Title: Northwest AIRQUEST 12406
1Northwest AIRQUEST12/4/06
- Cliff Mass
- University of Washington
2Topics
- PBL Parameterizations
- The Current and Future State of the System
- The Data Assimilation Revolution
3Boundary Layer Parameterizations
- It is now recognized both locally and nationally
that the boundary layer parameterizations in
current mesoscale models (e.g., WRF, MM5) have
substantial weaknesses when run at typical
resolutions of 4-15 km horizontal grid spacing. - These problems are most profound for stable
boundary conditions, which are unfortunately
important for the air quality community.
Example, maintaining a shallow (few hundred meter
thick cold layer near the surface). - Another issue is what type of parameterization is
appropriate for grid spacings below 1 or 2-km,
where we start to explicitly model large BL
circulations
4Shallow FogNov 19, 2005
- Held in at low levels for days
- MM5 could produce and maintain the inversionbut
generally without the shallow mixed layer of cold
air a few hundred m deep - MM5 could not maintain the moisture at low levels
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Where are the problems?
- PBL parameterizations themselves?
- Land surface models or surface specifications?
- Model dynamical cores (too much diffusion, etc)?
- Other physics (such as radiation?)
12Who is working on PBL parameterizations and
evaluating current ones?
- Generally a hollowing out of the U.S. efforts
(e.g., UW Energy Transfer Group) - For MM5/WRF mainly Korean effort (Yonsei
University) - Still activity in Europemainly Dutch?
- Eric Grimits activities and Chris Brethertons
group - No one at NCEP actively working on PBL
parameterizations for mesoscale models.
13Important Note
- At the WRF annual workshop at NCAR, PBL was
recognized as number one physics problem. - I chaired the Physics working group and several
individuals wanted to organize a PBL effort.
14Eric Grimit Research Before Leaving
- He generated two months of output
(November-December 2005) using 3 model
configurations in WRF - Default WRF with YSU-PBL
- YSU-PBL with Garratt SL
- UW-PBL with Garratt SL
- Note YSU is Yonsei PBL Schemean improved
version of the current MRF scheme - Did initial comparison/verification using tower
data at Hanford. - Some encouraging results.
15- the average theta difference from the surface
value (2-m actually) at 12 Z for each
configuration from the model column closest to
Hanford, WA
16Where do we go from here?
- Chris Bretherton is now supervising the further
analysis by an undergraduate student (Alfredo
Arroyo) of these comparison runs. - Eric Grimit has left for 3-tier, but would like
to continue working on the problem at some
(small) level. - Chris is willing to lead a renewed PBL effort if
there was some hope of funding. - There was a meeting last January at Hanford to
talk about a regional boundary layer initiative.
17The NW has many of the pieces
- Considerable intellectual resources in NW (UW,
WSU) - Real-time modeling system infrastructure
- Substantial observational assets (e.g. PNNL and
wonderful mesoscale network) - Engaged user community (e.g., NW modeling
consortium) - Active partners north of the border
- Developing regional data assimilation system that
could be a major tool.
18Computer forecast models were nearly perfect for
the onset and amount of snow over Puget Sound.
The Missing Element Leadership and around
Portland. and we know why.
19Current State of the System
20High-Resolution Forecasts
- MM5-GFS 36, 12 and 4-km runs have been highly
stable without any significant down times. - The MM5-NAM 36-12 km has been moved from the old
Tahoma to Linux machines..earlier availability - Did very well for both the snow storm and
flooding events. - Grid-based bias correction for temperature and
dew point are now online.
21The Switch to WRF
- Testing the current version of WRF and some
components of the new system. - MM5 is verifying better still.
22WRF
- Waiting on new version of WRF with nudging and
better radiation schemes. - Will evaluate for an extended period. If equal
or superior will switch..after the consortium
provides approval. Probable switch..next summer.
23Ensemble Probabilistic Prediction
- Our 36-12 km mesoscale ensemble system is highly
stable. - Running on new Linux processors and includes
extended physics ensemble. - Substantial effort is going into development of
post processing (bias correction and Bayesian
model averaging)--which greatly enhances the
probabilistic skill. - The ensembles and many products are online.
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26The New Revolution Mesoscale Analysis using
Ensemble Techniques
- New mesoscale data assimilation approaches based
on ensembles should allow great improvement in
using all observational assets to produce a
highly realistic 3D description of the regional
atmosphere. - Will be a boon for weather and air quality
prediction, both for verification and for
initializing our models. - Will allow us to get the most out of the rapidly
increasing number of surface observations and
aircraft reports. - We are building the system right now at the UW to
do it.
27How it works
- You have a collection of ensemble members, each a
little different. - You can correlate an observed parameter with 3D
atmospheric structures produced by the model. - Example for the current synoptic/mesoscale
configurationmore precip at Sea Tac would be
associated with more convergence in wind field - Using the model as a key part of the data
assimilation cycle.
28The Start
- We have purchased and installed a new clusterthe
AOR clusterto be the computational resources (13
nodes with 4 processors each) - Have purchased a new RAID array to serve it.
- Have hired a very good post-doc..Brian Ancelto
do the workand he has begun to build the system. - This will be the highest resolution attempt to do
this in the country. - Based on our successful coarse (45 km) resolution
system. - Probably 60- 90 members.
29The Impact
- If this works, we will have extraordinarily high
quality mesoscale analyses suitable for air
quality and NWS needs - If will produce high quality forecasts and will
greatly enhance the 0-12 hr forecasts of the
real-time system. Maybe much longer in some
cases. - Can overcome some of the PBL problems by pushing
the model hard with observational assets.
30NewAOR Cluster