Vicarious Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Vicarious Learning

Description:

Boy shows fear or liking of Mickey Mouse toy over Donald Duck toy. Key pressing for M&Ms ... Mickey Mouse Toy. 21. Observation of Conditioning. No observation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:475
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: michaelr5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vicarious Learning


1
Chapter 8
  • Vicarious Learning

2
Vicarious Learning
  • Observational learning
  • Change in behaviour due to the experience of
    observing a model
  • Anecdotal evidence
  • Cats open cupboards, latches
  • Dog open gates

3
Early Work on Vicarious Learning
  • Thorndike
  • Puzzle box
  • Experienced model, naïve learner
  • Animals dont learn by observation
  • Many animals need to observe successes and
    failures

4
Not so simple
  • Some behaviours may LOOK like observational
    learning, but arent
  • Contagious Behaviour
  • Social Facilitation
  • Local/Stimulus Enhancement
  • Affordances
  • Mimicking/Imitation

5
Contagious Behaviour
  • Species-typical behaviour is released when others
    perform the behaviour
  • Test performance with model absent
  • Example
  • You may eat when youre already full if you are
    with others who are eating
  • Same with animals

6
Social Facilitation or Interference
  • Performance is changed based on the mere presence
    of others
  • Get better at easy, well-trained tasks
  • Get worse at difficult tasks
  • Before/After tests, baseline, control group
  • Example
  • Performing better at competitions, shows,
    tournaments
  • Slacking off at work
  • Zanjonc cockroaches in easy difficult mazes

7
Local or Stimulus Enhancement
  • Attraction to objects which others are using,
    then learn about object on own
  • Attraction to locations where others have been
  • Not learning from others, just attract attention
    to object
  • Two-Action Tests
  • Example
  • A chimp is attracted to a stick that another has
    discarded. The attraction allows for learning
    experiences with the stick.

8
Affordances
  • Actions of the model show the observer about the
    way the environment operates
  • Model is not strictly necessary
  • Two-Action with same affordance
  • Example
  • An observer watches a model push open a door and
    learns that the door swings outwards
  • Model not necessary, a string pulling the door
    open could result in same conclusion

9
Mimickry or Imitation
  • Copy-catting reproduction of observed
    behaviour
  • Doesnt necessarily show learning!
  • Outcome
  • Example
  • Dick Anne get to take a treat from one of two
    bowls
  • One bowl contains good candy, one has yucky candy
  • Dick reaches into the green bowl and gets the
    bad candy
  • If Anne reaches into the green bowl, she has
    imitated but not learned!

10
Human Infants Imitation
  • At what age can humans imitate?
  • Metzolff Moore (1977)
  • 12 to 21 day old infants
  • Facial gestures tongue protrusion, mouth open,
    lip protrusion

11
Experiment
  • Experimenter 90 sec passive face (baseline)
  • Infant shown gesture four times
  • Imitation-test period
  • Video taped and scored by blind judges
  • Supports imitation

12
(No Transcript)
13
Results
14
Infant Research
  • Replication difficult
  • Tongue protrusion elicited by other means
  • Infants attention general arousal?
  • Evolutionary advantage
  • Observing and copying behaviour of parents,
    siblings, etc. may bring more attention
  • Is it vicarious learning?

15
Generalized Imitation
  • Dont see the outcome of the models behaviour,
    but the observer imitates anyway
  • Prior experience with vicarious learning
  • We learn that imitating others behaviour may
    provide reinforcement
  • We generalize from one condition to another

16
Baer Sherman (1964)
  • Children observe puppet
  • Mouthing
  • Head nodding
  • Speaking nonsense
  • Lever presses
  • Imitation of first 3 behaviours reinforced
  • All 4 behaviours imitated
  • Stop reinforcement
  • All 4 behaviours decrease (extinguish)

17
Vicarious Classical Conditioning
  • Debate as to whether or not classical
    conditioning can be learned vicariously
  • Does an observers behaviour change due to the
    observation of the models behaviour?
  • Is the observer being directly classically
    conditioned when observing the model?

18
Haner Whitney (1960)
  • Model has finger on shock-device observer
    watches
  • Model removes finger when light is on
  • Record GSR of observer
  • Shock US
  • Models behaviour UR
  • Light CS
  • Increased GSR CR of anxiety

19
Bernal Berger (1976)
  • Observer watched video of eyeblink conditioning
    of model
  • Tone paired with airpuff
  • Recorded observers tendency to blink
  • Observers acquire eyeblink CR to tone

20
But...
  • In this study, could be higher-order classical
    conditioning
  • Seeing someone blink might be a CS for blinking
    yourself
  • Previously see people blink, if you blink you
    avoid aversive US
  • Tone could be CS2 to previously learned CS1

21
Venn Short (1973)
  • Baseline measure
  • Watch video
  • Boy shows fear or liking of Mickey Mouse toy over
    Donald Duck toy
  • Key pressing for MMs

22
Observation of Conditioning
  • No observation of CS-US pairing
  • i.e. toy never paired with US
  • Change in observers behaviour due to toy paired
    with reaction of model (fear or liking)
  • basic classical conditioning
  • not necessarily vicarious learning
  • Similar to prejudice where US was
    positive/negative words
  • US positive/negative reaction of model

23
Vicarious Operant Conditioning
  • Some evidence that operant conditioning can be
    acquired through vicarious learning
  • Important to distinguish from stimulus
    enhancement
  • Observe models reinforcement or punishment

24
Levy, McClinton, Rabinowitz Wolkin (1974)
  • Children observed model look at paired pictures,
    indicating preferences
  • Model received approval, disapproval, or neutral
    consequences
  • Observers subsequent preferences were for the
    pictures that the models received approval for
    selecting

25
Dorrance Zentall (2001)
  • Japanese quail
  • Models trained to peck or step on treadle
  • http//www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/zentall/defaul
    t.htm
  • Two-action method controls for stimulus/local
    enhancement
  • Treadle always gets pressed down, so affordances
    are the same

26
Methods
  • Observers watched one model either peck at or
    step on treadle
  • Later tested in absence of model
  • Not contagious behaviour or social facilitation

27
Variables affecting Vicarious Learning
28
Characteristics of the Model
  • Authority
  • Dominance
  • Similarity
  • Sincerity
  • Attractiveness
  • Venus Effect

29
Characteristics of the Learner
  • Uncertainty
  • Sex
  • Age

30
Characteristics of the Situation
  • Task uncertainty
  • Task difficulty
  • Presentation of model

31
Theories
32
Banduras Studies
  • Bobo the Clown experiments
  • Children as observers
  • Watched various models demonstrating behaviours
  • Consequences of models behaviour
  • Availability of reward

33
(No Transcript)
34
Banduras Social Cognitive Theory
  • Attentional processes
  • Retentional processes
  • Motor reproductive processes
  • Incentive and motivational processes

35
Miller-Dollard Reinforcement Theory
  • Vicarious learning as a variant of operant
    conditioning
  • Observers behaviour changes due to consequences
    of observers behaviour
  • Three steps
  • 1. Learner observes behaviour of model
  • 2. Learner copies response
  • 3. Learner receives reinforcement

36
Possible Problems
  • Absence of model
  • Latent learning
  • Delays in behaviour common
  • Lack of reinforcement
  • Generalized imitation

37
Comparison
  • Banduras theory
  • Innate processes, learning, and cognition
  • Future expectations
  • Reinforcement theory
  • Behavioural operant conditioning
  • Past experiences

38
Applications
39
Foraging
  • Birds opening milk containers, pecking through
    creamers
  • Stimulus enhancement?
  • Foraging locations
  • Local enhancement?

40
Television Violence
  • National Television Violence Study (1998)
  • 8000 hours of programming
  • 7 days/week, 6AM-11PM for 3 years
  • 60 of programs contained violence
  • Less than 4 contained anti-violence message
  • By age 12, average child has seen 8,000 murders
    and over 100,000 other acts of violence on TV

41
Bandura et al (1963)
  • 5 minute video of Rocky Johnny
  • Johnny plays with toys
  • Rocky asks to share, but Johnny says no
  • Rocky beats Johnny up
  • Rocky plays with toys
  • Rocky puts all the toys in a sack and takes them
    home
  • Watched how often children played aggressively
    (hit Bobo doll)
  • One little girl asked for a sack

42
In real life
  • Causal or Correlational
  • Correlation does not show causation
  • 3rd factor?

43
Developing Phobias
  • Vicarious acquisition
  • Prevalence in humans?

44
Treatment of Phobias
  • Flooding
  • Systematic desensitization
  • Relaxation and shaping

45
Modeling Treatments
  • Modeling
  • Used with the very young
  • Sometimes more rapid
  • May be better at generalization
  • Three types of phobia reduction modeling
  • 1. Graduated modeling
  • 2. Symbolic modeling
  • 3. Participant modeling
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com