Title: Implementing ScientificallyBased Reading Instruction: From Theory to Practice
1ImplementingScientifically-Based Reading
Instruction From Theory to Practice
New Coaches Training September 23,
2008 Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education
2What is SBRR?
- the application of rigorous, systematic, and
objective procedures to obtain valid knowledge
relevant to reading development, reading
instruction, and reading difficulties
3Reading Objective
- With the help of many, Massachusetts will
achieve two important goals - Highly qualified teachers of reading in every K-3
school - All students reading at or above grade level by
the end of grade 3
4Presentation Objectives
- The Five Essential Components of Reading
- Donahue Institute Overview
- Assessment
- Needs-Based Instruction/Three-Tier Model
- Putting Theory to Practice
5The Need
- Approximately 40 of students across the nation
cannot read at a basic level - National Assessment of Educational Progress
- Reading proficiency in all content areas leads
directly to success in school and in life. - Children who cannot read are more likely to drop
out of school and are limited to lower paying
jobs throughout their lifetimes
6The Premise
Starting earlyKindergarten through Grade
Threeand applying comprehensive instruction
proven by scientifically-based reading research
(SBRR) is the best path to improving childrens
ability to read.
7Comprehensive Instruction
- Comprehensive instruction includes the five
components of reading - Phonemic awareness
- Phonics
- Fluency
- Vocabulary
- Comprehension
- Comprehensive instruction is direct, systematic,
explicit, and multi-sensory
8Phonemic Awareness
- In phonemic awareness instruction, students
learn to hear, identify, and manipulate phonemes,
the individual sounds that comprise spoken words.
9Phonemic Phonological Awareness
- Phonemic awareness
- e.g., identifying, categorizing, segmenting
blending phonemes in spoken words - Phonological awareness
- text-based rhyming sounds in the environment
- 20 hrs/year, lt 30 min/lesson, K/1 (core program)
- 1-2 skills at a time, in small groups
- Combine PA activities with letters
- See Adams et al, 1998. Phonemic awareness in
young children
10Phonics
- In phonics instruction,
- students learn the predictable sound-symbol
relationships between - phonemes, the individual speech sounds,
- and graphemes, the letters that represent speech
sounds in written English.
11Phonics Word Study
- Alphabet recognition
- Systematic explicit skills instruction in
letter-sound correspondences, K/1 emphasis - Practice reading connected text with high
percentages of learned correspondences - Integration of spelling phonics instruction
- Small groups 1-1 instruction
- Include decoding by analogy, structural analysis,
sight words, use of linguistic context - Integrate phonics spelling instruction
- See Beck, I.L. (2005). Making Sense of Phonics
12Phonics Two Approaches
- Skills Explicit Skills Embedded
- Direct instruction in Discovery of sounds
- sound-symbol within the context
- relationships of words and texts
- Practice blending Use of picture cues
- sounds in isolated and beginning letter
- words cues in decoding
- Practice reading Emphasis on
- words in decodable spelling/sound
- text patterns
- Includes High Emphasis on
- Frequency Word teachable moments
- Recognition and rather than skills
- Spelling sequence
13Spelling
- Spelling words as they sound enhances phonemic
awareness and letter knowledge and accelerates
the acquisition of conventional spelling - Snow, Burns Griffin, 1998
- Complementing regular opportunities for writing
with systematic spelling instruction enhances and
extends to both reading and writing growth
14Leveled Text
- Leveled Text serves as a bridge between decodable
text and the anthology or authentic literature. - Match leveled text to the childs vocabulary and
comprehension knowledge.
15Fluency
- In fluency instruction, students practice
reading connected text accurately, quickly, and
with appropriate expression. Fluent readers
automatically recognize printed words based on
orthography (spelling). Fluency is a bridge
between decoding and comprehension. - See Rasinski, T. (2003). The Fluent Reader
16Vocabulary Development
- Students develop knowledge about the meaning and
pronunciation of words necessary for oral and
written language communication and comprehension - Sufficient competence in spoken language is a
critical element of proficient reading - Integration of language development reading
skills is critical for all students, but
especially so for English learners
17Vocabulary/Language Development
- Phonological awareness predicted reading and
spelling better in the early grades. - Childrens language competence, including
vocabulary level, perfectly predicted classroom
reading achievement. - Reading, spelling, and writing are very dependent
on overall language proficiency. - Mehta, P. D., Foorman, B. R., Branum-Martin, L.
Taylor, W.P. (2005)Literacy as a undimensional
multilevel construct Validation, sources of
influence, and implications in a longitudinal
study in grades 1 to 4.(as cited in Glaser, D.
Moats, L.,2008) -
18Vocabulary Development
- Indirect reading vocabulary development through
wide reading, content area study, and writing - Repeated exposure to words in different contexts
- See Beck, McKeown, Kucan (2002). Bringing words
to life Robust vocabulary instruction.
- Build oral language vocabulary through
experiential learning, listening to books read
aloud, thematic units, and discussion - Direct instruction of reading vocabulary
learning word meanings through word study
dictionary use
19Comprehension
- In reading comprehension instruction, students
learn to use reading strategies for
understanding, remembering, and communicating
with others about the meaning of written text.
20Comprehension
- Daily access to engaging print materials
- Making Connections (self text world)
- Reciprocal teaching cooperative learning
- Coaching Targeted skills instruction for
individual student needs - Students have opportunities to practice using
strategies when reading fiction and informational
text - Use of writing to inform reading comprehension
- Explicit direct comprehension strategies
instruction utilizing modeling, explanation,
demonstration - Self-monitoring
- Asking answering questions
- Use of organizers (e.g., graphic)
- Predicting confirming
- Identifying expository narrative text structure
- Summarizing
- Guided practice in use of strategies when reading
connected text
21Assessments
- Administer valid, reliable assessments
- DIBELS
- - GRADE
- Additional Diagnostic Assessments
22Massachusetts Model for PD
- Reach important audiences
- School level
- Teachers, Reading Specialists, and Principals
- District level
- Superintendents and Curriculum Coordinators
- Community level
- Parents
- with right mix of theory and practice
23PD Delivery Mechanisms
- Statewide
- Advanced Seminars
- Regional Workshops
- Leadership Forums
- Network of PD providers
- Implementation Facilitators
- Reading Specialists
24The Roles
Federal Level
Third Parties
US DOE
MA ESE/Office of Literacy
State Level
IF
District Level
Superintendent
District Coordinator/Administrators
School Level
Principal
Reading Specialist/Coach
Literacy Team
Publishers
Union
Reading Instructors
SPED/Title I Instructors
Outside
Classroom Teachers
Consultants
Parents
Community
25The Network
26 SBRI 101
- Create open and safe environment
- Revisit until everyone can articulate
- Goals
- Educate
- Create one message
- Build a team
- Sustain
- Who is this for?
- Anyone and everyone who is working on K-3
literacy in schools
27Assessments
28Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
(DIBELS)
- How to use this assessment to inform small-group
instruction.
29- Initial Sound Fluency
- The examiner presents four pictures to the
child, names each picture, and then asks the
child to identify (point or say) the picture that
begins with the sound produced orally by the
examiner.
30- Letter Naming Fluency
- Students are presented with a page of upper and
lower case letters arranged in a random order and
are asked to name as many letters as they can
within one minute.
31- Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
- The examiner orally presents a word and asks the
student to produce verbally the individual
phonemes for each word.
32- Nonsense Word Fluency
- The student is presented with a page of randomly
ordered VC and CVC nonsense words (e.g. sig, rav,
ov) and asked to produce verbally the individual
letter sound of each letter or verbally produce,
or read, the whole nonsense word.
33- Oral Reading Fluency
- Three passages, which are calibrated for the
goal level of reading for each grade level, are
administered to the student and the student is
asked to read aloud for one minute from each
passage.
34Diagnosing Difficulty
- For your learners who need intensive or strategic
support, examine student booklets or student
probes. - Examine patterns of performance.
- Discuss instructional implications.
35Diagnosing Difficulty Common Pattern
- Low Initial Sounds
- Low PSF
- Low NWF
- Inconsistent first sound
- No Segmentation
- Initial Sounds Only segmentation
- Onset rime segmentation
- Does not know individual sounds
- Does not blend
36Instruction for Children Low in Initial Sounds
- Provide small-group or one-to-one instruction on
first sound isolation. - Use 2-picture choice activity.
- Proceed to 3 picture choice.
- Focus on only 1 new sound at a time.
- Include only pictures students know.
- Provide plenty of opportunities for children to
produce sound.
37Instruction for Children Low in PSF
- Begin with 2-3 phoneme words.
- Model sequential segmentation with fingers
(remember to move from left to right). - Select words beginning with continuous sounds.
- Provide multiple examples (3-4).
- Use a strip or set of connected boxes to
represent the sounds. Have children touch as you
say each sound. - Incorporate letters once children are firm on
segmentation.
38Instruction for Children Low in NWF
- Examine the sequence in which you introduce
letters. Select high-utility letters. - Provide instruction on a letter-sound for 3 days
minimum. - Do not introduce letter name at the same time for
children who are having difficulty. - Model how the sound is formed.
- Provide frequent, short practice opportunities
(e.g., partner flash cards). - Put known sounds in a fun review activity
(letters in a bag, letters on the chalk board
they erase). - Teach how to blend once 4-6 letters are firm.
39Instructional Suggestions
- Say it Slowly
- Say it Faster/Move it Closer
- Onsets and Rimes
- Playing with Sounds
- Tapping Out
- Tapping and Sweeping
- Teacher Reading Academy-2004
40Instruction for Children Who Have PSF and NWF but
are low on ORF
- Continue to introduce letter sounds children do
not know. - Teach students to recognize letter-sounds quickly
and efficiently (Aimone per second) - Examine NWF to determine whether they are
blending sounds into whole words. - Teach how to read whole words quickly.
- Teach how to read the whole word (sound it out
in your head).
41Instruction for Children Low ORF
- Check NWF score. Does child know adequate of
letter sounds to be blending words? (4-6). - Check probe. Is the problem accuracy or fluency?
Is the problem with selected vowels or all
vowels? - Can you detect an error pattern? Irregular
words, first-sound and guess reader? - Preteach sounding out strategy in word lists.
- Teach children how to sound out word in their
head. - Teach 1-2 critical irregular words (use a
spelling strategy instead of a sounding out
strategy). - Transition to short, decodable text.
- Provide multiple opportunities to read and reread
text. - Combine spelling word reading practice.
42Instruction for Children who Are Accurate but Not
Fluent
- Check ORF score. Does the child read with few
errors (five or fewer than five?) - Schedule fluency training for brief periods
daily. - 5-10 minute sessions of fluency practice.
- Preteach difficult words in passage.
- Select passage student can read with 90 accuracy
or higher. - Partner child with partner (parent, peer,
teacher, tape recorder) who can give feedback. - Set goals for of words read in 1 minute graph
performance. - Practice repeated reading with feedback.
- Continue teaching advanced word recognition
skills.
43What is the purpose of DIBELS Progress-monitoring?
The purpose of progress monitoring is to track
growth and inform instruction
44Guiding Questions
Are my students making effective progress toward
the goal?
Step 2
Is this an accurate perception of my students
growth in reading?
Step 3
What instructional components do I need to change
to point this student in the right direction
toward benchmark?
Step 4
How will I confirm that this change has had a
positive effect on this childs reading growth?
45Instructional Goals
- Establish an Instructional Goal for Alphabetic
Principle that will change odds of being a reader
Mid-year cutoff low risk
Nonsense Word Fluency
Mid-year cutoff at risk
Kaminski,Good Knutson, 2005
46 Evaluating and Modifying Instructional Support
- Key Decision for Progress Monitoring Assessment
- Is the intervention effective in improving the
childs early literacy skills? - How much instructional support is needed?
- Enough to get the child on trajectory for
Benchmark Goal. - When is increased support needed?
- Monitor childs progress during intervention by
comparing performance and progress to past
performance and the aimline. Three assessments
in a row below the aimline indicates a need to
increase instructional support.
Kaminski et al., 2005
47Evaluating Support Modify Intervention?
- Progress on Alphabetic Principle is not adequate
to achieve the goal with current intervention
Change.
Nonsense Word Fluency
Aim-Line for Adequate Progress
Kaminski et al., 2005
48Modify Intervention Increase Intensity
- Increase intensity of Alphabetic Principle
intervention and evaluate progress maintain
adequate progress with modifications
Mid-year cutoff low risk
Nonsense Word Fluency
Mid-year cutoff at risk
49GRADE
- Integrating
- GRADE and DIBELS
50GRADE in the early grades
- For K-1 Students
- What are the most reliable predictors and/or
skills required to become a fluent reader? - Phonological Awareness (Segmenting and Blending
with automaticity) - Rapid Naming of Letters
- Language
- Receptive and Expressive
- Verbal Concepts
51 Comprehension and Decoding
Caution Decoding Required!
Must Present ORF Benchmark for Maximum Benefit
52Interpreting GRADE Performance
Students with Total Test scores lt 5th Stanine
Are these students reading at Benchmark on DIBELS
ORF?
Yes
No
- Examine error rate on ORF
- Perform phonics screening
- Explicit, systematic phonics
- Practice reading using
- decodable texts
- -Build fluency with a variety of texts.
- Examine stanines for Vocabulary,
- Sentence and Passage Comprehension
- - Perform item analysis in these subtest areas to
determine specific skill areas to target for
instruction.
53Interpreting GRADE Performance
Students with Total Test scores higher than the
5th Stanine
Are these students reading at Benchmark on DIBELS
ORF?
Yes
No
- Provide opportunities for advanced comprehension
work in authentic informational and narrative
text.
- Continue to build fluency
- Provide opportunities to build comprehension
using the anthology, leveled readers and
authentic informational and narrative texts.
54GRADEA Few Key Points
- For ELLs
- If ORF score is near or at Benchmark ask
- How did the student perform on
- Listening Comprehension
- Word Reading
- Vocabulary
- Sentence and Passage Comprehension
55What Do I Do with these Data??
- Examine DIBELS and GRADE scores for your
students. - Decide how to group students effectively for
small group targeted instruction.
56Activity 1 Grouping Students for Instruction
- Pretend you are a student in this grade 2
classroom. - These are your Fall scores on DIBELS and GRADE.
- Decide if you are
- - a benchmark student needing core
instruction - - a student who needs strategic instruction
- - a student who needs intensive instruction
- Stand in the appropriate area of the triangle.
57Activity 1 Grouping and Instruction
- How proficient is your group of students?
- What are the specific skills/areas in need of
instructional attention for your group? - Is further assessment indicated by this
performance? - What can GRADE tell us about the vocabulary and
comprehension levels of this group? - What would be the next target of instruction for
your group?
58Three-Tier Model of Instruction
59Purpose of the 3-Tier Model
- Designed to meet the needs of ALL young readers
- Provide schools with a prevention model that is
aimed at catching students early before they
fall behind. - An alternative to the wait-until-they-fail model
60Overview of the 3-Tier Model Unequal
Resources for Unequal Needs
Layers of intervention responding to student needs
Tier I
Each tier provides more intensive and supportive
intervention
Tier II
Tier III
Aimed at preventing reading disabilities
61Flow of Implementation
621. Implement core program
- Structure the 90 minute block
- Use core materials to meet the needs of ALL
students
632-4. Assess/Identify/Group
- Assessments DIBELS, GRADE, other diagnostic
assessments - When Fall, Winter (DIBELS), Spring
- Who Assessment Team
- Reports TestWiz and Donahue Institute
- District, school, class, student level
64Data Meetings
655. Identify Scientifically-based
Programs/Resources/Materials
- Identify programs, resources and materials that
address the five components of reading - Supplemental/Intervention Programs, Resources and
Materials - Provide On-going training and coaching
666. Match Programs, Resources, Materials to
Student Needs
677-8. Identify Instructor/Allocate Time
- Make list of available instructors
- Identify training/experience
- Assign instructors to groups
- Schedule instructional periods based on
- Student needs
- Classroom and grade-level data
689-12. Goals/Implement/Monitor/Change
- Set realistic, measurable goals for all students
- Monitor integrity of program implementation
- Provide coaching and modeling to increase skilled
implementation of all programs - Meet regularly to evaluate progress monitoring
- Process to make instructional modifications
69Scripted Intervention Programs
- Explicit, intensive instruction is an essential
feature of effective interventions for struggling
readers, including students with learning
disabilities - National Reading Panel, 2000
70Needs-Based Groups
- Students with reading difficulties who are taught
in small groups learn more than students who are
instructed as a whole class - National Reading Panel, 2000
- Students benefit from working in a variety of
grouping formats that change to reflect their
knowledge, skills, interests, and progress -
- Elbaum et al., 2000
71Activity 2 Three Tier Model Case Studies
- Read your tables assigned sample student case
study. (5 minutes) - As a group, discuss what you would do next to
support the students progress. Be specific! Use
the accompanying questions on the handout to
guide your conversation. (15 minutes) - Debrief (5 minutes)
- Read the next section. Work with a partner to
create an action plan for accelerating that
students reading progress. (10 minutes) - Tables report out on their case studies
72With the Help of Many, Massachusetts Will Achieve
Two Important Goals
- All students reading at or above grade level by
the end of grade 3 - Highly qualified teachers of reading in every K-3
school.
73The greatest danger for most of us is not that
our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it
is too low and we reach it.
Michelangelo
74Resources
- Datametrics/Textwiz
- http//www.testwiz.net
- Florida Center for Reading www.fcrr.org
- Hanson Institute for Language and Literacy
- http//www.hill.mghihp.edu/hill
- University of Texas, Texas Education Agency
- http//www.tea.us.state.tx.us/ESC
-
- US DOE Leadership Academies
- www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading
75References
- Adams, M.J., Foorman, B.R., Lundberg, I.
Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic Awareness in Young
Children. Baltimore, MD Paul H. Brookes Co.
Inc. - Beck, I.L. (2005). Making Sense of Phonics. NY
Guilford Press. - Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Kucan, L. (2002).
Bringing words to life Robust vocabulary
instruction. New York, NY The Guilford Press. - Glaser, D., Moats, L. (2008). Foundations An
introduction to language and literacy.Boston, MA
Sopris West. -
- Kaminski, R.A., Good, R.H., Knutson, N. DIBELS
training institute Mentoring Workshop, November
2005, Williamstown, MA
76References
- MADOE, 31st Annual Title 1 Conference,
Hyannis, October - 2005. Creating An Assessment Framework To
Prevent - Reading Failure and Strengthen Instruction.
- NAEP (1995). 1994 Reading A First Look
Findings from the - National Assessment of Educational Progress
(Revised - Edition). Washington, DC U.S. Government
Printing Office - National Institutes for Child Health and
Human Development - (2000). Report of the National Reading
Panel Teaching Children to - read An evidence-based assessment of
scientific research literacy - on reading and its implications for reading
instruction. Washington, - DCU.S.Dept. of Education.
- Rasinski, T. V. (2003). The Fluent Reader. New
York Scholastic. -
-
77References
- Snow, C.E., Burns, S.M. Griffin, P. (1998).
Preventing Reading - Difficulties in Young Children.Washington,
DC National Academy - Press
- Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Watson Moody, S.
Elbaum, B. (2001). Instructional grouping for
reading for students with LD Implications for
practice. Intervention in school and clinic, 36,
3, 131-137. - Vaughn, S. (June, 2004). 3-Tier Reading Model
Reducing Reading - Difficulties from Kindergarten Through Third
Grade Students. - Presented at the Massachusetts Reading First
Leadership Meeting.
78Survey
- 3 things you learned today
- 2 things you want to know more about
- 1 thing you will take back with you today
- THANK YOU! ?