Title: Performancebased standard setting methods
1Performance-based standard setting methods
- Katharine Boursicot
- Trudie Roberts
2Performance-based standard setting methods
- Borderline group method
- Contrasting group method
- Regression based standard method
Kramer A, Muijtjens A, Jansen K, Düsman H, Tan L,
van der Vleuten C Comparison of a rational
and an empirical standard setting procedure for
an OSCE, Medical Education, 2003 Vol 37 Issue 2,
Page 132 Kaufman DM, Mann KV, Muijtjens AMM, van
der Vleuten CPM. A comparison of standard-setting
procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical
education. Acad Med 2000 75267-271.
3(No Transcript)
4The examiners role in standard setting
- Uses the examiners clinical expertise to judge
the candidates performance - Examiner allocates a global judgement based on
the candidates performance at that station - Remember the level of the examination
-
-
Pass
Borderline
Fail
5Borderline Group Method
Test score distribution
Checklist
1. Hs shjs sjnhss sjhs sjs sj 2. Ksks
sksmsiqopql qlqmq q q qkl 3. Lalka kdm ddkk
dlkl dlld 4. Keyw dd e r rrmt tmk 5. Jfjfk
dd 6. Hskls skj sls ska ak akl ald 7.
Hdhhddh shs ahhakk as TOTAL
?
?
?
?
Borderline score distribution
?
Pass, Fail, Borderline
Passing score
6Contrasting groups method
Test score distribution
Checklist
1. Hs shjs sjnhss sjhs sjs sj 2. Ksks
sksmsiqopql qlqmq q q qkl 3. Lalka kdm ddkk
dlkl dlld 4. Keyw dd e r rrmt tmk 5. Jfjfk
dd 6. Hskls skj sls ska ak akl ald 7.
Hdhhddh shs ahhakk as TOTAL
?
?
?
Pass
Fail
?
?
Pass, Fail, Borderline P/B/F
Passing score
7Regression based standard
Checklist
X passing score
1. Hs shjs sjnhss sjhs sjs sj 2. Ksks
sksmsiqopql qlqmq q q qkl 3. Lalka kdm ddkk
dlkl dlld 4. Keyw dd e r rrmt tmk 5. Jfjfk
dd 6. Hskls skj sls ska ak akl ald 7.
Hdhhddh shs ahhakk as TOTAL
?
Checklist Score
?
X
?
?
?
Overall rating 1 2 3 4 5
Clear Borderline Clear Excellent
Outstanding fail pass
1 Clear fail 2 Borderline 3 Clear pass 4
Excellent 5 Outstanding
8Performance-based standard setting
- Advantages
- Utilises the expertise of the examiners
- they are observing the performance of the
students - they are in a position to make a (global)
judgement about the performance - based on
- their clinical expertise
- expected standards for the level of the test
- knowledge of the curriculum/teaching
9Borderline/ contrasting/ regression-based methods
- Advantages
- Large number of examiners set a collective
standard while observing the candidates not
just an academic exercise - Reliable cut-off score based on large sample of
judgments - Credible and defensible based on expert judgment
in direct observation
10Performance-based standard setting
- Disadvantages
- Requires large cohort of candidates to achieve
enough numbers in the borderline group - Passing score not known in advance
- Judgments not independent of checklist scoring
- Requires expert processing of marks immediately
after the exam - Checking of results
- Delay in producing results