Fostering Institutional Readiness to Achieve Excellence in Teaching and Learning

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Fostering Institutional Readiness to Achieve Excellence in Teaching and Learning

Description:

1998 STRUCTURED ASSIGNMENTS FOR. SMALL GROUPS. 1996 2000 (cont. ... Workshops. Shaping Faculty Culture: Establish EXPECTATIONS ... –

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fostering Institutional Readiness to Achieve Excellence in Teaching and Learning


1
Fostering Institutional Readiness to Achieve
Excellence in Teaching and Learning
  • A Plenary Session by
  • Sue Borrego
  • Dee Fink
  • Damon Williams
  • Moderated by Alma Clayton-Pedersen

AACU Greater Expectations Institute 2008
Snowbird, Utah
2
TWO PREMISES The QUALITY of your educational
program the QUALITY OF STUDENT LEARNING in
and from the program GOAL of any organization ?
To be GOOD. To be BETTER 3-5-10 years from now,
than you are today.
3
Educational Program THREE KEY FACTORS
Educational
Educational
Educational
Program
Program
Program
High Quality STUDENT LEARNING
Faculty
Students
Faculty
Students
Faculty
Faculty
Students
Students
4
GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR DISCUSSION
5
  • Key Role of FACULTY
  • Make curricular decisions
  • Teach courses
  • Problem
  • Limited preparation for either role
  • Solution?
  • Enhance their abilities
  • Increase time spent learning about teaching,
    curriculum, etc.

6
Getting Better Over Time
7
1991 - 1995
1991 ACTIVE LEARNING 1991
COOPERATIVE LEARNING
1992 LEARNING STYLES
1993 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES
1995 CRITICALLY REFLECTING ON YOUR OWN
TEACHING 1995 EVALUATING YOUR OWN
TEACHING 1995 EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
8
1996 - 2000
1996 TEACHING STUDENTS HOW TO ENGAGE IDEAS
1997 TEACHING PORTFOLIO 1997 DEEP LEARNING
1998 EFFECTIVE GRADING RUBRICS 1998 IN-DEPTH
UNDERSTANDING OF ONESELF AS A
PERSON/TEACHER
9
1996 2000 (cont.)
1998 SERVICE LEARNING 1998 STRUCTURED
ASSIGNMENTS FOR SMALL GROUPS
1999 PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING 1999 LEARNING
COMMUNITIES
10
2001 2004
2001 - PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
2002 HOW THE BRAIN WORKS 2002
LEARNER-CENTERED TEACHING
2003 A TAXONOMY OF SIGNIFICANT
LEARNING 2003 INTEGRATED COURSE DESIGN
11
2001 2004 (cont.)
2004 THEORIES OF LEARNING AND
MOTIVATION 2004 TEAM-BASED LEARNING 2004
LEARNING PORTFOLIOS 2004 INQUIRY-GUIDED
LEARNING 2004 FORMATIVE FEEDBACK 2004 WHAT
THE BEST COLLEGE TEACHERS DO
12
2005 - 2006
2005 TEACHING INCLUSIVELY 2005 LEADING
DISCUSSIONS 2005 FINDING JOY IN TEACHING 2006
CONSTRUCTING COLLEGE COURSES 2006 SKILLFUL
TEACHING
13
  • Key Role of FACULTY
  • Make curricular decisions
  • Teach courses
  • Problem
  • Limited preparation for either role
  • Solution?
  • Enhance their abilities
  • Increase time spent learning about teaching,
    curriculum, etc.
  • What can you do?
  • Re-shape FACULTY CULTURE
  • embrace learning about teaching

14
Re-Shaping FACULTY Culture
15
Re-Shaping Faculty Culture
  • Establish EXPECTATIONS
  • Hire faculty who want to learn get better
  • Beginning of year Plan faculty work
  • Provide SUPPORT
  • Open up TIME
  • Provide faculty development program
  • ASSESS REWARD Desired Kinds of Faculty Work
  • Add Professional Enhancement to Faculty
    Assessment Criteria
  • Assess teaching more holistically

16
Re-Shaping Faculty Culture
  • Establish EXPECTATIONS
  • Hire faculty who want to learn get better
  • Beginning of year Plan faculty work
  • Provide SUPPORT
  • Open up TIME
  • Provide faculty development program
  • ASSESS REWARD Desired Kinds of Faculty Work
  • Add Professional Enhancement to Faculty
    Assessment Criteria
  • Assess teaching more holistically

17
PRIMARY DIMENSIONS OF FACULTY WORK
Quality of Work
  • of Time
  • Teaching _____
  • Research ______
  • 3. Service _____
  • TOTAL 100
  • 4. Professional Enhancement _____
  • Teaching
  • Research
  • Service
  • Professional Self-Management

18
Shaping Faculty Culture
  • Establish EXPECTATIONS
  • Hire faculty who want to learn get better
  • Beginning of year Plan faculty work
  • Provide SUPPORT
  • Open up TIME
  • Provide strong faculty development program
  • ASSESS REWARD Desired Kinds of Faculty Work
  • Add Professional Enhancement to Faculty
    Assessment Criteria
  • Assess teaching more holistically

19
  • Faculty Development WHAT IS IT?
  • Process
  • Activities that help faculty to learn new and
    better ideas on teaching learning, so that
  • Intermediate Goal
  • Faculty increase their teaching capabilities, so
    that
  • Ultimate Goal
  • STUDENTS more frequently have powerful,
    significant learning experiences, and
  • The INSTITUTION more effectively fulfills its
    educational mission, and
  • The educational needs of SOCIETY are met!

20
  • Faculty Development WHAT IS IT?
  • The center provides multiple kinds of services
    for the university
  • For FACULTY Typical activities include
  • For UNIVERSITY (Organizational Development)
  • Offers ideas on how POLICIES and PROCEDURES may
    need to change, to support better teaching and
    learning.

21
Shaping Faculty Culture
  • Establish EXPECTATIONS
  • Hire faculty who want to learn get better
  • Beginning of year Plan faculty work
  • Provide SUPPORT
  • Open up TIME
  • Provide strong faculty development program
  • ASSESS REWARD Desired Kinds of Faculty Work
  • Add Professional Enhancement to Faculty
    Assessment Criteria
  • Assess teaching more holistically

22
Re-Shaping Faculty Culture
  • Establish EXPECTATIONS
  • Hire faculty who want to learn get better
  • Beginning of year Plan faculty work
  • Provide SUPPORT
  • Open up TIME
  • Provide strong faculty development program
  • ASSESS REWARD Desired Kinds of Faculty Work
  • Add Professional Enhancement to Faculty
    Assessment Criteria
  • Assess teaching more holistically

23
CRITERIA SOURCES OF INFORMATION
24
Shaping Faculty Culture
  • Establish EXPECTATIONS
  • Hire faculty who want to learn get better
  • Beginning of year Plan faculty work
  • Provide SUPPORT
  • Open up TIME
  • Provide strong faculty development program
  • ASSESS REWARD Desired Kinds of Faculty Work
  • Add Professional Enhancement to Faculty
    Assessment Criteria
  • Assess teaching more holistically

25
GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR DISCUSSION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com