783 (1996) Muthukumar, JCP
111, 10371 (1999)
14Is there a well in the entropic problem?
(contnd)
Distribution of escape times with (dashed) and
without (solid) barrier
Chuang, Kantor, Kardar, PRE 65, 011892 (2001)
15Smoluchowski equation vs. simulationthe case of
3D phantom chain
Distribution of translocation coordinate n for 3
different times (N100) continuous lines
represent fitted solutions of Smoluchowski
equation (D0.011) S.-S. Chern, A.E. Cardenas,
R.D. Coalson JCP 115, 7772 (2001)
16Translocation vs. free diffusion
Translocation is faster than free diffusion!???
17Monte Carlo model
181D phantom polymer model
max2, w1
19Translocation time of 1D phantom polymer
Translocation time of 1D phantom polymers
averaged over 10,000 cases
Chuang, Kantor, Kardar, PRE 65, 011892 (2001)
20Translocation time of 2D polymer
Ratio between translocation times of 2D phantom
and self-avoiding polymers with and without
membrane
Effective exponents for 2D phantom and
self-avoiding polymers with and without
mebrane Note in d2, 12n2.5
Translocation time of 2D phantom self-avoiding
polymers (averaged over 10,000 cases)
Chuang, Kantor, Kardar, PRE 65, 011892 (2001)
21Anomalous diffusion of a momomer
Kremer, Binder, JCP 81, 6381 (84) Grest,
Kremer, PR A33, 3628 (86) Carmesin, Kremer,
Macromol. 21, 2819 (88)
22Anomalous translocation of a polymer
Time dependence of fluctuations in translocation
coordinate in 2D self-avoiding polymer. The slope
approaches 0.80.
Y. Kantor and M. Kardar, Phys. Rev. E 69, 021806
(2002)
23Translocation with a force applied at the end
Distribution of translocation times for N128and
values of Fa//kT0, 0.25 and infinity, for 2D
self-avoiding polymer. 250 configurations.
Scaled inverse translocation time in 2D
self-avoiding polymer as a function of scaled
force.
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
24Infinite force applied at the end
Translocation of 2d self-avoiding polymer under
influence of infinite force at t0, 60,000,
120,000 MC time units
Scaled inverse translocation time in 2D
self-avoiding polymer as a function of N under
influence of an infinite force. Slope of the line
is 1.875.
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
25Infinite force applied to phantom polymer
Snapshots of spatial configuration
of translocating 1D phantom polymer (N128) under
influence of infinite force at several stages of
the process
Translocation time of 1D phantom polymer as a
function of N under influence of an infinite
force (circles) and motion without membrane
(squares). Slopes of the lines converge to 2.00
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
26Infinite force applied to free phantom polymer
Snapshots of spatial configuration of 1D
phantom polymer (N128) moving under influence of
infinite force. The position of first monomer was
displaced to x0.
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
27Short time scaling
Position of the first monomer of 1D phantom
polymer as a function of scaled time during the
translocation process for N8,16,32,,512.
Position of the first monomer of 1D phantom
polymer as a function of scaled time in the
absence of membrane for N8,16,32,,512.
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
28Infinite CPD phantom polymer
Translocation time in 2D phantom polymer as a
function of N under influence of an infinite
chemical potential difference. Slope of the line
is 1.45.
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
29Translocation with chemical potential difference
Distribution of translocation times for N64and
values of U/kT0, 0.25, 0.75 and 2, for 2D
self-avoiding polymer. 250 configurations.
Scaled inverse translocation time in 2D
self-avoiding polymer as a function of scaled U .
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
30Infinite chemical potential difference
Translocation of 2D self-avoiding polymer under
influence of infinite chemical potential
difference at t 10,000, 25,000 MC time units.
Kantor, Kardar (2002)
31Conclusions/Perspectives
- Normal diffusion explains only Gaussian
polymers and gives wrong prefactors - Anomalous dynamics provides a consistent picture
of translocation - There is no detailed theory that will enable
calculation of coefficients - Crossovers persist even for N1000.
- We presented bounds for diffusion under
influence of large forces. Are they the real
answer?