Digital HCAL using GEM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Digital HCAL using GEM

Description:

Kapton etching most difficult step Work with Sauli's group. A. Sharma CERN OPEN-98-030 ... study with GEM. 15GeV. 5GeV. Nov. 7, 2002. Jae Yu: GEM Based DHCAL ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: andy279
Learn more at: http://www-hep.uta.edu
Category:
Tags: gem | hcal | digital | study | time | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Digital HCAL using GEM


1
Digital HCAL using GEM
  • J. Yu
  • Univ. of Texas at Arlington
  • Nov. 7 - 9, 2002
  • NICADD/NIU
  • Introduction
  • Digital Hadron Calorimeter Requirements
  • GEM in the sensitive gap
  • UTA GEM DHCAL Prototype Status
  • Simulation Status
  • Plans for Hardware, Simulation Algorithms
  • Summary

(on behalf of the UTA team A. Brandt, K. De, S.
Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee, A. White)
2
Introduction
  • LC physics topics
  • Distinguish W from Z in two jet final states ?
    Good jet mass resolution
  • Higher Jet energy resolution
  • Excellent jet angular resolution
  • Energy flow algorithm is one of the solutions
  • Replace charged track energy with momentum
    measured in the tracking system
  • Requires efficient removal of associated energy
    cluster
  • Higher calorimeter granularity
  • Use calorimeter only for neutral particle
    energies
  • Best known method for jet energy resolution
    improvement
  • Large number of readout channel will drive up the
    cost for analogue style energy measurement ?
    Digital HCAL
  • Tracking calorimeter with high gain sensitive gap

3
DHCAL General Requirements
  • Thin and sensitive readout layer for compact
    design
  • One or two level digital hit recording for EFA
    use
  • On-board amplification, digitization and
    discrimination for readout, minimizing noise and
    cross-talk
  • Flexible design for easy implementation of
    arbitrary cell size for upgrade
  • Minimal intrusion for crackless design
  • Ease of construction and maintenance
  • Cost effective

4
DHCAL Gas Amplification Requirements
  • Sufficiently large gain for good S/N ratio (3
    orders of magnitude smaller signal in gas
    compared to scintillation counter)
  • Minimize cross-talk between cells in readout
  • Isolated readout path from active volume to avoid
    coherent noise
  • Modularity, retaining continuity for gas and HV
    supplies and readout
  • Digitized readout from each cell
  • Allow pad design to avoid strip ambiguity
  • Keep low HV for safety and reliability
  • Simple readout electronics for cost savings and
    reliability

5
DHCAL Requirements for EFA
  • Small cell size for higher position resolution
    for good multiple track shower separation
  • High efficiency for MiPs in a cell for effective
    shower particle counting and MiP tracking
  • Possibility for Multiple thresholds
  • Dense and compact design for quick shower
    development to minimize confusion and resolution
    degradation
  • Large tracking radius with optimized magnetic
    field for sufficient separation between tracks
    for shower isolation

6
Goals for UTA DHCAL Development
  • Develop digital hadron calorimetry for use with
    EFA
  • Aim for cost effectiveness and high granularity
  • Look for a good tracking device for the sensitive
    gap
  • Develop GEM cell(s) and prototype
  • Develop module/stack design for EFA optimization
  • Simulate GEM behavior in calorimeter
  • Implement GEM readout structure into simulation
  • Develop EF and calorimeter tracking algorithms
  • Cost effective, large scale GEM DHCAL

7
Why GEM?
  • GEM developed by F. Sauli (CERN) for use as
    pre-amplification stage for MSGCs
  • Allow flexible and geometrical design, using
    printed circuit readout ? Can be as fine a
    readout as GEM tracking chamber!!
  • High gains, above 104,with spark probabilities
    per incident ? less than 10-10
  • Fast response
  • 40ns drift time for 3mm gap with ArCO2
  • Relative low HV
  • A few 100V per each GEM gap compared to 10-16kV
    for RPC
  • Rather reasonable cost
  • Foils are basically copper-clad kapton
  • 400 for a specially prepared and framed
    10cmx10cm foil

8
CERN-open-2000-344, A. Sharma
9
GEM Foils
  • Most foils made at CERN
  • A total of about 1000 foils made
  • COMPASS experiment has large scale, 31cmx31cm,
    GEM
  • Kapton etching most difficult step ? Work with
    Saulis group

A. Sharma CERN OPEN-98-030
10
GEM gains
CERN GDD group
11
Double GEM DHCAL Design
12
Double GEM test chamber
  • Sufficient space for foil manipulation
  • Readout feed-through, retaining large space for
    ease of connection
  • Clear cover to allow easy monitoring
  • Readout pads connection at the bottom

2cmx2cm pad design
J. Li, UTA
13
UTA GEM Test Chamber HV layout
Drift gap
HV fed from one supply but individually adjusted
? Good to prevent HV damage on the foils
2.1kV
Transfer gap
Induction gap
14
UTA GEM Prototype Status
  • Readout circuit board (2cmx2cm pads) constructed
  • HV Connection implemented
  • Two GEM foils in the UTA Nano fabrication
    facility cleanroom
  • Preamp in hand and characterization completed

Amplification factor of 300 for GEM size signal
(LeCroy HQV800 )
15
Single GEM gain/discharge probability
  • Simulation study in progress using multi-jet
    final states
  • Understand average total charge deposit in a cell
    of various sizes
  • Study fake signal from spiraling charged particle
    in the gap

A.Bressan et al, NIM A424, 321 (1998)
16
UTA Simulation Status
  • Two masters students have been working on this
    project
  • Mokka Geometry database downloaded and installed
    at UTA
  • Preliminary mixture GEM geometry implemented
  • Completed single pion studies using default
    geometry
  • Reproduced expected response
  • Energy resolution seems to be reasonable also
  • Root macro based and JAS based analysis packages
    developed
  • Proceed with more detailed GEM geometry
    implementation

17
Single Pion Studies w/ Default TESLA Geometry
  • 1000 single pion events using Mokka particle gun
    command.
  • Incident energy range 5 200GeV
  • kinematics information on primary particles in
    the files
  • Developed an analysis program to read total
    energies deposited per pion for each incident
    energy.
  • Mean Energy vs Incident pion energies
  • Energy conversion from the slope of the straight
    line
  • Conversion factor is 3.54 and agrees with the
    computed sampling fraction

18
TESLA TDR Geometry
  • Ecal Electromagnetic Calorimeter Material
    W/G10/Si/G10 plates (in yellow)
  • 1mm W absorber plates
  • 0.5 mm thick Si, embeded 2 G10 plates of 0.8 mm
    each
  • Hcal Hadronic Calorimeter
  • Material
  • 18 mm of Fe
  • 6.5 mm of Polystyrene scintillator (in green)

19
TESLA TDR detector live energy deposit for single
pions
20
TESLA TDR Elive vs Ep

21
TESLA TDR CAL Single Pion Resolution
22
GEM Simulation Status
  • Mokka Geometry database downloaded and installed
    at UTA
  • New Geometry driver written ? Mixture GEM
    geometry implemented ?Need to use ArCO2 only
  • Single pion study begun for discharge probability
  • Initial study shows that the number of electron,
    ion pair with gain of 104 will be on the order of
    107 for single 200GeV pions
  • Getting pretty close to the 108 from other
    studies ? Might get worse for jets from W pairs,
    due to fluctuation
  • Need more studies to compute the discharge
    probability.
  • Cell energy deposit being investigated to
    determine optimal threshold based on cell energy
    ? Proceed to energy resolution studies
  • Determine optimal gain using live energy deposit
    vs incident energy

23
GEM Prototype Geometry
24
GEM Geometry Implementation Mechanics in Mokka
  • TDR / Hcal02 Model chosen for modification
  • Fe-GEM sub-detector instead of the existing
    Fe-Scintillator
  • New driver for the HCal02 sub-detector module
  • Local database connectivity for HCal02 ? Database
    downloaded and implemented at UTA

Courtesy Paulo deFrietas
25
Single pion study with GEM
15GeV
5GeV
26
Cell Energy Deposit in GEM HCal
27
GEM Sampling Weight
28
Summary
  • Hardware prototype making significant progress
  • GEM foils delivered and are in the clean room for
    safe keeping
  • Preamp and Discriminator in hands ? Preamp
    characterized
  • HV System implemented
  • Readout Pad implemented
  • Almost ready to put GEM foils in the prototype
    box
  • GEM foil mass production being looked into by
    3MSimulation effort made a marked progress
  • Simulation effort made a marked progress
  • Single pion study of Mokka default TESLA TDR
    geometry complete
  • Analysis tools in place
  • The resolution seems to be reasonable
  • Preliminary GEM Mixture geometry implemented
  • First results seems to be a bit confusing
  • Initial estimate of eIon pair seems to be at
    about 107 for 200GeV pions
  • Local Geometry database implemented
  • Optimal threshold for digitization and gain will
    come soon
  • Will soon move onto realistic events, WW, ZZ, or
    tt ? jets
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com