Improved conservation and use of diversity through spatial analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

Improved conservation and use of diversity through spatial analysis

Description:

Examples from Sudan and Burkina Faso. By Isaiah Mukema, El Tahir Mohammed and. Mahamadou Sawadogo ... BURKINA FASO COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PROJECT. CONTEXT ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: Isa69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improved conservation and use of diversity through spatial analysis


1
Improved conservation and use of diversity
through spatial analysis Examples from Sudan
and Burkina Faso By Isaiah Mukema, El Tahir
Mohammed and Mahamadou Sawadogo
2
  • GIS is an acronym that stands for
    GeographicInformation Systems.
  • Geographic - means that the locations of
    aphenomenon are known, or can be calculated in
    terms geographic coordinates (longitude,
    latitude), proximity measures, distance etc
  • Information - implies that data in a GIS data are
    organized to yield useful information - maps
    andimages, statistical/model graphics, tables,
    and various on-screen responses to interactive
    queries.
  • System - implies that GIS is made up of
    severalinterrelated and linked components with
    differentbut complementary functions

3
Accept data
Process data
Display data
Analyze andinterpret data
Intermediateprocessed results
Information for decision makers
  • the data must have a locational component
  • ability to integrate, manipulate and analyze
    data from diverse sources, as individual and or
    multiple layers
  • takes advantage of methodological advancements
    made from continuing research in quantitative
    techniques in geosciences
  • has elegant display tools

4
THE USE AND VALUE OF GIS IN PGR
  • The value of any information system arises out of
    the usefulness of its resultant information
    products

Information is an answer to (a) question(s)
These questions arise in the context of
problem-solving (discharge of managerialfunction
s)
5
What are these managerial functions/questions?
  • PGR object system
  • Conservation and use
  • Exploration and collection
  • Ecogeographic surveys
  • In situ on-farm conservation
  • Research
  • Technology adaptation
  • PGR IU system
  • Information requirements
  • Data and information flows
  • Technology adaptation
  • Information system
  • Data input
  • Data storage
  • Processing and analysis
  • Supply of information
  • Adaptation of information system to its
    information utilization system

Each of these managerial functions have an
element of uncertainty and cost
6
STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY
  • ABANDON A PARTICULAR COURSE OF ACTION ALTOGETHER
  • CONTINUE TO DO BUSINESS UNDER THE PRESENT LEVELS
    OF UNCERTAINTY
  • IMPROVE THE INFORMATION BASE IN ORDER TO REDUCE
    UNCERTAINTY

WISDOM
KNOWLEDGE
INFORMATION
DATA
7
OBJECTIVES
  • Define and examine geographic biases likely to be
    found in in genebank collections.
  • General lack of randomness in collection missions
  • Species bias and species-area bias
  • Hot spots bias
  • Infrastructure bias
  • Assess the spatial distribution of plant genetic
    resources in the Sudan
  • Identify collection gaps in the Sudan genebank
    holdings
  • Determine areas of high diversity
  • Map the distribution of crop diversity and
    knowledge in Burkina

8
Systems used
  • ArcView
  • FloraMap
  • DIVA-GIS
  • S-PLUS, R
  • PASCAL, C

9
Comparison of actual vs. simulated nearest
distances for Okra in Northern Region
Simulated
Simulated
10
Number of accessions per species vs. Number of
missions
Summary of Sudan distributions
R0.6706
Local
Wide
Common
OkraHot pepper
Melon, Pearlmillet, Sesame
Rare
Number of variety selection criteria vs.
Diversity in a farm
Number of seed selection criteria vs. Diversity
in a farm
R0.2927
R0.6168
11
Plant Genetic Resources UnitAgricultural
Research CorporationSudan
  • A nucleus for a national crop genetic resources
  • system.
  • Seedbank 5600 accessions.
  • Crops
  • Cereals sorghum, pearl millet
  • Vegetables okra, melons, watermelon, hot
  • pepper, leafy vegetables
    etc
  • Oil crops sesame
  • Medicinal and aromatic plants roselle
  • Activities
  • Conservation, multiplication and regeneration
  • Characterization and evaluation
  • Documentation

12
Types of collections and data
13
(No Transcript)
14
GIS software used
  • FloraMap
  • - Prediction of distribution - Mapping
  • - Clustering -Mapping
  • DIVA
  • - Diversity analysis - Mapping
  • ArcView
  • - Creating buffers
  • - Determining number of accessions within
  • - Create layouts

15
Probability mapping - FloraMap
  • Cluster Analysis (pearl millet, hot
    pepper, okra and melon)
  • Prediction of Distribution
  • Mapping

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
DIVERSITY ANALYSIS - DIVA
  • Diversity analysis
  • - morphological characterization and
  • evaluation data (melon, okra,
    pearl millet).
  • Mapping diversity

25
(No Transcript)
26
Diversity within melon collections across regions
27
(No Transcript)
28
Diversity within okra collections across regions
29
(No Transcript)
30
Diversity within pearl millet collections across
regions
31
GAP ASSESSMENT - ArcView
  • Create buffers (distances from) around
  • - towns (major centres)
  • - roads
  • - rivers
  • Determine number of accessions
  • collected within these buffers
  • Hence determine level of bias and gaps
  • Make layouts

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
Collections within distances from towns, roads
and riversGaps filling
  • Pearl millet
  • - Collection near to towns (2-20 km)
  • - Collection far from towns (gt 100 km)
  • Sesame
  • - Collection near to towns (2-20 km)

36
Collections within distances from towns, roads
and riversGaps filling
  • Okra
  • - Collection far from towns (gt 50 km)
  • - Collections far from main roads (5-50 km)
  • Hot pepper
  • - Collection far from towns (5-40 km, gt 100km)
  • - Collection far from main roads (5-50 km)

37
Collections within distances from towns, roads
and riversGaps filling
  • Melons
  • - Collection far from rivers (gt 20 km).
  • wild melons
  • - Collection far from roads (gt 5 km,
  • gt 50 km) wild melons
  • - Collection far from towns (gt 10 km)
  • wild melons

38
General remarks on the use of GIS for Ex-Situ PGR
collections
  • Mapping collection sites.
  • Development of core collections representing
    different climatic zones.
  • Mapping sites with different diversity levels
    within the available collections.
  • Assist in determining sites for future
    collections
  • (new regions, gap filling, further collection)
  • Knowledge about crops.
  • Knowledge about the sites.
  • Other natural resources (soil types..)
  • Socio-economic factors.

39
STRENGTHENING THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF IN SITU
CONSERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY
BURKINA FASO COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PROJECT
INITIATOR OF PROJECT IPGRI
40
In situ conservation is concerned with the
maintenance of species populations in the
habitats in which they occur.
CONTEXT
For agricultural crops, in situ conservation
refers to the habitat where cultivated crops
developed their present day properties,
predominantly in farmers fields.
41
Some fundamental reasons for in situ conservation
  • To ensure conservation and use through active
    participation of farmers and communities.
    Conserves indigenous knowledge
  • Helps to maintain the whole system conserves
    processes of evaluation and adaptation.

42
To enhance and support a framework of knowledge
on-farmer decision-making processes that
influence in situ conservation of agricultural
biodiversity
To strengthen national institutions in the
planning and implementation of conservation
programmes for agricultural biodiversity
OBJECTIVES
To broaden the use of agricultural biodiversity
and the participation in its conservation by
including farming communities and other groups.
43
Countries involved in the global project
Burkina Faso Ethiopia Morocco
Africa
Mexico Peru
America
Vietnam Nepal
Asia
Hungary Turkey
Europe
44
AFRICAN COUNTRIES IN THE PROJECT
MOROCCO
ETHIOPIA
BURKINA FASO
45
(No Transcript)
46
BURKINA FASO IN SITU PROJECT
  • PROJECT ORGANIZATION
  • The project is run by a multidisciplinary Working
    Team.
  • This team is composed 11 sub-teams.
  • The main executing agent is INERA (under CNRST).
    Otherpartners include
  • 2 Universities in Burkina Faso
  • 1 NGO and
  • Ministry of Agriculture
  • The multidisciplinary Working Team formulated a
    working plan and plan activities. The activities
    are divided into 3 broad categories. These are

47
CRITERIA FOR SITE/ HOUSEHOLDS SELECTION
Burkina Faso
  • Low rainfall
  • high fluctuation in rainfall
  • known incidence of genetic erosion

ltgt
Regions
  • 5 or 6 crops - 3 or more varieties per crop
  • gt100 km from Ouagadougou
  • Presence of NGOs and farmer organizations
  • selected farmers should have been working with
    these groups
  • Interest and commitment of farmers
  • accessibility of the location throughout the year
  • permanent and full-time farmer
  • presence of knowledge about wild relatives
  • 3 or more ethnic groups per village
  • diversity in rainfall in the village

Villages
ltgt
Households
ltgt
48
(No Transcript)
49
CHOICE OF CROPS
Six crops were selected
Reason
These are the four most importantcrops in
Burkina Faso
Reason
This is considered as a woman cropin Burkina Faso
Okra
Reason
This is considered as the mostendangered crop in
Burkina Faso
Fabirama
50
DATA COLLECTED
Data were collected on the following items
  • Knowledge about seasons
  • Different types of soils
  • Important plant cultural practices
  • Crop varieties
  • Crop associations
  • Crop rankings
  • Objectives for the production of crops
  • Conservation practices
  • Socio-economic factors
  • knowledge on traditional species cultivated
  • Choices/Selection of conservation seed
  • Concept of variety selection PGR and Diversity
    and genetic variability
  • etc

51
DATA ANALYSIS.
These data are being spatially analyzed to
  • Mapping the distribution of farmers varieties,
    including endangered and disappeared varieties
  • Mapping the factors that affect diversity
  • Determine whether there are relationships between
    these factors and diversity in farmer varieties
  • Determine the type of interventions and actions
    to be taken and in what priority order

52
FARMERS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT SEASONS
The Signs indicating the End of a rainy
season
The Signs indicating the Beginning of a
season or time to plant
The Signs indicating that the season will be
bad
The Signs indicating that the season will be
good
53
The Signs indicating the Beginning of a season
or time to plant
PLANTS DA Leaf fall of Tamarindus indica,
Butyrospermum paradoxum (Karite) D1 Beginning
to have leaf of Lannea microcarpa (Sabga),
Sclerocarya birrea (Nobga) D2 Flowering of
Sclerocarya birrea (Nobga), Lannea microcarpa
(Sabga), Pterocarpus lucens(Kumbrsaka),Perperga
D3 Yellowing and leaf fall of Lannea acida
(Samb-nutuga) D4 Appearance of Stylochiton
hypogeae (Wule) in the river beds D5 Maturity
and fruiting of Lannea microcarpa (Sabga),
Sclerocarya birrea (Nobga), Butyrospermum
paradoxum (Taaga) D6 Ripening, drying
and souring of fruits of Lannea microcarpa
(Sabga), Sclerocarya birrea (Nobga)
BIRDS D7 Guinea fowls laying eggs D8 Some
birds (Taaba) building their nests D9 Storks
returning (migrating back) to the village D10
South-North migration of Silokoe and Kilimba
birds D11 Sparrowhawk crying continuously
(repeatedly) ANIMALS D12 Lizards shading
skin D13 Toads going to the bush from ponds D14
Toads croaking incessantly
STARS AND WEATHER D15 Appearance of the
constellation of six stars in the west D16
Change in the normal trajectory of the sun D17
Wind blowing from the East D18Temperatures are
warming up Dx First clouds appearing Dy
Continuous thundering
RITUALS D19 Predictions of
rainmakers D20 Traditional lunar calendar
54
  • Having good knowledge (different sources of
    knowledge with a reasonable level of each)
    provides farmers with good mechanisms for more
    accurate decision-making (e.g. selecting
    appropriate varieties for growing), which can
    result in better in situ management of the
    diversity, in turn resulting in better
    conservation of germplasm, and thereby ensuring
    its continued availability.

55
Mean number of signs for determining beginning of
season
Mean number of signs
Mean number of signs for determining good season
Mean number of signs
56
CONCLUSION 1 It seems that farmers in site 1
have reasonably good knowledge about the
beginning of seasons, and the good seasons. This
is indicated by their ability to use combinations
of all signs comparatively equitably. This gives
them more sources of knowledge different
options for accurate decision-making on cropping
seasons. This in turn has a very vital effect on
the maintenance of the crop germplasm diversity
by the farmers.
57
Frequency of using plants to predict a season
SITE 1
58
(No Transcript)
59
  • Conclusion 2
  • Farmers in all sites seem to have rich
    alternative sources of plant based knowledge to
    predict seasons. This is reflected in the number
    of plant species that are used in these sites for
    such purpose.
  • Therefore to build a sustainable strategy for
    conservation such plant species need to be
    conserved as well.
  • As a general conclusion about the farmers
    decision making process which is affecting crop
    diversity, the whole component of the ecosystem
    surrounding the farmer is necessary and need to
    be sustained and conserved - otherwise farmers
    will lose vital tools that help them to sustain
    and conserve their crop diversity.
  • If we know that some of these important tree
    species are at present endangered in the Northern
    Central region in Burkina Faso, it becomes very
    necessary to adopt an integrated conservation
    approach, where different disciplines come work
    together towards conserving all the components of
    the ecosystem, including crops.

60
Site 2
Site1
Site 3
61
DIVERSITY AND PRIORITIES
ACROSS THE SITES
H - high M - medium L - low
62
  • CONCLUSION 3
  • Contrary the initial thinking (at the beginning
    of this study), diversity
  • is found to be Low in Site 3, where the
    agro-climatic conditions are very
  • good, while it is High in Site 1 which is
    characterized by adverse
  • agro-climatic conditions (drought spells, poor
    soil, desertification, etc.).
  • At such risky conditions farmers seem to be using
    diversity as a strategy
  • for survival here diversity may be a means of
    life (survival).

63
UNWEIGHTED GROUNDNUT DIVERSITY
UNWEIGHTED OKRA DIVERSITY
UNWEIGHTEDCOWPEA DIVERSITY
64
GENERAL CONCLUSION
  • Farmers have reasonable good knowledge about
    their environment, that is indicated by their
    ability to use combination of all signs
    (indicators) at comparatively good levels, which
    give them different options and more sources of
    knowledge to come with more accurate decisions on
    the cropping season. This in turn has a very
    vital effect on the maintenance of the crop
    germplasm diversity by the farmers.
  • Diversity may be a means of life for farmer
    living in very arid regions of Burkina Faso
  • The ecosystem provides farmers with sources of
    knowledge that is then used to guarantee the
    sustainability of crop genetic resources.
  • Ecosystem components form the base of a pyramid
    at the top of which are crop genetic resources,
    and both are linked by the knowledge obtained
    from the ecosystem and applied on the crop
    genetic resources.
  • In situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity
    needs Integrated approach (multidisciplinary,
    participatory complementary approach).

65
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com