Title: Digital HCAL using GEM
1Digital HCAL using GEM
- J. Yu
- Univ. of Texas at Arlington
- Nov. 7 - 9, 2002
- NICADD/NIU
- Introduction
- Digital Hadron Calorimeter Requirements
- GEM in the sensitive gap
- UTA GEM DHCAL Prototype Status
- Simulation Status
- Plans for Hardware, Simulation Algorithms
- Summary
(on behalf of the UTA team A. Brandt, K. De, S.
Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee, A. White)
2Introduction
- LC physics topics
- Distinguish W from Z in two jet final states ?
Good jet mass resolution - Higher Jet energy resolution
- Excellent jet angular resolution
- Energy flow algorithm is one of the solutions
- Replace charged track energy with momentum
measured in the tracking system - Requires efficient removal of associated energy
cluster - Higher calorimeter granularity
- Use calorimeter only for neutral particle
energies - Best known method for jet energy resolution
improvement - Large number of readout channel will drive up the
cost for analogue style energy measurement ?
Digital HCAL - Tracking calorimeter with high gain sensitive gap
3DHCAL General Requirements
- Thin and sensitive readout layer for compact
design - One or two level digital hit recording for EFA
use - On-board amplification, digitization and
discrimination for readout, minimizing noise and
cross-talk - Flexible design for easy implementation of
arbitrary cell size for upgrade - Minimal intrusion for crackless design
- Ease of construction and maintenance
- Cost effective
4DHCAL Gas Amplification Requirements
- Sufficiently large gain for good S/N ratio (3
orders of magnitude smaller signal in gas
compared to scintillation counter) - Minimize cross-talk between cells in readout
- Isolated readout path from active volume to avoid
coherent noise - Modularity, retaining continuity for gas and HV
supplies and readout - Digitized readout from each cell
- Allow pad design to avoid strip ambiguity
- Keep low HV for safety and reliability
- Simple readout electronics for cost savings and
reliability
5DHCAL Requirements for EFA
- Small cell size for higher position resolution
for good multiple track shower separation - High efficiency for MiPs in a cell for effective
shower particle counting and MiP tracking - Possibility for Multiple thresholds
- Dense and compact design for quick shower
development to minimize confusion and resolution
degradation - Large tracking radius with optimized magnetic
field for sufficient separation between tracks
for shower isolation
6Goals for UTA DHCAL Development
- Develop digital hadron calorimetry for use with
EFA - Aim for cost effectiveness and high granularity
- Look for a good tracking device for the sensitive
gap - Develop GEM cell(s) and prototype
- Develop module/stack design for EFA optimization
- Simulate GEM behavior in calorimeter
- Implement GEM readout structure into simulation
- Develop EF and calorimeter tracking algorithms
- Cost effective, large scale GEM DHCAL
7Why GEM?
- GEM developed by F. Sauli (CERN) for use as
pre-amplification stage for MSGCs - Allow flexible and geometrical design, using
printed circuit readout ? Can be as fine a
readout as GEM tracking chamber!! - High gains, above 104,with spark probabilities
per incident ? less than 10-10 - Fast response
- 40ns drift time for 3mm gap with ArCO2
- Relative low HV
- A few 100V per each GEM gap compared to 10-16kV
for RPC - Rather reasonable cost
- Foils are basically copper-clad kapton
- 400 for a specially prepared and framed
10cmx10cm foil
8CERN-open-2000-344, A. Sharma
9GEM Foils
- Most foils made at CERN
- A total of about 1000 foils made
- COMPASS experiment has large scale, 31cmx31cm,
GEM - Kapton etching most difficult step ? Work with
Saulis group
A. Sharma CERN OPEN-98-030
10GEM gains
CERN GDD group
11Double GEM DHCAL Design
12Double GEM test chamber
- Sufficient space for foil manipulation
- Readout feed-through, retaining large space for
ease of connection - Clear cover to allow easy monitoring
- Readout pads connection at the bottom
2cmx2cm pad design
J. Li, UTA
13UTA GEM Test Chamber HV layout
Drift gap
HV fed from one supply but individually adjusted
? Good to prevent HV damage on the foils
2.1kV
Transfer gap
Induction gap
14UTA GEM Prototype Status
- Readout circuit board (2cmx2cm pads) constructed
- HV Connection implemented
- Two GEM foils in the UTA Nano fabrication
facility cleanroom - Preamp in hand and characterization completed
Amplification factor of 300 for GEM size signal
(LeCroy HQV800 )
15Single GEM gain/discharge probability
- Simulation study in progress using multi-jet
final states - Understand average total charge deposit in a cell
of various sizes - Study fake signal from spiraling charged particle
in the gap
A.Bressan et al, NIM A424, 321 (1998)
16UTA Simulation Status
- Two masters students have been working on this
project - Mokka Geometry database downloaded and installed
at UTA - Preliminary mixture GEM geometry implemented
- Completed single pion studies using default
geometry - Reproduced expected response
- Energy resolution seems to be reasonable also
- Root macro based and JAS based analysis packages
developed - Proceed with more detailed GEM geometry
implementation
17Single Pion Studies w/ Default TESLA Geometry
- 1000 single pion events using Mokka particle gun
command. - Incident energy range 5 200GeV
- kinematics information on primary particles in
the files - Developed an analysis program to read total
energies deposited per pion for each incident
energy. - Mean Energy vs Incident pion energies
- Energy conversion from the slope of the straight
line - Conversion factor is 3.54 and agrees with the
computed sampling fraction
18TESLA TDR Geometry
- Ecal Electromagnetic Calorimeter Material
W/G10/Si/G10 plates (in yellow) - 1mm W absorber plates
- 0.5 mm thick Si, embeded 2 G10 plates of 0.8 mm
each
- Hcal Hadronic Calorimeter
- Material
- 18 mm of Fe
- 6.5 mm of Polystyrene scintillator (in green)
19TESLA TDR detector live energy deposit for single
pions
20TESLA TDR Elive vs Ep
21TESLA TDR CAL Single Pion Resolution
22GEM Simulation Status
- Mokka Geometry database downloaded and installed
at UTA - New Geometry driver written ? Mixture GEM
geometry implemented ?Need to use ArCO2 only - Single pion study begun for discharge probability
- Initial study shows that the number of electron,
ion pair with gain of 104 will be on the order of
107 for single 200GeV pions - Getting pretty close to the 108 from other
studies ? Might get worse for jets from W pairs,
due to fluctuation - Need more studies to compute the discharge
probability. - Cell energy deposit being investigated to
determine optimal threshold based on cell energy
? Proceed to energy resolution studies - Determine optimal gain using live energy deposit
vs incident energy
23GEM Prototype Geometry
24GEM Geometry Implementation Mechanics in Mokka
- TDR / Hcal02 Model chosen for modification
- Fe-GEM sub-detector instead of the existing
Fe-Scintillator - New driver for the HCal02 sub-detector module
- Local database connectivity for HCal02 ? Database
downloaded and implemented at UTA
Courtesy Paulo deFrietas
25Single pion study with GEM
15GeV
5GeV
26Cell Energy Deposit in GEM HCal
27GEM Sampling Weight
28Summary
- Hardware prototype making significant progress
- GEM foils delivered and are in the clean room for
safe keeping - Preamp and Discriminator in hands ? Preamp
characterized - HV System implemented
- Readout Pad implemented
- Almost ready to put GEM foils in the prototype
box - GEM foil mass production being looked into by
3MSimulation effort made a marked progress - Simulation effort made a marked progress
- Single pion study of Mokka default TESLA TDR
geometry complete - Analysis tools in place
- The resolution seems to be reasonable
- Preliminary GEM Mixture geometry implemented
- First results seems to be a bit confusing
- Initial estimate of eIon pair seems to be at
about 107 for 200GeV pions - Local Geometry database implemented
- Optimal threshold for digitization and gain will
come soon - Will soon move onto realistic events, WW, ZZ, or
tt ? jets