Title: Lessons Learned From Chemical Accidents Reported to MARS
1Lessons Learned From Chemical Accidents Reported
to MARS
Institute for the Protection and Security of the
Citizen
The Use of HarsMeth As A Tool For Accident
Analysis
Jaime Sales, EC-JRC-MAHB
Ispra - 2 February 2007
2Analysis of Chemical Accidents
- Runaway reactions are known to be hazardous
(Seveso). - Generally unexpected lack of chemical
knowledge. - Possible consequences of process failures
underestimated Process analysis. - Hazards of chemical substances.
- Companies not always ready to cope with the
effects of loss of control of chemical reactions
Mitigation, response. - A selection of 132 accidents from MARS involving
chemical reactivity has been analysed. - Accidents involving chemical reactions.
- Accidents related to decomposition of unstable
substances or unexpected mixing of incompatible
substances.
3Consequences of chemical accidents (I)
- Chemical accidents can happen anywhere in a
chemical establishment. - Maintenance and cleaning accidents generate the
most serious consequences.
4Consequences of chemical accidents (II)
- Chemical accidents can happen anywhere in a
chemical establishment. - Maintenance and cleaning accidents generate the
most serious consequences.
5Main causes leading to chemical accidents (I)
6Main causes leading to chemical accidents (I)
7Lessons learned from Chemical Accidents
- Process analysis Process conditions (and
possible variations) must be studied in order to
identify hazards related to a process. - Stability of substances
- Compatibility of reactants
- Critical parameters for a reaction (dosing,
agitation, etc.). - Safety measures and control systems It must be
assured that any parameter identified as critical
for the safety of the process will always be kept
under safe conditions no matter what deviation
may occur (reliability, design). - Interlocks for chemical reactors (T-dosing,
T-cooling, Agitation-Dosing, etc.) - Pressure relief systems
- Organisational measures The development of a
safety management system is indispensable in
order to spread an appropriate safety culture in
a chemical establishment.
8HarsMeth What is it?
- Hazard Assessment of Highly Reactive Systems
Methodology. - Developed by EC funded network HarsNet
(1998-2002). Followed by Safety2Safety (S2S)
(2002-2006). - Currently under development by Institut Quimic de
Sarria, Ramon LLull University, Barcelona
(Spain). - Checklist based system to identify thermal
hazards of batch or semi-batch chemical reactions
for Small Medium Industrial Companies. - Available at
- http//www.harsnet.net http//www.s-2-s.org
9HarsMeth Structure
10Failure Scenario Diagram
Decomposition or secondary reactions triggered
Loss of process control
11Stoessel Diagram
12Objectives of Accident Analysis With HarsMeth
- To match accidental causes from MARS reports with
the issues covered by the methodology to enhance
accident analysis. - To identify how the use of HarsMeth could have
helped to avoid accidents. - To improve the methodology by identifying common
failure modes in chemical reactions by means of
lessons learned. - To provide recommendations for reporting of
chemical accidents.
13Safety Management Systems
- Related to routine operations Work permits
- Independent from process
14Preliminary Safety Analysis
- Substances and mixtures
- Usually related to storage and handling operations
15Bench Scale Analysis
- Critical parameters for the reaction
- Analysis of possible deviations from expected
process conditions
16Industrial Scale Analysis
- General recommendations in relation to previous
hazard identification - First action should be to try to eliminate the
hazard
17Conclusions
- Could accidents in MARS have been avoided with
the use of HarsMeth? - Identification of key issues to be reported to
MARS in case of chemical accidents - Study has clear benefit for the methodology as
testing exercise - Necessity to increase awareness of chemical
hazards (not only operators, but senior
management) - Dissemination of results to companies to improve
their safety culture
18Lessons Learned From Chemical Accidents Reported
to MARS
Institute for the Protection and Security of the
Citizen
The Use of HarsMeth As A Tool For Accident
Analysis
Jaime Sales, EC-JRC-MAHB
Ispra - 2 February 2007
19Lessons learned from Chemical Accidents Process
Analysis
- Identification of properties of the substances
involved in the process related to chemical or
physical stability, including safety margins for
temperature, humidity, storage time, etc. - Identification of incompatibility of the mixtures
that could be generated (intentionally or
unintentionally) in the chemical establishment.
Compatibility with auxiliary and construction
materials must also be studied. - Identification of those physical and chemical
parameters (temperature, pH, reaction time,
etc.), the variation of which could lead to a
loss of control of a chemical reaction or other
process operations. - Identification of possible actions (inhibition,
extra cooling, containment, etc.) that could be
taken in order to stop a runaway event. - Identification of possible physical consequences
(toxic release, explosion and/or fire) that could
be originated as a result of a runaway.
20Lessons learned from Chemical Accidents Safety
Measures and Control Systems (I)
- Whenever a hazardous substance has been
identified, it should be replaced, if possible,
with a less hazardous one, or at least its use
should be minimized. - For storage and transport, the control and
monitoring of critical parameters of unstable
substances must be made available. These may
include, among others, temperature and humidity
control, and verification of storage periods. - Measures must be introduced to ensure that
incompatible substances will not come into
contact at any stage of the process. - When using flammable materials, if their use
cannot be avoided, two conditions are of great
importance. - To avoid oxidant atmospheres that may trigger an
explosion, this can be achieved by the use of
inert gases like nitrogen. - To avoid ignition sources such as static
electricity, hot surfaces, or sparks originating
from other operations such as welding works.
21Lessons learned from Chemical Accidents Safety
Measures and Control Systems (II)
- For reaction and process operations, sensors to
monitor the evolution of critical safety
parameters identified during process analysis
should be incorporated into the plant equipment. - Sensors should be interlocked with the equipment
devices (such as cooling system, dosing devices,
agitation system, etc.), so that the control
system can act to restore appropriate process
conditions. - The correct functioning of the control system
must always be guaranteed, for this reason it
should be a policy to provide redundant control
systems. These must also be effective and
reliable when called upon. - If a loss of process control should happen, it
must always be possible to stop the activity.
Systems to kill a reactive process, such as
inhibitors, addition of solvent to quench a
reaction, or transfer of reaction mass to
catchment tanks should be provided.
22Lessons learned from Chemical Accidents Safety
Measures and Control Systems (III)
- The implementation of mitigation measures should
also be considered in case the risk analysis has
identified the potential for an accident to
occur, even if it is considered unlikely. Some
possibilities would include - Use of water curtains or foam sprays to dilute
toxic releases. - Relief valves or rupture disks or other devices
to deal with pressure increases in order to avoid
explosions - Fire containment and extinguishing systems.
- It must be guaranteed that, in case they should
be necessary, safety measures are always
effective and correctly designed. - It must be granted that supply lines such as
electrical power, cooling circuits, air, steam or
nitrogen feeds will always be operational.
23Lessons learned from Chemical Accidents
Organisational Measures
- Preparation of training systems is of primary
importance. Workers must be aware at any point of
the hazards involved in chemical processes. - Detailed maintenance and cleaning procedures must
be implemented. These have to take into account
the incompatibility of substances used for these
operations. - Emergency plan systems must include the
activation of defence systems, evacuation routes,
identification of personnel on site during an
accident, correct alarm systems, etc. - Appropriate operating procedures must be
provided, according to the process analysis.
After evaluating the hazards of a chemical
process, the appropriate methods to perform
common operations should be decided. Some
examples are - Implement correct labelling rules and procedures,
including verification, to avoid mishandling of
chemicals. - Provide description of requirements for safe
handling of chemicals for transport and loading
operations. This should include personal
protection measures and equipment (isolation,
connections, etc). - Ensure fluent communication throughout a process.
- Ensure appropriate supervision of hazardous
activities.
24(No Transcript)