Giorgio Apollinari

1

• Giorgio Apollinari
• FNAL
• Endcap Muon MO L2 Manager
• CMS - MO Scrutiny Review
• April 8-10, 2003

2
Outline

• Introduction
• MO Phase Description and Management Structure
• Scope and Deliverables of MO Phase
• Major Milestones
• MO Phase Planning
• Activities
• Manpower Resources
• MS Resources
• WBS
• Line-by-line Scrutiny

3
MO Phase General Scope

• Commission CSCs, FEE Peripheral Electronics
• Define Project Completion
• Full Installation up to and including
  connectivity tests
• Operate CSCs, FEE Crates as HEP Detector
• Gas, Cooling Water (CSCs Crates), HV, LV, .
• Read out EMU (DAQ System)
• Control EMU (DCS System)
• Slice Test
• From Cosmic m to Mass Storage
• Track a Trigger Primitives a DAQ Chain a Physics
  Object
• Transition from Commissioning to Operation
• Upgrades

4
MO PhaseManagement Structure

• Maintenance Operation
• Direct line of management structure with 6 main
  L3 tasks
• CSC Maintenance
• FEE Integration Maintenance
• DAQ Interface and Slice Test
• DCS Controls
• Alignment, Calibration Database
• Operations
• US CMS, IHEP China and PNPI Russia will share
  responsibilities for the commissioning of the
  ME2, ME3 and ME1/2-ME1/3 system commissioning.
• For more on the Management Structure, see the
  attached document CMS Endcap Muon Chambers MO
  Phase Management Organization.

5
MO PhaseScope of Work (1)

• The MO Scope of work is described in the
  attached document CMS EMU MO Phase Guidelines,
  Responsibilities and Scope of Work.
• The document lists
• Expected Deliverables from the Project phase
• MO Deliverables
• Major Milestones
• Concurred on by L2 Project Manager, as well as
  L1-L2 MO Managers.

6
MO Scope of Work - ExampleCSC Maintenance (1)
7
MO Scope of Work ExampleCSC Maintenance (2)
8
MO Major Milestones

• MO EMU Milestones
• Ex DAQ Milestones
• (V33) ME slice Test (2 Stations) in SX5 30
  Nov 04
• (V33) CMS Ready in UX5 30 Apr 07

9
MO Resources Management Model (1)

• Based on CDF Commissioning Operation experience
• Funding for Critical Expertise and Institutional
  Memory Manpower (i.e. Engineers) to individual
  EMU institutions.
• Funding justified according to the MO tasks
  subscribed by each institution.
• Usual approval chain in effect (L1,L2, SOWs, )
• Funding for foreign collaborator support
  allocated according to signed CMS MOUs (PNPI,
  IHEP)
• MS funds in L2 hands
• Decrease funds transfer problems among
  Institutions.
• Allows flexibility in funds usage.
• Funding for low level technical manpower
  (mechanical and electronics technicians, riggers,
  etc.) and Software Engineering in L2 hands
• Allow flexibility in management of technicians
  and/or software engineers.

10
MO Resources Management Model (2)

• L2 Funds
• MS
• Technical Manpower
• Software Engineering
• Foreign Collaborators

• Institutional (L3) Funds
• Mechanical Engineering
• Electronics Engineering

11
EMU MO Funding

• Total MO EMU Funding 11.3 M
• Institutional Manpower 3.6 M
• FNAL MS 3.7 M
• CERN MS 4.0 M

12
MO vs. Base Program Manpower

• Total Average
• MO funded manpower 33 FTE-year 5.4 FTE-year
• Base Program (RA,PD) 122 FTE-year 21
  FTE-year
• Base Program _at_ CERN (RA,PD) 81 FTE-year 13
  FTE-year (65)

13
MO Manpower El.Eng. (1)
475 Trig Motherboard (UCLA)
48 Clock Control Board (Rice)
475 DAQ Motherboard (Ohio State)
48 Slow Control (Ohio State)
48 Custom Backplane (Florida)
FED Crate in USC55
2297 Cathode Front-end Board (Ohio State)
475 Anode LCT Board (UCLA)
475 LV Dist Board (Wisc, UCD)

• Boards
• 3000 complex PCB
• 10000 simple PCB
• 52 VME Crates

9742 Anode Front-end Board (CMU/PNPI)
14
MO Manpower El.Eng. (2)

• CDF Commissioning Operation experience
• CDF Calorimeter FEE and Readout 250 complex
  VME Cards (M.L.-P.W.)
• 6 FTE-y PD
• 1 FTE-y EE
• CDF XFT Electronics 216 complex VME Cards
  (R.H.)
• 6 FTE-y PD
• 1.5 FTE-y EE
• Total EE Resources in EMU MO Electronics
  Commissioning
• 3000 complex Cards
• 10000 simple FEE Cards
• 56 FTE-y PD in MO plan 71 of CDF Experience
• 11 FTE-Y EE in MO plan 70 of CDF Experience
• EE E-PD effort is comparable, but on the low
  side, of what has been the CDF Commissioning
  experience

15
MO Manpower Soft.Eng.

• CDF Commissioning Operation experience (M.L.)
• CDF Computing group 24 FTE for 2 years
  (B.Harris group)
• FNAL PPD Computing Professionals on CDF 4 FTE
  for 2 years.
• FNAL DB Programmers 3 FTE for 2 years.
• Institutional Contributions 10 FTE for 2 years.
• Total 80 FTE-year of Programming Manpower in
  CDF Commissioning
• D0 DAQ development (P.P.)
• 15 FTE-year, mostly staff
• Total Software Engineering Resources in EMU MO.
• Software Engineering on MO funds 26 FTE-years
• L2 18 FTE-year
• Institutions 8.5 FTE-year
• Software Eng. Effort in EMU is considerably lower
  than CDF.
• CMS EMU is not CDF/D0 (but its not far from
  CDF/D0 either)
• EMU HCAL Trigger will have to provide sizable
  contributions to Soft. Eng.
• Institutional Manpower (Base Program) will play a
  considerable role.

16
MO Ongoing Activities

• MO activities ongoing on two fronts
• DAQ Development Effort
• CSCs commissioning in SX5gas setup