Reference No'1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Reference No'1

Description:

process. Reference No./8. Pig weight, size and shape. Reference No./9 ... Sow - side view. Distortion removed and scale added. Reference No./22 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: cmw1
Category:
Tags: reference | sow

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reference No'1


1
(No Transcript)
2
Integrated Management Systems for Livestock
ProductionC. P. SchofieldSilsoe Research
Institute
  • Funded through the DEFRA LINK
  • Sustainable Livestock Production Programme SLP
    065/LK0614
  • We acknowledge sponsorship from DEFRA and MLC,
    and Industrial partners BOCM Pauls Limited, PIC
    (UK) Limited and Osborne (Europe) Limited

3
inputs pigs food water heat ventilation li
ghting bedding medication labour
outputs pork (quantity and quality) solid and
liquid waste gaseous emissions dust odour welf
are
4
inputs pigs food water heat ventilation li
ghting bedding medication labour
outputs pork (quantity and quality) solid and
liquid waste gaseous emissions dust odour welf
are
5
Integrated Management Systems -Basic Concepts
6
(No Transcript)
7
Model-based closed loop control system
8
Pig weight, size and shape
9
  • Pigs using a prototype feeder with camera above.

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Original image
Dividing into parts (shape)
Monitoring growth, here from 25kg to 125kg
13
(No Transcript)
14
Weight vs area(Marchant et al 1999)
15
Weight by VIA and Fire
Weight (FIRE) Weight (VIA)
16
VIA estimated weight versus platform weight for
pig 2198
17
  • Two herds of large white pigs were grown from
    26kg to in excess of 100kg.
  • Herd 1 was fed a diet with 0.81 g/MJ of lysine
  • Aim to choose diet of herd 2 so that the pigs
    grew as shown

18
100
80
Weight
60
(kg)
Group 1
40
Group 2
20
0
20
40
60
80
Days since trial began
Group 1
Group 2
  • Feed cost/pig
  • FCR - days 0-20FCR - days 21-68FCR - full trial
  • The bone structure of the pigs in group 2 was
    bigger on average than those in group 1

22.28 1.962.582.43
21.03 1.712.402.12
(19.4)
19
SOWS
20
Sow - top view.Distortion removed and scale added
21
Sow - side view.Distortion removed and scale
added
22
Pig 661 week before farrowing
23
Pig 661 week after farrowing
24
Pig 661 body widthTail Head
600
500
400
14-Mar
9-May
300
16-May
200
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
25
Pig 661 body depthTail Head
26
Integrated Management System for Finishing Pigs
27
Model-based closed loop control system
28
Sensors
  • growth, yield
  • composition
  • feed intake (quantity, quality)
  • fertility
  • health
  • environment

29
Feed intake
30
Animal Nutrient Flow
31
IMS - Future Developments
  • Production
  • Environmental processes
  • Health
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com