Evaluation and Triage of Lumbar Spine Patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation and Triage of Lumbar Spine Patients

Description:

Straight leg raise - most sensitive for sciatic pain syndromes ... ROM to rule out other causes of back/leg pain: internal and external hip rotation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:481
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: alanmsca
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation and Triage of Lumbar Spine Patients


1
Evaluation and Triage of Lumbar Spine Patients
  • Alan M. Scarrow, M.D., J.D.
  • Section of Neurosurgery
  • St. Johns Hospital

2
Lumbar Spine Disease
  • 75-80 of all people have back pain at some time
    in their life
  • Annual prevalence of back pain 15-45
  • 5th most common cause of admission to the
    hospital
  • 3rd most common surgical procedure

3
Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Low back pain is second to upper respiratory
    problems as a reason for visits to a physician
  • In the U.S., back pain is the most common cause
    of activity limitation in people younger than 45
    years
  • Cost of low back pain to industry estimated
    35-75 billion

4
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Where to start?
  • What do we know?
  • What to do?
  • Who to consult?
  • What will they do?

5
What we know v. what we think we know
  • answering very
  • Topic ?s correctly confident
  • SI joint pain 4.4 32.2
  • Lumbar stenosis 12.6 28.6
  • Leg length differences 42.0 27.0
  • Fibromyalgia 57.1 35.5
  • Myofascial pain (piri) 68.7 8.5
  • J Am Geriatr Soc 541772-1777 2006

6
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • From the top
  • Patient History
  • Location of pain
  • Duration of pain
  • Character/quality of pain
  • Weakness
  • Numbness

7
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Psychological factors anxiety, depression,
    somatization symptoms, stressful
    responsibilities, job dissatisfaction, mental
    stress at work, negative body image, weakness in
    ego functioning (prospective predictors of
    developing back pain)
  • Activities that affect pain (e.g. leaning forward
    in spinal stenosis, sitting down, coughing,
    sneezing, Valsalva for herniated discs)
  • Bowel, bladder or sexual dysfunction
  • Prior or current treatments including medication
  • Smoking (smokers complain of more severe symptoms
    and have less improvement postsurgically)
  • Obesity (obese patients more likely to suffer
    radicular pain or neurologic symptoms and carry
    more comorbidities)
  • Diabetes (may need neurophysiology testing)

8
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Physical Exam
  • Strength
  • Sensation
  • Reflexes
  • Range of Motion
  • Palpation

9
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Strength exam
  • L3 - iliopsoas muscle (hip flexion), adductor
    longus (hip adduction)
  • L4 - quadriceps femoris (knee extension),
    tibialis anterior (dorsiflexion and inversion)
  • L5 - gluteus medius/minimus (thigh abduction and
    medial rotation), extensor hallicus longus (big
    toe extension), peroneus longus and brevis
    (plantar flexion and eversion)
  • S1 - gluteus maximus (thigh abduction), biceps
    femoris (hip extension), gastrocnemius (plantar
    flexion)

10
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine DiseaseLower
extremity sensation
11
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Reflexes
  • L3 - iliopsoas reflex (meaningful?)
  • L4 - knee jerk
  • L5 - extensor hallicus reflex (meaningful?)
  • S1 - ankle jerk
  • Babinski - in adults, UMN lesion from motor strip
    to lower spinal cord

12
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Range of Motion
  • Straight leg raise - most sensitive for sciatic
    pain syndromes
  • Pain in contralateral leg with straight leg raise
    is most specific for sciatic pain syndromes
  • Lumbar flexion/extension (lumbar stenosis worse
    with extension, better with flexion)

13
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • ROM to rule out other causes of back/leg pain
    internal and external hip rotation
  • Palpation over spine, SI joint, pelvis and hip

14
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Clinical impression
  • lumbar disc herniation pain, paresthesias,
    weakness, depressed DTRs in an anatomic
    distribution (i.e. down lower extremity)
  • lumbar stenosis diagnosis made mainly by
    history low back/leg pain with walking or
    standing improved by sitting or lying down (not
    just standing still) no severe cramping in calf
    no trophic changes in skin a.k.a. neurogenic
    claudication

15
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Clinical impression
  • lumbar instability pain with motion improved
    with lying down gt5 mm motion on
    flexion/extension x-rays indicates unstable
    motion segment look for defects in neural arch
    (lamina, pedicle, pars interarticularis) 30 of
    patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    (subluxation) will have progressive slippage
  • compression fracture acute to subacute onset of
    pain, pain to palpation /- history of
    trauma/cancer
  • musculoskeletal pain with active but not passive
    motion point tenderness over joint /- history
    of trauma

16
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • If clinical suspicion high for soft tissue
    (i.e. muscle, tendon, joint, ligament) source of
    symptoms then NSAIDS, narcotics, antidepressant,
    cox-2 inhibitor, PT (exercise), /- muscle
    relaxants, /- chiropractor referral, /-
    acupuncture, /- behavioral therapy, ?corsets,
    ?massage, ?traction, ?TENS, ?epidural/facet
    injections, BUTcontinue ordinary activities in
    the acute period AND in the post-acute period
    begin conditioning activities to strengthen back,
    legs, abdomen to prevent recurrence
  • /- some evidence ? unknown
  • NEJM 332351-5, 1995
  • JAMA 2721286-91, 1994

17
Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • Options when clinical suspicion low or diagnosis
    unclear
  • 1. Observe (80-90 will resolve in lt6 weeks)
  • most common diagnosis of acute (i.e. lt6 weeks)
    back pain lumbar strain
  • pathobiology may be any pain sensitive structure
    muscle, tendon, ligaments, disc, facet joints,
    periosteum, meninges, blood vessels, or
    degenerative changes
  • no controlled studies to correlate symptoms
    and imaging
  • NSAIDS, narcotics, antidepressant, cox-2
    inhibitor, PT while you are observing
  • 2. Imaging
  • BUT ASK THE PATIENT are you willing to have
    surgery or other invasive procedure if we do this
    work up?
  • For back pain pts 4 will have compression fx,
    1 will have a tumor, 3 will have a herniated
    disc

18
Imaging of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • If clinical suspicion high for intraspinal source
    of symptoms i.e. radiculopathy, neurogenic
    claudication, lumbar instability, compression fx
    then
  • 1) MRI, MRI, MRI unless there is a
    contraindication (see next slide)
  • Add contrast only if patient has had prior
    surgery or a history of cancer perhaps with a
    demyelinating process like multiple sclerosis
  • If not sure order without contrast and radiology
    will pick up the ones that do need it

19
Imaging of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • 2) If there is a contraindication to MRI then CT
    myelogram (contraindications to MRI heart stent
    lt 2 weeks old, defibrillator, pacemaker, pain
    pump, spinal cord or deep brain stimulator, prior
    lumbar spine instrumentation, programmable shunt)
  • Questions? call radiology or specialist involved
    in placing device or hardware
  • If patient is too large for closed MRI then order
    open MRI
  • CT is WAY OVERUTILIZED as a spine diagnostic test
    and delivers A LOT of radiation to the patient

20
Imaging of Lumbar Spine Disease
  • 3) if signs of spondylolisthesis then
    flexion/extension x-rays (lateral)
  • 4) pain medications (NSAIDS, narcotics, /- oral
    steroid taper, /- muscle relaxant)
  • 5) Consultation after MRI or CT myelogram results
    show something other than degenerative changes

21
Consultation at the Spine Center
  • Who should I send what to?
  • General recommendations
  • Acute pain problems surgeons pain management
  • Surgeons usually after imaging
  • Active smokers will be strongly encouraged to
    stop
  • Poorly controlled diabetics (Hgb A1C gt 7) will
    result in re-evaluation request with primary care
    prior to surgery
  • Pain management does not require imaging
  • Chronic pain problems physiatry neurology
  • Does not require imaging

22
SPORT Study
  • Conservative therapy isnt the worst idea for
    patients with a herniated disc and mild to
    moderate symptoms
  • 2-year prospective randomized trial of patients
    with radicular symptoms gt 6 weeks and imaging
    evidence of a herniated disc
  • Randomized to surgery or PT, exercise, NSAIDS
  • LOTS of patients cross-over to opposite group if
    symptoms are too mild or too severe
  • BUT at 2-year follow-up, both surgery and
    conservative management was effective
  • JAMA 20062962451-2459

23
Should I reimage?
  • Have symptoms or signs changed significantly?
  • Has there been a recent intervention (e.g.
    surgery) or trauma?
  • Look at patients chart has it been gt1 year
    since last imaging?
  • If the answer to these 3 questions is no then
    reimaging is not indicated

24
Summary
  • Start with good history and physical
  • Is this emergent, urgent or routine?
  • Is the cause most likely disc, stenosis,
    instability, compression fracture or soft tissue?
  • Typically start conservative and escalate as
    necessary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com