Harley Davidson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Harley Davidson

Description:

Acquired a majority share of the Buell Motorcycle Company ... Introduced a completely new twin-cam 88 engine into its Dyna and Touring motorcycle models. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:5864
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: Meli389
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Harley Davidson


1
Harley Davidson
  • Matthew Buchman
  • Ember Foster
  • Becca Hafner
  • Melissa Henson
  • Jessica Krantz

2
Outline
  • Introduction Ember
  • Silk - Melissa
  • SWOT Matt
  • Problems - Jessica
  • Recommendations Becca
  • QA

3
Introduction
4
Harley Facts
  • Founded in 1903 by William Harley and Arthur
    Davidson
  • 1920 largest motorcycle manufacturer in world
  • 28,000 motorcycles per year in 67 countries

5
More Facts
  • Employed about 6,000 people and supported over
    600 independently owned U.S. dealerships
  • Headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • manufacturing facilities - Wisconsin,
    Pennsylvania, and Missouri
  • Wholly owned subsidiaries in Germany, the United
    Kingdom, Benelux, France and Japan

6
Plan 2003
  • Increase production capacity dramatically over
    eight years by the companys 100th anniversary

7
1998
  • Acquired a majority share of the Buell Motorcycle
    Company
  • Successfully brought two new manufacturing
    facilities online
  • Introduced a completely new twin-cam 88 engine
    into its Dyna and Touring motorcycle models.

8
Organizational Structure
  • 3 interlocking circles
  • Create Demand (CDC)
  • Produce Products Group (PPG)
  • Provide Support (PSC)

9
SiLK Implementation of Supply Management System
10
SiLK
  • Supplier Information Link
  • Implementing procurement and supplier information
    system.

11
SMS
  • Supply Management System
  • Goal of SMS
  • Right Products
  • Right Time
  • Best Quality
  • Lowest Cost

12
Value Proposition
  • Changes in people, processes, and technology.
  • 5 year purchasing cost reduction of 34 million.
  • Began by mapping as is processes.

13
Value Proposition
  • Mapped to be processes representing future
    visions.
  • Request for quote (RFQ) submitted by eight
    suppliers
  • Three finalists

14
Provider 1
  • Proposal was precise
  • Natural affinity toward representatives
  • Behind in functionality
  • Aware of change management issues

15
Provider 2
  • Widely admired in industry
  • Extremely professional
  • Highest score on functionality
  • Did not emphasize change management issues

16
Provider 3
  • Initial presentation was a disaster
  • Scored high in functionality
  • Weak focus on social dimensions

17
SWOT ANALYSIS
18
Strengths
  • Brand name
  • Management team
  • Heritage

19
Weaknesses
  • Size of the SiL'K
  • Rooted into their heritage rooted into their
    heritage

20
Opportunities
  • Better flow of supply
  • Buell Motorcycles
  • Market share increase due to older generations

21
Threats
  • Foreign competition
  • Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, and Kawasaki

22
Problems
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
  • Risk Assessment Score

27
(No Transcript)
28
Problems
  • Implementation Risk
  • Grand Scope of Project
  • Past Encouraged Site Independence
  • Large number of opinions involved
  • Technology Risk
  • Many IT improvements at once
  • Unfamiliarity will require many hours in training
  • How will it fit in with our current processes to
    offer enhancement

29
Problems
  • High Tension Between Innovation Control
  • Rooted in Heritage Rooted in Old Processes
  • Requisition of Radical Changes to Procedures

30
Problems
  • Create Supplier Relationships
  • SMS Goal 70 time spent on Strategic Supply
    Activities

31
Problems
  • 5. Who should Harley-Davidson
  • chose to partner with for the design and
  • implementation of SiLK?

32
Recommendations
33
Recommendations
Management at Harley-Davidson needs to address
the high tension between innovation and control
throughout the company
34
Recommendations
  • Who should the SiLK team choose as their
    supplier and partner in implementing an
    enterprisewide procurement and supplier
    management system?
  • Provider 1
  • Provider 2
  • Provider 3

Provider 1
35
Evaluation of Providers Using a Quantitative
Approach Based on each providers self-rated
match to the technology and process requirements
outlined in the functional specification.
36
Evaluation of Providers Using a Qualitative
Approach
Grades chosen to highlight the potential
providers understanding of Harley-Davidsons
current and future requirements. (L low M
medium H high)
37
Recommendations
  • Provider 1
  • Understood Harley-Davidsons needs
  • Change management and training processes were an
    integral part of its implementation
    methodology
  • Cost advantage when compared to other provider
  • Similar company culture

38
Q A
39
Question 1
  • Profile HD's strengths and weaknesses.

40
Question 2
  • What was the driving force behind the need for a
    new supply process?

41
Question 3
  • What is the SiL'K supply system?  What are some
    of the proposed benefits?

42
Question 4
  • If you were management, which supplier would you
    choose and why?

43
Question 5
  • Why do you think it is taking such a long time
    for the SiL'K supply system to be installed? 
    What are some of managment's major concerns that
    must be addressed?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com