Application of High Performance Materials to Bridges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Application of High Performance Materials to Bridges

Description:

Introduction: Development of MMFX. A new microcomposite steel reinforcement ... Methods: Beam Design. Beam reinforcement ... More Tensile and Strength Testing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: CEE1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Application of High Performance Materials to Bridges


1
Application of High Performance Materials to
Bridges
  • Strength Evaluation of MMFX
  • By Judd Galloway
  • Advisor Professor Michael J Chajes
  • Chair of the CE Dept.
  • University of Delaware
  • Funded by NSF - REU

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Test Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations for Future Research

3
Introduction Development of MMFX
  • A new microcomposite steel reinforcement
  • Corrosion Resistant (75 yr)
  • Stronger (110ksi)
  • Ductile Failure mode

4
Introduction to MMFX
Corroded rebar in Bridge Decks
5
Introduction Research FocusStrength Evaluation
Composite Behavior
  • From Bridge Decks to Floor Beams and Girders

6
Test Methods Strength Testing
  • Tensile Test
  • Generate a stress vs. strain diagram
  • Flexure Test
  • Reinforced Concrete Beams
  • MMFX, Clad, Normal (A615)

7
Test Methods Beam Design
Resulted in 4 in. x 6in. x 60 in (5ft) beams
8
Test Methods Beam Design
  • Beam reinforcement
  • 1 6 stainless steel clad rebar
  • 1 6 normal A615 steel rebar
  • 1 6 MMFX rebar
  • 3 4 MMFX rebar
  • 1 4 A615 rebar

9
Test Methods 3 point bending
All specimens were monotically loaded to failure
10
Test Methods Tensile Test
MMFX
A615
11
Test Methods Concrete Strength
  • Compression testing

average fc 6000 psi
12
Results Tensile Test
13
Results Tensile Test
MMFX
fy 153.5 ksi
Stress (ksi)
fy 61.2 ksi
A615
Strain ()
14
Graph of the Load vs. Strain generated from 3
point bending tests of reinforced concrete beams
MMFX design yield line strain 3800
MMFX experimental yield line strain 3100
15
Results 3 point bending
16
Conclusions
  • More evaluation of test data needs to be
    conducted
  • MMFX is stronger in tension and in flexure than
    A615
  • Direct substitutions of MMFX for A615 is not
    recommended
  • The yield stress and ultimate stress in concrete
    beams reinforced with MMFX might be significantly
    different.

17
Future Research
  • More Tensile and Strength Testing
  • Investigate the magnetism as a means of
    non-destructive evaluation

18
Acknowledgements
  • Thanks to Gary Wenczel and Danny Richardson
  • Thanks to Dr. Chajes
  • The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com