Chapter 2 Demand and Total Revenue

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 2 Demand and Total Revenue

Description:

I remember Arthur Wirtz (former owner of the Chicago Blackhawks, dec. ... Guesses about class demand for college basketball. Demand: Quantifying scarcity. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 2 Demand and Total Revenue


1
Chapter 2Demand and Total Revenue
  • To Accompany
  • Sports Economics 2ED
  • Rodney Fort
  • (PrenticeHall, 2006)
  • I remember Arthur Wirtz (former owner of the
    Chicago Blackhawks, dec. 1983) delivering his
    most famous line. Somebody said, We need some
    paint for the seats, and Arthur said, We dont
    need paint, we need asses.
  • -Stan Mikita, former Blackhawk great.

2
Overview
  • Demand, its variation across sports and market
    power.
  • Demand and sports fan welfare.
  • Demand, elasticity, total revenue and marginal
    revenue in sports.
  • Price discrimination.
  • Revenue variation and competitive imbalance in
    sports.

3
Introduction
  • Old fans like me argue that the hoopla and
    commercialism have greatly compromised the
    gentler game we loved But who is buying the
    T-shirts, fawning (and pawning) over every
    utility infielder for autographs.. Us of course
    nobody but us How can we moan that baseball has
    fallen to mammon when we willingly rushed into
    each new purchase?
  • - Stephen Jay Gould, natural scientist and
    baseball fan.

4
Scarcity in Sports
  • The inescapable chain
  • Scarcity
  • gt Rationing
  • gt Competition.
  • Whence the scarcity?
  • Prowess.
  • Competition.
  • Commonality.
  • Winning.

5
Worth Some Thought. . .
  • Absolute and relative competition.
  • In any game, we care about the teams relative
    skills. But. . .
  • We also care about the level of competition
    minor v. major leagues, mens v. womens
    versions.
  • Implications for PEDs.

6
The Amazing Rod
  • Guesses about class demand for college basketball.

7
Demand Quantifying scarcity.
  • Remember the definition
  • The relationship between price and quantity
    demanded, all else held constant.

Ticket Price
Individual Team Demand As price rises, fewer
people attend.
Attendance
8
Demand shifters.
  • Whats held constant?
  • Preferences- especially for team quality.
  • Fan income.
  • The price of other goods enjoyed by fans.
  • Fan expectations about the future
  • Population.

9
Lets See If You Get It
  • Sometimes, it seems that demand curves slope
    upward
  • Ticket prices and attendance over time appear to
    be positively related.
  • Many factors can change over time, so that demand
    is shifting, rather than upward sloping!

10
Market power in sports
  • Why the downward slope at the individual team
    level?
  • Market power for teams.
  • Teams make it happen through leagues and
    conferences
  • Exclusive territory membership control.
  • Exceptions?
  • When population warrants more than one team.

11
Tool Time!
  • So far, covering concepts of demand.
  • But we need some tools to actually analyze it!
  • Buyers surpluses.
  • Elasticity.
  • Total and Marginal Revenue.

12
Buyers Surpluses
Ticket Price
At some price, willingness to pay (wtp) on every
unit exceeds price. Summation-gt buyers
surpluses.
wtp
P0
Attendance
A0
13
Elasticity, total and marginal revenue.
Lower price, response exceeds price reduction, so
revenues rise GL gt 0. Elastic region.
Ticket Price
P0
L
P1
C
G
Attendance
A1
A0
14
Elasticity
Ticket Price
Lower price, response less than price reduction,
so revenues fall GL lt 0. Inelastic region.
Switch Point
P0
L
P1
G
C
Attendance
A1
A0
Abar
15
Team Total Revenue
Ticket Price

Eventually, increase output, decrease TR.
Max TR
At first, increase output, increase TR.
Demand
Elastic Demand
Inelastic Demand
TR
Attend.
Abar
Abar
16
Marginal Revenue
  • Definition MR .
  • In the limit, MR is the slope of the TR function.
  • Derivation Just track the slope of TR as output
    increases.

17
Marginal Revenue

Max TR
MR 0
Inelastic Demand
Elastic Demand
MR gt 0, Declining
MR lt 0
TR
Attend.
Abar
18
A Simple Trick
  • For linear demand
  • Demand P a bX.
  • TR PX aX bX 2.
  • MR ? TR/ ? X a 2bX (exponent rule).
  • So For linear demand, MR has the same
    y-intercept, but is twice as steep, as the demand
    function.

19
Lesson 1 inelastic pricing?
  • At A0, reduce attendance, increase revenue and
    lower cost. Unless
  • Attendance-related revenue offsets (concessions,
    parking, memorabilia)

Max TR
Inelastic Demand
Elastic Demand
MR gt 0, Declining
MR lt 0
TR
Attend.
A0
Abar
20
Lesson 2 shifting demand and total revenue.
  • Increasing attendance can only take you so far in
    your aim to increase revenue.
  • Eventually, the only recourse is to shift the
    total revenue function.
  • How can this happen?
  • Something must increase demand.
  • Any ideas?

21
Lesson 2, contd.
  • Rules Innovations Expanded play-offs, rules
    changes, rules enforcement.
  • Other Innovations Half-time shows, cheerleaders
    (then pro cheerleaders), musical interludes,
    applause-meter races, DiamondVision, mascots,
    food service, the incredible exploding woman,
    Eddy Goedel, uniform innovations and sales.
  • Just go to a minor league baseball game to find
    out whats coming next.

22
Lesson 2 corollary Pricing to capacity?
  • Teams generally inherit stadium capacity in the
    short run, its fixed.
  • Can it make sense that revenues are highest if
    the stadium is not sold out?
  • Yes! If capacity exceeds Abar. (and
    attendance-related revenues dont more than make
    up the difference!)
  • In the longer term, alter capacity, but that can
    be a long time coming. (MLBs move to new,
    smaller venues).

23
Price Discrimination
  • If
  • Can tell fans apart, somehow.
  • Resale can be prevented.
  • Enforcement is cheap enough.
  • Then
  • Charge different fans different prices for the
    same game.
  • Charge the same fan a lower price for successive
    games purchased all at once.

24
Price Discrimination Methods
  • Different prices to different fans
  • Student discounts.
  • Faculty discounts.
  • What about different prices for different
    locations? Or different times during the season?
  • Nope. The quality of the good has changed! Not
    selling the same product to different people.

25
Price Discrimination Methods
  • Different prices to the same buyer
  • Buy one, get one half price.
  • Season ticket prices lower than summed cost of
    individual attendance.
  • Family Plan quantity discounts.
  • What about season tickets that cost the same
    amount as individual attendance?
  • Nope. Paying to reserve a particular seat.
  • Raises another interesting issue. . . .

26
Price Discrimination PSLs
  • Each fan will pay more than P, e.g., V0 gt P for
    attendance A0. How can sellers get it?

Ticket Price
V0
P
Demand
Attendance
A0
27
PSLs, contd.
  • Need even more information
  • What is the level of the surplus, V0 gt P.
  • Offer rights to a particular seat, for the entire
    season, but require payment equal to V0 gt P
    so-called donation seating or, in the pros,
    personal seat licenses.
  • Charge P for the tickets in addition to the
    donation.
  • Result . . . .

28
PSLs, contd.
  • Extract V0 gt P, for all buyers.

Ticket Price
Additional Revenue
V0
P
D
Attendance
A0
29
Pro Revenue Data, 2005
30
Small v. Large Market
  • Important Point of Analysis
  • Much is bandied in the press about small and
    large market teams. But just what does this
    mean? Data show that it doesnt always go by
    population. Well take DeepThroats advice and.
    . . .
  • Follow the money.

31
A Useful Construct
  • Comparing Small and Large Market Teams
  • Large and small only can be meaningful in
    terms of revenue.
  • Demand (willingness to pay) for sports is greater
    in some places.
  • Large can be taken to mean a greater
    willingness to pay for all levels.

32
A Useful Construct Contd
  • GB Packers, large or small market?
  • Pop (incl. Milwaukee) 1.8 million
  • NFL city ave. Pop 3.7 million
  • 05 revenues 194 million, 12th in NFL
  • NFL team ave. revenues 192 million
  • NFL team median revs 186 million
  • NFL team min. revenue 158 (AZ)
  • So, Packers are
  • Half the ave. pop. Right at ave. rev.
  • 5 greater than median rev.
  • 23 greater than min. rev.

33
A Useful Construct Contd
  • Always think of teams in terms of market revenue
    potential
  • Larger potential Larger market team
  • Lower potential Smaller market team.
  • Go back to the general data NYY top MLB, NYI
    bottom NHL!

34
And Dont Forget Things Change!
  • A Revenue Tale of Two Cities (MLB)
  • 1990
    2005
  • Atlanta Braves 25/26 12/30
  • Seattle Mariners 26/26 8/30
  • It is typically true that larger revenue market
    teams dominate, but dont forget that the faces
    change.

35
Summary
  • Demand, its variation across sports and market
    power.
  • Demand and sports fan welfare.
  • Demand, elasticity, total revenue and marginal
    revenue in sports.
  • Price discrimination.
  • Revenue variation and competitive imbalance in
    sports.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)