Title: Landmines and Cluster Bombs: An Enduring Problem
1Landmines and Cluster BombsAn Enduring Problem
2Brief History of Landmines
- 14th century Chinese text, the Huolongjing,
describes a mine made of bamboo, black powder,
and lead pellets. It was placed underground. - Detonated by a flint device that directed sparks
onto a series of fuses
3Brief History of Landmines
- In 1500s, fougasse mines were developed.
- Buried explosives, covered with rocks or metal
- Detonated by tripwires or by long fuses
- High maintenance, and due to susceptibility of
black powder to dampness.
4Brief History of Landmines
- First modern, mechanically detonated
anti-personnel mines created by Confederate
troops under Brigadier General Gabriel Raines - Raines had begun working with explosive booby
traps in the Seminole Wars in Florida in 1849 - Used more reliable and reproducible mechanical
detonation devices
5Brief History of Landmines
- Improved mines were designed in Imperial Germany
around 1912 - Designs were copied and manufactured by all major
participants in the First World War
6Brief History of Landmines
- Antipersonnel mines were first used on a large
scale in WWII - Initially used to protect antitank mines, to stop
them from being removed by enemy soldiers - Later antipersonnel mines used to slow or halt
enemy movement, by being placed in great numbers
7Design
- Triggered by a variety of means (pressure,
vibration, movement, magnetism) - Many have an additional touch or tilt trigger, to
prevent enemy engineers from defusing it.
8Design
- Use as little metal as possible, to make location
by metal detectors more difficult. - Mines made mostly from plastic are also very
cheap to produce
9Design
- Wide variety of designs
- Makes detection and disarming very difficult
10Design
11Design
12Design
- Claymores
- Stake mines
- Bounding fragmentation mines
13Design
- Often deliberately designed to maim, rather than
kill - Stabilizing and evacuating an injured soldier
hampers an actively fighting force - More resources are taking up by caring for an
injured solder than dealing with a dead soldier - Cheap and easy to make, around 1 each
- (can cost more than 1000 to find and destroy)
14Marking minefields
- Ideally, minefields laid by armies should be well
marked, to prevent friendly troops from entering - All mines locations should be recorded, since
warning signs can be removed or destroyed, and so
safe routes through the mine fields can be
followed by friendly soldiers
15Unreliable marking
- In the fog of war protocols are not always
accurately followed - New landmines designed to be scattered by
helicopter, plane, by artillery, or ejected from
cruise missiles, make precise recording
impossible - (US air deployed mines have a self-deactivating
design, but reliability is uncertain)
16Deliberately unmarked fields
- Non-state armies (rebel groups, guerilla
fighters) do not reliably uphold these
conventions - Often, their goal is to spread fear and panic in
the community, and deliberately terrorize
civilians. So mined areas are deliberately not
marked - Such tactics were regularly employed in the
Southern African conflicts throughout the 70s
and 80s - Angola, Mozambique, Nambia, South Africa,
Zimbabwe, are still plagued with landmines as a
result.
17Landmines are indiscriminate
- The vast majority of victims are civilians, not
soldiers. - According to the Landmine Monitor Report 2003,
only 15 of reported casualties were military
personnel
18Mines remain after conflict ends
- Most of the countries where casualties are
reported are at peace - In 2002-2003, 41 of the 65 countries that
reported new mine casualties were not
experiencing any armed conflict - Landmines placed during WWI sometimes still cause
deaths in parts of Europe and North Africa
19Long term costs to survivors
- Permanent disability is almost certain
- A growing child needs a prosthetic limb
frequently refitted each year, and few can afford
this - Many face social exclusion, such as being seen as
unfit to marry - Some children never return to school after their
accident
20Long term costs to survivors
- A death might cost a family their primary
breadwinner - For survivors, vocational training and support is
often unavailable - Many struggle to make a living after their
accident, and become a burden on their families - Victims often end up begging on the streets
21Mines hamper recovery after conflict ends
- People in some of the poorest countries are
deprived of their productive land and
infrastructure - Farm lands, orchards, irrigation canals, and
wells may no longer be accessible - Mines cut off access to economically important
areas, such as roads, dams, and electricity
towers
22Mines hamper recovery after conflict ends
- Landmines slow repatriation of refugees after a
conflict ceases, or prevent it altogether - They hamper the delivery of relief services, and
injure or kill aid workers
23Widespread problem
- More than 75 countries are affected by
undetonated mines - Some of the most contaminated places
- Afghanistan, Angola, Burundi, Bosnia
Herzegovina, Cambodia, Chechnya, Colombia, Iraq,
Nepal, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, India, and Pakistan
24Widespread problem
- Nobody knows how many mines are still in the
ground worldwide - The actual number is less important than their
impact - It can only take a few mines, or just the
suspicion of their presence, to make an area
unusable
25Treaties
- Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
- AKA Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions
on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which
May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to
Have Indiscriminate Effects - AKA The CCW
- Was an amendment to the Geneva Conventions of
1949 - Concluded in Geneva on October 1980, went in to
force in December 1983 - Amended again in 1996
26CCW
- Consisted of 5 protocols
- Protocol II concerns Prohibitions or
Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps,
and Other Devices - Prohibits the use of non-self-destructing or
non-self-deactivating mines outside fenced,
monitored, and marked areas
27CCW
- Unfortunately, CCW lacked specific mechanisms to
ensure verification and enforcement of
compliance, and had no formal process for
resolving disputes about compliance. - The US only signed 2 of the 5 protocols, the
minimum required to be considered a signatory
28Continue Toll
- NGOs continued to see toll mines took in the
various communities they had been working in, in
Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America - They knew only a complete ban would adequately
address the problem
29The ICBL
- The International Campaign to Ban Land Mines
(ICBL) was launched in 1992 - Formed from 6 NGOs (Handicap International, Human
Rights Watch, Medico International, Mines
Advisory Group, Physicians for Human Rights, and
Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation) - Lobbied governments and rallied public support
for a complete ban
30Celebrity Support
- The late Princess Diana focused attention on the
problem of landmines, and the need for a ban - Visited Angola and Bosnia with mine clearing
organizations, and focused the media spotlight on
the victims - Her work brought increased public support and
pressure on governments to sign the treaty
31The Mine Ban Treaty
- The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use,
Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of
Anti-Personnel Mines and Their Destruction - AKA The Mine Ban Treaty
- Signed by 122 governments in Ottawa, Canada in
December 1997
32The Requirements
- Signatories must stop production and deployment
of anti-personnel mines - They must destroy all anti-personnel mines in its
possession within 4 years - (A small number of mines may remain for purposes
of training mine detection and clearance) - Within 10 years, the country should have cleared
all of its mined areas - Mine affected countries are eligible for
international assistance for mine clearance and
victim assistance once they sign the Mine Ban
Treaty
33Signatories to the Treaty
- As of August 2007, 155 State Parties had signed
- Only 40 states remain outside the treaty
- Notable exclusions
- China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Libya, Pakistan,
Russia, Syria, and United States
34US Refusal to Sign
- The US refuses to sign the treaty because it does
not offer a Korean exception - Argues landmines are crucial to its strategy in
South Korea - One million mines along the DMZ between North and
South Korea - Believes it maintains a delicate peace by
deterring a North Korean attack
35US Contribution to the Problem
- U.S. used antipersonnel mines in Vietnam, Korea,
and first Gulf War - From 1969-1992, U.S. exported over 5 million
antipersonnel mines to over 30 countries - Those include Afghanistan, Angola, Cambodia,
Iraq, Laos, Lebanon, Mozambique, Nicaragua,
Rwanda, Somalia, and Vietnam - U.S. made mines have been found in at least 28 of
these mine affected countries or regions
36Worldwide Recognition
- The coordinator of the International Campaign to
Ban Landmines, Jody Williams, won the 1997 Nobel
Peace Prize for her work
37Current Status
- Landmines continue to pose a threat to citizens
- The most landmine affected countries are
Afghanistan, Angola, and Cambodia - The middle east has been called the landmine
heartland, with tens of millions of buried
landmines
38Current Status
- Every 28 minutes, someone steps on a landmine
- Landmines are estimated to kill or injure
approximately 18,000 people every year
39Continued Mine Use
- Only 2 states continue to deploy new mines
-
- Myanmars military forces continue to use
antipersonnel mines extensively - Russia continues to use mines, primarily in
Chechnya, but also in Dagestan and on the borders
of Tajikistan and Georgia
40Continued Mine Use
- Israel may have laid antipersonnel mines in the
2006 conflict with South Lebanon - Russian peacekeepers claim Georgian military
forces laid new landmines, despite its moratorium
on landmine use
41Cessation of Use
- Nepal, with its cease-fire in 2006
- Angola, since the April 2002 peace agreement
- Sri Lanka, since the cease-fire in 2001
- Rebel use has stopped in Angola, Sri Lanka,
Macedonia, Senegal, and Uganda
42The Bad News
- 13 countries still produce or retain the right to
produce antipersonnel mines - Forty countries outside the Mine Ban Treaty
together possess 160 million antipersonnel mines
43New Production
- The ICBL identified the following countries as
manufacturing landmines as of August 2004 - Singapore
- Vietnam
- Burma
- Nepal
- India
- Pakistan
- Russia
- Cuba
- Iran
- North Korea
- United States
44US Production
- US has failed to adopt sign the Mine Ban Treaty,
or adopt an official moratorium - Since US stockpiles are at capacity, there had
not been any US based production of antipersonnel
mines since 1997
45Bush Administration Policy
- February 2004, President Bush announced his
landmine policy - No intention of joining the Mine Ban Treaty
- Continued development and production of
antipersonnel mines - (although self-destructing/deactivating)
46Companies Producing Mines
- In the US, no company produces mines from
beginning to end - Companies only produce component parts, which are
assembled in government-owned, contractor
operated army ammunition plants
47Companies Producing Mines
- Seventeen US companies, formerly involved in
producing antipersonnel mines, declined to
renounce future production - AAI Corp
- Allen-Bradley
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
- Accudyne Corp
- Ferrulmatic, Inc.
- CAPCO, Inc.
- Dale Electronics, Inc.
- Ensign-Bickford Industries, Inc.
- General Electric
- Lockheed Martin Corp.
- Mohawk Electrical Systems, Inc.
- Nomura Enterprise, Inc.
- Parlex Corp.
- Quantic Industries, Inc.
- Raytheon
- Thiokol Corp.
- Vishay Sprague
48New US Production
- In July 2006, Pentagon announced it had awarded
contracts to two companies or the development of
a new landmine system - (Alliant Techsystems, and Textron Systems)
- Called the Spider
- Deploys triplines, that can be activated remotely
by a monitoring soldier - May also be activated by the victim (as in a
conventional mine)
49New US Production
- Congress stalled the production by requiring the
Pentagon to first study the possible
indiscriminate consequences of deploying this
weapon. - The issue is only delayed until the study is
submitted to Congress
50Removing Mines
- Even after production is halted, mines must be
removed from the ground
51Removing Mines
- Mechanical Devices
- Mine flails may only be 80 effective (good
enough for military use)
52Removing Mines
- For Humanitarian De-mining, UN sets a standard
of 99.6 removal - Communities must feel safe returning to their
lives - Most mines must be detected and
removed/deactivated by hand
53Removing Mines
- Humanitarian De-miners first try to restore
access to productive land and vital
infrastructure - For example clearing a path to a water source,
or a village school
54Removing Mines
- De-mining by hand is time consuming, labor
intensive, and dangerous - Mines are rarely placed in flat, open fields
- Terrain is often rocky and steep
55Removing Mines
- Proper protective equipment is expensive
56Removing Mines
- Some countries can not afford such protective
equipment
57Possible New Methods
- Gambian Giant Pouched Rat
- Can be trained with food rewards to find certain
odors - Too small to set off the mines
58Possible New Methods
- Honey bees
- May be trained to detect chemical odors from mines
59Possible New Methods
- The mustard Arabidopsis thaliana normally turns
red under harsh conditions - Scientists have bred a strain that turns red in
response to the nitrous oxide that leaks from
landmines and other explosives
60Possible New Methods
- A bacterium has been genetically engineered that
will fluoresce under UV light in the presence of
TNT - Could be sprayed over an entire field to detect
mines
61Some Good News
- Since the Mine Ban Treaty
- World-wide production has fallen considerably
- Trade has almost come to a halt
62Some Good News
- In 2006, over 450 square km of mined land was
cleared and put back into productive use
63Some Good News
- Mine risk education reached 7.3 million people,
to protect them from the danger of mines
64Some Good News
- Since the treaty, there has been widespread
destruction of stockpiled mines
65What You Can Do
- Support organizations that aid countries in
clearing mined fields, providing assistance to
victims, and lobby for continued government
action against landmines - Volunteer time and money
66What You Can Do
- HALO (Hazardous Area Life-Support Organization)
- A British and American NPO whose purpose is to
remove landmines and unexploded ordinance left
behind after a war - Operates in 9 countries, and has over 7000
mine-clearers - Largest operation is in Afghanistan
- Has removed 30,000 mines in Angola since the end
of their war in 1994
67What You Can Do
- Clear Path International
- Assists the civilian victims of landmines and
other explosive remnants of war - Supports prosthetic clinics
- Delivers prostheses to remote areas far from
medical care
68What You Can Do
- Adopt-A-Minefield Campaign
- Works primarily through the UN to clear mine
fields in some of the most heavily mined
countries in the world - Works with a number of organizations to provide
relief to landmine survivors - Cleared over 21 million square meters of land in
Afghanistan, Angola, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam - Provided over 1.5 million for survivor
assistance projects
69What You Can Do
- Marshall Legacy Institute
- Contributors can sponsor a mine-detection dog
70What you can do
- Support the International Campaign to Ban
Landmines - Challenge elected officials (and candidates) to
sign the Mine Ban Treaty
71Cluster Bombs
72Cluster Bomb Design
- Air dropped or ground launched munitions that
eject a number of smaller munitions (bomblets) - Variety of designs
- Variety of types of bomblets
- Anti-personnel
- Incendiary
- Anti-tank
- Anti-runway
- Anti-electrical
73Cluster Bomb Design
- Depending on the type and size of cluster bomb, a
single munition may contain over 2000 bomblets
74Large Strike Area
- Bomblets are scattered over a very wide area
- The area hit by a single cluster munition can be
as large as 2 or 3 football fields. - With such a wide area, civilians are frequently
hit inadvertently
75Unexploded Ordinance
- Not all bomblets detonate on impact
- They remain live, and can explode if handled
- Essentially act as landmines
76Intrinsic Failure Rate
- For example
- U.S. made M26 warheads with M77 submunitions are
designed to have a 5 dud rate - In reality, they have a dud rate closer to 16
- M483A1 DPICM artillery delivered cluster bombs
have a reported dud rate of 14
77Small Failures Add Up
- Given that each cluster bomb contains hundreds of
bomblets, and are fired in volleys - even a small failure rate can lead to hundreds
or thousands of unexploded ordinances scattered
about
78Continue to be a Danger
- Like landmines, they may still be live and deadly
even many years after deployed
79Unintended Deadliness
- Some cluster bomblets are brightly colored to
increase their visibility and warn off civilians - However, the color, combined with their small and
non-threatening appearance, cause children to
interpret them as toys
80Tragic Oversight
- In the War in Afghanistan, humanitarian rations
dropped from airplanes were in similar yellow
colored packaging as undetonated BLU-97B bomblets - After several deaths, the humanitarian packages
were changed to blue, then to transparent, to try
to avoid such confusion
81Ongoing Deaths
- In Vietnam, people are still being killed from
cluster bombs dropped by U.S. and Vietnamese
forces up to 300 every year - Unexploded cluster bombs kill more civilians in
post-war Kosovo than landmines - Citizens in Lebanon are being injured and killed
by unxploded bomblets left from the 2006 conflict
with Irseal - Cluster bomblets kill and maim civilians in Iraq
and Afghanistan as we try to gain local support
82CCW
- Protocol V of the UN Convention on Certain
Conventional Weapons covers explosive remnants
of war - Sometimes applied to the topic of cluster
munitions - Has little power to enforce, and the primary
users of cluster weapons are not signatories
83Cluster Munitions Coalition
- Following failure of the CCW review in 2006 to
effectively address the humanitarian crisis of
cluster munitions, CMC begun - A network of more than 200 NGOs, faith-based
groups, and professional organizations - Includes global organizations, such as Handicap
International, International Campaign to Ban
Landmines, and Human Rights Watch
84The Oslo Process
- Through the CMC, the Norwegian Government, along
with Austria, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand, and
Peru, announced its intention to establish a new
international process to establish a treaty
banning cluster bombs - Will also increase clearance of contaminated
land, and provide assistance to victims - In Feb 2007, 46 nations met in Oslo, committed
themselves to completing this treaty by 2008, and
began to shape the document - As of November 2007, 84 states were participating
in the Oslo Process
85Taking an Example from the Mine Ban Treaty
- CMC is calling on governments to make a strong
and comprehensive treaty, that will make a real
difference in peoples lives, without exceptions,
delays, or loopholes - Government must publicly endorse the previous
draft in order to participate in the next
conference - Despite not being a superpower, smaller countries
are taking decisive steps, and not waiting for
larger countries to come around
86Global Day of Action
- The Global Day of Action to Ban Cluster Bombs
- April 19, 2008
- Occurs one month before the Dublin Diplomatic
Conference on Cluster Munitions (May 19-30, 2008)
87What You Can Do
- Get involved!
- CMC gives advice on organizing events to
demonstrate public support, raise awareness, and
pressure governments to ban cluster munitions
88What You Can Do
- Question candidates about their position on
cluster munitions - A September 6, 2006, the Senate amendment to ban
the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas was
voted on - Senator Clinton voted no
- Senator Obama voted yes
89Questions?