Title: The Dream
1?? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??, ???? ??
2The Dream
- Itd be great if machines could
- Process our email (usefully)
- Translate languages accurately
- Help us manage, summarize, and aggregate
information - Use speech as a UI (when needed)
- Talk to us / listen to us
- But they cant
- Language is complex, ambiguous, flexible, and
subtle - Good solutions need linguistics and machine
learning knowledge - So
3What is NLP?
- Fundamental goal deep understand of broad
language - Not just string processing or keyword matching!
- End systems that we want to build
- Ambitious speech recognition, machine
translation, information extraction, dialog
interfaces, question answering, trend finding - Modest spelling correction, text categorization
4Speech Systems
- Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)
- Audio in, text out
- SOTA 0.3 for digit strings, 5 dictation, 50
TV - Text to Speech (TTS)
- Text in, audio out
- SOTA totally intelligible (if sometimes
unnatural) - Speech systems currently
- Model the speech signal
- Model language
5Machine Translation
- Translation systems encode
- Something about fluent language
- Something about how two languages correspond
(middle of term) - SOTA for easy language pairs, better than
nothing, but more an understanding aid than a
replacement for human translators
6Information Extraction
- Information Extraction (IE)
- Unstructured text to database entries
- SOTA perhaps 70 accuracy for multi-sentence
temples, 90 for single easy fields
7Question Answering
- Question Answering
- More than search
- Ask general comprehension questions of a document
collection - Can be really easy Whats the capital of
Wyoming? - Can be harder How many US states capitals are
also their largest cities? - Can be open ended What are the main issues in
the global warming debate? - SOTA Can do factoids, even when text isnt a
perfect match
8What is nearby NLP?
- Computational Linguistics
- Using computational methods to learn more about
how language works - We end up doing this and using it
- Cognitive Science
- Figuring out how the human brain works
- Includes the bits that do language
- Humans the only working NLP prototype!
- Speech?
- Mapping audio signals to text
- Traditionally separate from NLP, converging?
- Two components acoustic models and language
models - Language models in the domain of stat NLP
9What is this Class?
- Three aspects to the course
- Linguistic Issues
- What are the range of language phenomena?
- What are the knowledge sources that let us
disambiguate? - What representations are appropriate?
- Technical Methods
- Learning and parameter estimation
- Increasingly complex model structures
- Efficient algorithms dynamic programming, search
- Engineering Methods
- Issues of scale
- Sometimes, very ugly hacks
- Well focus on what makes the problems hard, and
what works in practice
10Class Requirements and Goals
- Class requirements
- Uses a variety of skills / knowledge
- Basic probability and statistics
- Basic linguistics background
- Decent coding skills (Java)
- Most people are probably missing one of the above
- Well address some review concepts with sections,
TBD - Class goals
- Learn the issues and techniques of statistical
NLP - Build the real tools used in NLP (language
models, taggers, parsers, translation systems) - Be able to read current research papers in the
field - See where the gaping holes in the field are!
11Rational versus Empiricist Approaches toLanguage
(I)
- Question What prior knowledge should be built
into our models of NLP? - Rationalist Answer A significant part of the
knowledge in the human mind is not derived by the
senses but is fixed in advance, presumably by
genetic inheritance (Chomsky poverty of the
stimulus). - Empiricist Answer The brain is able to perform
association, pattern recognition, and
generalization and, thus, the structures of
Natural Language can be learned.
12Rational versus Empiricist Approaches toLanguage
(II)
- Chomskyan/generative linguists seek to describe
the language module of the human mind (the
Ilanguage) for which data such as text (the
Elanguage) provide only indirect evidence, which
can be supplemented by native speakers
intuitions. - Empiricists approaches are interested in
describing the E-language as it actually occurs. - Chomskyans make a distinction between linguistic
competence and linguistic performance. They
believe that linguistic competence can be
described in isolation while Empiricists reject
this notion.
13Empiricist
- Seeks methods that can work on raw text as it
exists - Knowledge induction (automatic learning), not by
disambiguation - American structuralism
- The work of Shannon
- Assign probabilities on linguistic events
compared to concentrating on categorical
judgments about rare types of sentences
14??
- ???? ???? ?? ?
- ??? ??? ?????
- ??? ?? ??? ???, ??, ??????
- ??? ??? ??? ???, ? ???? ??? ???? ??????
- ?????? ??? ??? ??
- In additions to this, she insisted that women
were regarded as a different existence from men
unfairly. - (???? ??? ??? ? ?)
- take a while, sort of/kind of,
- I kind of love you.(??)
15Some Early NLP History
- 1950s
- Foundational work automata, information theory,
etc. - First speech systems
- Machine translation (MT) hugely funded by
military (imagine that) - Toy models MT using basically word-substitution
- Optimism!
- 1960s and 1970s NLP Winter
- Bar-Hillel (FAHQT) and ALPAC reports kills MT
- Work shifts to deeper models, syntax
- but toy domains / grammars (SHRDLU, LUNAR)
- 1980s The Empirical Revolution
- Expectations get reset
- Corpus-based methods become central
- Deep analysis often traded for robust and simple
approximations - Evaluate everything
16Todays Approach to NLP
- From 1970-1989, people were concerned with the
science of the mind and built small (toy) systems
that attempted to behave intelligently. - Recently, there has been more interest on
engineering practical solutions using automatic
learning (knowledge induction). - While Chomskyans tend to concentrate on
categorical judgements about very rare types of
sentences, statistical NLP practitioners
concentrate on common types of sentences.
17Why is NLP Difficult?
- NLP is difficult because Natural Language is
highly ambiguous. - Example The company is training workers has 2
or more parse trees (i.e., syntactic analyses). - List the sales of the products produced in 1973
with the products produced in 1972 has 455
parses. - Therefore, a practical NLP system must be good at
making disambiguation decisions of word sense,
word category, syntactic structure, and semantic
scope.
18Methods that dont work well
- Maximizing coverage while minimizing ambiguity is
inconsistent with symbolic NLP. - Furthermore, hand-coded syntactic constraints and
preference rules are time consuming to build, do
not scale up well and are brittle in the face of
the extensive use of metaphor in language. - Example if we code
- animate being --gt swallow --gt physical object
- I swallowed his story, hook, line, and
sinker. - The supernova swallowed the planet.
19Classical NLP Parsing
- Write symbolic or logical rules
- Use deduction systems to prove parses from words
- Minimal grammar on Fed raises sentence 36
parses - Simple 10-rule grammar 592 parses
- Real-size grammar many millions of parses
- This scaled very badly, didnt yield
broad-coverage tools
20NLP Annotation
- Much of NLP is annotating text with structure
which specifies how its assembled. - Syntax grammatical structure
- Semantics meaning, either lexical or
compositional
21What Made NLP Hard?
- The core problems
- Ambiguity
- Sparsity
- Scale
- Unmodeled Variables
22Problem Ambiguities
- Headlines
- Iraqi Head Seeks Arms
- Ban on Nude Dancing on Governors Desk
- Juvenile Court to Try Shooting Defendant
- Teacher Strikes Idle Kids
- Stolen Painting Found by Tree
- Kids Make Nutritious Snacks
- Local HS Dropouts Cut in Half
- Hospitals Are Sued by 7 Foot Doctors
- Why are these funny?
23Syntactic Ambiguities
- Maybe were sunk on funny headlines, but normal,
boring sentences are unambiguous? - Our company is training workers.
- Fed raises interest rates 0.5 in a measure
against inflation
24Dark Ambiguities
- Dark ambiguities most analyses are shockingly
bad (meaning, they dont have an interpretation
you can get your mind around) - Unknown words and new usages
- Solution We need mechanisms to focus attention
on the best ones, probabilistic techniques do this
25Semantic Ambiguities
- Even correct tree-structured syntactic analyses
dont always nail down the meaning - Every morning someones alarm clock wakes me up
- Johns boss said he was doing better
26Other Levels of Language
- Tokenization/morphology
- What are the words, what is the sub-word
structure? - Often simple rules work (period after Mr. isnt
sentence break) - Relatively easy in English, other languages are
harder - Segmentation
- Morphology
- Discourse how do sentences relate to each other?
- Pragmatics what intent is expressed by the
literal meaning, how to react to an utterance? - Phonetics acoustics and physical production of
sounds - Phonology how sounds pattern in a language
27Disambiguation for Applications
- Sometimes life is easy
- Can do text classification pretty well just
knowing the set of words used in the document,
same for authorship attribution - Word-sense disambiguation not usually needed for
web search because of majority effects or
intersection effects (jaguar habitat isnt the
car) - Sometimes only certain ambiguities are relevant
- Other times, all levels can be relevant (e.g.,
translation)
he hoped to record a world record
28Problem Scale
- People did know that language was ambiguous!
- but they hoped that all interpretations would be
good ones (or ruled out pragmatically) - they didnt realize how bad it would be
29Corpora
- A corpus is a collection of text
- Often annotated in some way
- Sometimes just lots of text
- Balanced vs. uniform corpora
- Examples
- Newswire collections 500M words
- Brown corpus 1M words of tagged balanced text
- Penn Treebank 1M words of parsed WSJ
- Canadian Hansards 10M words of aligned French /
English sentences - The Web billions of words of who knows what
30Corpus-Based Methods
- A corpus like a treebank gives us three important
tools - It gives us broad coverage
31Corpus-Based Methods
- It gives us statistical information
This is a very different kind of
subject/object asymmetry than what many linguists
are interested in.
32Corpus-Based Methods
- It lets us check our answers!
33Problem Sparsity
- However sparsity is always a problem
- New unigram (word), bigram (word pair), and rule
rates in newswire
34The (Effective) NLP Cycle
- Pick a problem (usually some disambiguation)
- Get a lot of data (usually a labeled corpus)
- Build the simplest thing that could possibly work
- Repeat
- See what the most common errors are
- Figure out what information a human would use
- Modify the system to exploit that information
- Feature engineering
- Representation design
- Machine learning methods
- Were going to do this over and over again
35Language isnt Adversarial
- One nice thing we know NLP can be done!
- Language isnt adversarial
- Its produced with the intent of being understood
- With some understanding of language, you can
often tell what knowledge sources are relevant - But most variables go unmodeled
- Some knowledge sources arent easily available
(realworld knowledge, complex models of other
peoples plans) - Some kinds of features are beyond our technical
ability to model (especially cross-sentence
correlations)
36??? ???? ??? ??!!
- Epistemological accuracy!!
- ???????.
- ?????. ?????, ????
- ?????. ?????
- ?????.
37What Statistical NLP can do for us
- Disambiguation strategies that rely on
hand-coding produce a knowledge acquisition
bottleneck and perform poorly on naturally
occurring text. - A Statistical NLP approach seeks to solve these
problems by automatically learning lexical and
structural preferences from corpora. In
particular, Statistical NLP recognizes that there
is a lot of information in the relationships
between words. - The use of statistics offers a good solution to
the ambiguity problem statistical models are
robust, generalize well, and behave gracefully in
the presence of errors and new data
38Corpora
- Brown Corpus 1 million words
- British National Corpus 100 mil. Words
- American National Corpus 10 mil. words -gt 100
- Penn TreeBank - parsed WSJ text
- Canadian Hansard parallel corpus (bilingual)
- Dictionaries
- Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
- WordNet (hierarchy of synsets)
39Things that can be done with Text Corpora
(I)Word Counts
- Word Counts to find out
- What are the most common words in the text.
- How many words are in the text (word tokens and
word types). - What the average frequency of each word in the
text is. - Limitation of word counts Most words appear very
infrequently and it is hard to predict much about
the behavior of words that do not occur often in
a corpus. gt Zipfs Law.
40Things that can be done with Text Corpora
(II)Zipfs Law
- If we count up how often each word type of a
language occurs in a large corpus and then list
the words in order of their frequency of
occurrence, we can explore the relationship
between the frequency of a word, f, and its
position in the list, known as its rank, r. - Zipfs Law says that f ? 1/r
- Significance of Zipfs Law For most words, our
data about their use will be exceedingly sparse.
Only for a few words will we have a lot of
examples.
41Common words in Tom Sawyer
42Frequencies of frequencies in Tom Sawyer
43Zipf's law in Tom Sawyer
44Zipf's law in Tom Sawyer
45Zipfs Law
46Zipf's law for the Brown corpus
47Mandelbrot's formula for the Brown corpus
48Things that can be done with Text Corpora
(III)Collocations
- A collocation is any turn of phrase or accepted
usage where somehow the whole is perceived as
having an existence beyond the sum of its parts
(e.g., disk drive, make up, bacon and eggs). - Collocations are important for machine
translation. - Collocations can be extracted from a text
(example, the most common bigrams can be
extracted). However, since these bigrams are
often insignificant (e.g., at the, of a),
they can be filtered.
49?? ?
- drive ? disk drive, make up
- ?? ? ?? ?? ? ?? ??
- ?? ? ???? ? ??? ??
- ??? ?? ?? ???.
- ?? ???? ??
- ??? ?? ????, ??? ??? ??. ?? ?? ??? ???? ???
- ????????? (?? ??, ?? ??)
50??
- bigram of the, in the, to the, on the . New
York, he said, as a - Filtering adjectivenoun, nounnoun
- last year, next year ???
51Commonest bigrams in the NYT
52Filtered common bigrams in the NYT
53Things that can be done with Text Corpora
(IV)Concordances
- Finding concordances corresponds to finding the
different contexts in which a given word occurs. - One can use a Key Word In Context (KWIC)
concordancing program. - Concordances are useful both for building
dictionaries for learners of foreign languages
and for guiding statistical parsers.
54KWIC display
55Syntactic frames for showed in Tom Sawyer
56Why study NLP Statistically?
- Up until the late 1980s, NLP was mainly
investigated using a rule-based approach. - However, rules appear too strict to characterize
peoples use of language. - This is because people tend to stretch and bend
rules in order to meet their communicative
needs. - Methods for making the modeling of language
more accurate are needed and statistical methods
appear to provide the necessary flexibility.
57Subdivisions of NLP
- Parts of Speech and Morphology (words, their
syntactic function in sentences, and the various
forms they can take). - Phrase Structure and Syntax (regularities and
constraints of word order and phrase structure). - Semantics (the study of the meaning of words
(lexical semantics) and of how word meanings are
combined into the meaning of sentences, etc.) - Pragmatics (the study of how knowledge about the
world and language conventions interact with
literal meaning).
58Topics Covered in this course
59Tools and Resources Used
- Probability/Statistical Theory Statistical
Distributions, Bayesian Decision Theory. - Linguistics Knowledge Morphology, Syntax,
Semantics and Pragmatics. - Corpora Bodies of marked or unmarked text to
which statistical methods and current linguistic
knowledge can be applied in order to discover
novel linguistic theories or interesting and
useful knowledge organization.
60Textbook and other useful information
- Foundations of Statistical Natural Language
Processing, by Chris Manning and Hinrich Schütze,
MIT Press, 1999. - Course Website borame.cs.pusan.ac.kr