Lupus Nephritis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Lupus Nephritis

Description:

Lupus Nephritis. Jackie Nam. Introduction. 60 75% of pts with SLE ... Data from the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial (ELNT) suggest that such a low ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:5835
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Kar9239
Category:
Tags: lupus | nephritis

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lupus Nephritis


1
Lupus Nephritis
  • Jackie Nam

2
Introduction
  • 60 75 of pts with SLE
  • Probably the most serious complication
  • Differs in clinical pattern, severity , prognosis
    treatment

3
Pathogenesis
  • Autoimmune

MHC II on APC/ B cell
Costimulatory molecules Eg. CD 40/ 40L B7/
CD 28 B7/ CTLA4
T cell
Polyclonal B cell activation
Formation of autoreactive antibodies vs nuclear
Ag other self Ag
Ab/ Ag complexes ( preformed or in situ)
Binding damage to GBM
C activation
Recruitment of polys mononuclear cells
RENAL DAMAGE
4
Pathology
  • GLOMERULUS
  • Mesangial deposits
  • Subendothelial mesangial
  • Subepithelial
  • Widespread scarring
  • Interstitium
  • Tubules
  • Vessels
  • Histologic class
  • II
  • III IV
  • V
  • VI

5
WHO Classification of LN
  • I. Normal glomeruli
  • Normal by all techniques
  • Normal on LM but deposits on immunohistology /
    or EM
  • II. Pure mesangial alterations
  • A. mesangial widening /or mild
    hypercellularity
  • B. mesangial cell proliferation
  • III. Focal segmental GN ( focal proliferative GN)
  • A. active necrotising lesions
  • B. active sclerosing lesions
  • C. sclerosing lesions

6
WHO Classification of LN ( cont.)
  • IV. Diffuse proliferative GN
  • ( severe mesangial/ mesangiocapillary with
    extensive subendothelial deposits. Mesangial
    deposits always present frequent subepithelial
    deposits)
  • A. with segmental lesions
  • B. With active necrotising lesions
  • C. with active sclerosing lesions
  • D. with sclerosing lesions
  • V. Diffuse membranous GN
  • A. Pure membranous GN
  • B. associated with lesions of category II
  • VI. Advances sclerosing GN

7
Renal manifestations
  • Tend to appear within the 1st 2yrs of SLE
  • Almost ½ have asymptomatic urine abnormalities
  • Proteinuria - dominant feature
  • Haematuria almost always present but not in
    isolation
  • Nephrotic
  • Severe nephritis
  • ARF occassionally
  • ? GFR in ½
  • Revised criteria for classification of SLE
  • Proteinuria 0,5g / day or 3
  • Casts rbc/ granular/ tubular/ mixed

8
Lab investigations
  • Monitoring with regular urinalysis serum
    creatinine
  • Screen all pts with proteinuria for ANA
  • Anti ds DNA
  • In about 60 with SLE
  • Levels often reflect disease activity
  • ? with Rx ( ANA remains )
  • If normal safe to ? Rx in chronic phase
  • ? complement
  • In ¾ untreated esp. with nephritis
  • APLA
  • In 1/3 to ½
  • Associated with renal arterial, venous
    glomerular thrombosis

9
Clinicopathologic correlates
  • Many are asymptomatic insidiously progressive
  • More severe histologic forms tend to have more
    severe clinical findings
  • But histology cannot be predicted with certainty
  • No clinical features - may have significant
    glomerular disease on biopsy
  • ? BIOPSY NB

10
Indications for renal biopsy
  • Clinical lab features DPGN
  • Biopsy may not be necessary prior to Rx
  • Abnormal clinical lab features
  • Lowgrade
  • Compatible with more than one form of LN
  • ?Biopsy may alter Rx

11
(No Transcript)
12
Histology
  • 1995 WHO Classification of Lupus Nephritis
  • ½ Class III IV
  • 10 15 class V
  • Focus on glomerular lesions
  • 50 of changes in interstitium
  • In a few ATN occurs in absence of glomerular
    disease ? ARF
  • Glomerular lesions not static
  • May undergo transition with time eg from Class IV
    to V with Rx

13
NIH activity Chronicity index
  • 2nd classification
  • Assessment of inflammation ( activity)
    permanent damage from scarring fibrosis
    (chronicity)
  • Includes glomeruli TIN features
  • Useful for prognosis, guide to Rx
  • Chronicity worse outcome
  • Helpful to monitor Rx response on repeat biopsies

14
(No Transcript)
15
Prognosis
  • Predictors of poor prognosis
  • Black race
  • Male
  • Anaemia
  • ? creatinine
  • Nephrotic range proteinuria
  • Glomerular tubulointerstitial scarring
  • Severe tubulointerstitial nephritis
  • Chroniciy index 3

16
Treatment aims
  • Recognise early renal involvement
  • Induce maintain remission decrease risk of
    progression to ESRD
  • Minimise Rx related toxicity ( esp. during
    maintenance phase )

17
Treatment
  • Induction
  • Maintenance
  • short courses associated with relapses

18
Treatment options (1)
  • Corticosteroids (CS)
  • In all groups
  • No trials of CS vs no CS
  • Pulse medrol no formal studies impression of
    rapid control
  • Cyclophosphamide ( CP)
  • Intermittent pulse CP DOC in mod severe
    disease
  • Oral CP used
  • Infections, cervical dysplasia, gonadal toxicity
  • Azathiaprine (Aza)
  • Remarkably safe
  • Leucopaenia, hepatotoxicity, marginal risk of
    malignancy
  • Safe in pregnancy
  • Primary Rx in mild forms in pts strongly
    oppposed to CP

19
Treatment options (2)
  • Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
  • Toxicity of CP prompted a search for effective
    less toxic Rx for LN
  • Inhibits de novo pathway of purine synthesis ?
    lymphocyte production
  • Leukopaenia, nausea, diarrhoea, infections
  • Shown to be effective but concern re relapse in
    severe disease
  • Recent trial short term Rx with IVI CP
    followed by maintenance Rx with MMF or Aza more
    efficacious safer than long-term Rx with IVI
    CP.
  • ( NEJM march 4, 2004 vol 350 (10) 971- 80)

20
Treatment options (3)
  • Cyclosporin A
  • Evaluated in extrarenal manifestations few
    studies in LN
  • Corticosteroid sparing effect in children
  • flares of disease activity during Rx or when the
    drug is tapered
  • may be used in combination with other
    immunosuppressives
  • should not be used as monotherapy
  • Low dose no permanent nephrotoxicity
  • Monitor levels if higher doses used
  • Monitor renal function
  • Plasmapharesis
  • no benefit

21
Mild mesangial LN
  • good prognosis
  • no specific therapy
  • more aggressive disease
  • oral CS
  • ? AZA if initial response is poor

22
Proliferative GN (1)
  • Immunosuppression most beneficial
  • NIH Rx trials
  • CS alone and CS AZA / oral CP/ AZA CP/ monthly
    IV CP.
  • CP better than CS alone
  • IV CP low dose prednisone better than high dose
    prednisone alone
  • AZA had an intermediate response, but no
    significant difference between AZA CS

23
Proliferative GN (2)
  • Intial high dose CS (prednisone 1mg/kg/day)
    pulse IV CP (750-1000 mg/m2 BSA).
  • pulse of CP is given at monthly interval x 6/12
  • then every 3/12 x two years.
  • CS gradually tapered
  • Alternative to high dose oral steroids
  • Pulse IV methylprednisolone, low dose oral
    prednisone (10-20 mg/day) to ?the incidence of
    steroid side-effects  
  • Initial IV methylprednisolone, 12 weeks oral CP (
    1-3 mg/kg/day) followed by combined AZA and CS

24
Proliferative GN (3)
  • Euro-Lupus regimen.
  • Induction limited course of low dose IV CP (6
    fortnightly pulses of 500 mg)
  • followed by a safer cytotoxic drug, AZA, as a
    long-term maintenance Rx
  • Data from the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial (ELNT)
    suggest that such a low cumulative dose of CP may
    achieve good clinical results, though important
    differences in patient populations between the
    ELNT and NIH studies, as well as in the dosing of
    CP, preclude extrapolation to other LN
    populations with different ethnic backgrounds or
    disease severity

25
Membranous GN
  • ? progression to ESRD
  • 20 in 10 yrs
  • Membranous GN with non nephrotic proteinuria
  • No Rx
  • Monitor progression

26
Membranous GN
  • Limited data on Rx
  • Rx follows that of idiopathic membranous
    nephritis
  • Steroids should not be used as sole therapy
  • AZA is not associated with any significant
    benefits
  • Alkylating agents, CP and chlorambucil - both
    effective
  • for patients with clinical features that predict
    a high likelihood of progression to ESRD, such as
    severe or prolonged nephrosis, renal
    insufficiency or HT
  • Cyclosporin
  • -if alkylating agents are contraindicated or
    ineffective
  • Limited experience suggests that most will
    experience a reduction in proteinuria.
  • Early results from an NIH study of membranous LN
  • prednisone alone vs prednisone CyA or CP
  • more favourable response to CP
  • frequency of relapse with CyA treatment may be
    significant

27
Newer forms of Rx
  • High dose immunoablative Rx
  • For refractory cases
  • CP, antithymocyte globulin methylprednisolone
    ? haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Long-term follow-up of reported cases
    randomized trials necessary
  • Biological approaches
  • Anti-CD40L and CTLA4Ig.
  • Results of murine studies are encouraging
  •  

28
Chronic renal failure
  • Nonimmune mechanisms
  • BP control
  • Low protein diet
  • Low salt
  • Calcium vitamin D
  • EPO
  • ? nephrotoxic drugs

29
Prognosis
  • 30 yrs ago
  • few pts with severe class IV nephritis survived
    1-2 yrs
  • ½ with less severe disease died within 5 yrs
  • Marked improvement in Rx
  • 10 15 progress to ESRF
  • Sepsis major cause of death
  • Transplant
  • recurrence rare
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com