Interconnection for Renewables - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Interconnection for Renewables

Description:

Nevada Power vs. FERC DC Circuit Court of Appeals (twice) ... Nevada Renewable Energy Transmission Access Advisory Committee. Transmission Expansion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interconnection for Renewables


1
Interconnection for Renewables
  • Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting
  • Sparks, Nevada, October 2, 2007
  • By Brian Whalen - Manager Transmission Planning

2
Important Terms
  • FERC
  • OATT
  • OASIS
  • Order 2003
  • LGIA
  • SGIA
  • Interconnection Point
  • Network Upgrade
  • Direct Assigned Facility
  • Transmission Credit
  • PUCN
  • At or Beyond
  • RPS
  • SIS
  • Federal Power Act
  • WECC
  • NERC
  • SCADA

3
Important FERC Policies
  • Tennessee - 90 FERC 61,238
  • Identified interconnection as OATT service
  • Consumers - 95 FERC 61,233
  • Took Stability and Short Circuit out of direct
    assignment
  • Entergy - 98 FERC 61,014
  • Provided basis for At or Beyond policy
  • Nevada Power vs. FERC DC Circuit Court of
    Appeals (twice)
  • Legally tested At or Beyond we lost
  • Order 2003 (A, B, C, )
  • Established interconnection policies and pricing

4
Issues
  • Who Pays?
  • Who Rules?
  • Who Owns?
  • Who Cares?

5
Who Pays
  • The end use customer always pays
  • All the debate on funding is centered on
    confusion of who will initially pay for
    facilities.
  • All parties recover costs through energy price,
    refunds or credits, or transmission rates.
  • Up front funding of Network Upgrades by
    interconnecting party is capital intensive but
    subject to refund or credit with interest.

6
Who Rules
  • FERC has jurisdiction over interstate
    transmission, including interconnection
  • PUCN has jurisdiction over buy side decisions and
    siting
  • Local governments have SUP/Building Permit
    requirements
  • WECC/NERC have reliability requirements
  • Some of these tasks are opposed
  • For example
  • PUCN wants minimal transmission costs in native
    rates
  • FERC wants maximum resources developed and is
    eager to assist via transmission incentives
  • Local municipalities want the neighborhood
    preserved
  • WECC/NERC want reliability maximized

7
Who Owns
  • Utility owns everything from the interconnection
    point into the system.
  • Interconnecting customer owns line from
    substation to their plant.
  • Utility will own metering and SCADA at plant
  • The Utility substation fence is usually thought
    of as the demarcation point

8
Who Cares
  • US Congress
  • State Legislature
  • State Energy Office (Governor)
  • FERC
  • PUCN
  • Utility
  • Developer
  • WECC
  • NERC
  • Special interests (Sierra Club, AWEA, GRC, )
  • Government Agencies (BLM, EPA, USFS, )
  • Concerned citizens
  • In short, everybody

9
Going Forward
  • Interconnection policies are well established.
    The major remaining obstacle is finding cost
    effective sites - relative to transmission
    (existing or future) for development. With
    future transmission projects this means risk.
    Who bears that risk is the BIG question.
  • Transmission expansion
  • SPPC corridor study
  • DOE corridor studies
  • Nevada Renewable Energy Transmission Access
    Advisory Committee

10
Transmission Expansion
  • Multitude of major trans-regional projects
    proposed
  • Most are anchored by coal
  • Most are increasingly in doubt
  • Several are critically needed
  • NPC/SPPC has built 1 billion worth of
    transmission in the last 10 years including
  • Alturas 345
  • Crystal 500
  • Falcon 345
  • Centennial 500
  • NPC/SPPC has proposed in IRPs another 1 billion
    worth of transmission in the next 10 years
    including
  • EN-ti 500
  • Ft Sage 345
  • Emma 345
  • Sunrise 500

11
SPPC Corridor Study
  • SPPC IRP filing
  • Requested 4 million dollars to do routing and
    siting studies on several potential corridors.
    Corridors are likely future transmission for
    renewables.

12
DOE Corridor Studies
  • EPaAct2005 established 2 process
  • Section 368 provided for identification and a
    PEIS on strategic transmission corridors on
    federal land in the west
  • Section 1221 provided for the identification of
    national interest transmission corridors to be
    used under FERCs new backstop siting authority
  • Both have become politically entangled and have
    been delayed significantly

13
Nevada Energy Office
  • Nevada Renewable Energy Transmission Access
    Advisory Committee
  • Establishing multi-resource mapping system to aid
    in renewable development
  • Includes exclusionary areas and resource
    potentials

14
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com