WP 8 Kick off

1
1
WP 8 Stakeholder Validation Team Kick off
meeting
2
Why RESCUE ?
Gaps

• Stakeholder activities lack integration
• Lacking political commitment low priority for
  brownfield reuse
• Sustainability of projects uncertain

3
Sustainable Development Meet todays needs
without jeopardising to meet the needs of future
generations. (Brundland Commission 1987)

• Sustainable Brownfield Development
• Ensure that the needs of present and future
  generations be satisfied enduringly and in a way
  that is
• environmentally sensitive
• economically viable
• institutionally robust and
• socially acceptable

4
RESCUE Development of a system approach for the
sustainable regeneration of brownfield sites
across Europe
5
Case Studies
Case Study selection

• Sites are comparable (previous land use, size,
  etc.)
• Site is relevant for all sustainability aspects
• Data are available for all aspects, especially
  for sustainability criteria (economical,
  environmental, social)
• Redevelopment process is advanced or finished

6
(No Transcript)
7
2
Countries
RESCUE Consortium
UK
F
PL
D
Proposal additional countries
NL
B
I
EU Succession Country
8
3
Kind of Brownfield
Mining 7 Sites
Mixed Ind. 1 Site
Harbour
Railway
Size
Location
20-320 ha
Inner City Outskirts In between
N.N. One that is different
Temporary uses
9
4
Stakeholder
City of Cologne (NORISC)
Our suggestion
Finance
Landowner
N.N. bank, insurance
N.N. railways
N.N., Real Estate Project Management
10
5
make 8 out of that
NL
B
I
EU Succession Country
N.N. One that is different
Temporary uses
Harbour
Railway
City of Cologne (NORISC)
Law
Landowner
N.N. Real Estate Project Management
11
5
SVT participants actual team
Type
Country
Greece
Law company, contract management
Italy
Academic, community involvement
Accession country, former military harbour land
Latvia
Finland
planning, interim uses
Sweden
Real estate management for the city
Harbour city , engineering consultancy
Netherlands
Municipal Environment and planning Department,
NORISC co-ordinator
Germany
Russian Federation
Municipality of St. Petersburg environment
12
6
Terms and conditions
workpackage leader Federal Environmental Agency,
Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Bismarckplatz 1, D-14191
Berlin, Germany Sarah Klever, Detlef Grimski,
Achim Kälberer
running time running time for the RESCUE project
and SVT until March 2005
13
7
Terms and conditions
validation work
validation work is organised according to the
commonly agreed guidance for work and
includes the participation at SVT meetings
comments on intermediate results the elaboration
of short written reports
deliverables D 8.1 D 8.5 due at the end of
August 2004 D 8.1 Technical and institutional
validation reports for the management of
contamination and reuse of soil and debris D 8.2
Technical and institutional validation reports
for the management of existing buildings and
infrastructures D 8.3 Technical and
institutional validation reports for land use and
urban design on brownfield sites D 8.4
Technical and institutional validation reports
for planning processes and methods for citizen
participation D 8.5 Technical and institutional
validation reports for the management of
brownfield projects
14
8
Terms and conditions
travel, accommodation and subsistence
travel, accommodation and subsistence is paid by
RESCUE (via UBA) SVT members are reimbursed for
travel expenses according to EU
regulations tickets a daily rate depending on
the travel destination the most economic way to
reach this destination is to be chosen 2nd class
for train rides / no higher than economy class
for flights RESCUE pays additional daily rates
if the total travel costs can be reduced by
over-the-weekend-stays the reimbursement of
travel costs template is to be used expenses are
reimbursed to the indicated bank account within
1-2 weeks on receipt o filled in form and the
respective bills
15
9
Validation
Main Objectives of the SVT according to
Description of Work
- Bridge gap to other countries and stakeholder
groups
- ensure an end-user orientated research
- monitor and review the work done
- quality control
16
10
Validation
Guidance for work Validation procedure
definition of the SVT
purpose and overall goal of the SVT
SVT s role
UBA s role
WP 2 - 6 s role
kick off meeting
meetings
communication
validation assignments
validation process
WP 8 SVT templates / documents
17
11
Time schedule
Validation of intermediate results from WP 2 WP
6
11/03 12/03 Validation of objectives
indicators
01/04 02/04 Validation of best practices
03/04 04/04 Validation of tools
03/04 04/04 Validation of incentives and
funding
monthly inquiry, every 1st of the month
05/04 08/04 Integration and final validation
of Deliverables 2.x
continuous Close cooperation with WP 10 (Manual)
18
12
Meetings
11/03 12/03 Validation of objectives
indicators 01/04 02/04 Validation of best
practices
Suggestion beginning of March 2004
03/04 04/04 Validation of tools 03/04
04/04 Validation of incentives and funding
Suggestion beginning of May 2004
05/04 08/04 Integration and final validation
of Deliverables 2.x
Suggestion beginning of August 2004
19
13
Validation
1st Validation task Objectives and indicators
(until end of December 2003)

• Check objectives
• comprehensibility
• significance
• transferability
• completeness

• Check indicators
• comprehensibility
• completeness
• significance, validity
• comparability, transferability
• data availability in practice