Terry Chism FHWA Safety Engineer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Terry Chism FHWA Safety Engineer

Description:

Terry Chism FHWA Safety Engineer – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:207
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: tch76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Terry Chism FHWA Safety Engineer


1
Terry Chism FHWA Safety Engineer
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • Residents Engineers Conf.
  • 2006 Guardrail Process Review
  • Terry.chism_at_fhwa.dot.gov
  • 502-223-6750

2
Team Members
  • Terry Chism FHWA Transportation Safety Engineer
  • Mary Murray FHWA Transportation Engineer
  • Nasby Stroop KYTC Div of Construction
  • Jeff Jasper KYTC Div of Highway Design
  • Tim Gatewood KYTC Div of Highway Design
  • Various REs and Inspectors

3
Guardrail Process ReviewPurpose
  • Conducted a Process Review of Guardrail to
    evaluate current KYTC Design Standards and
    compliance with the design standards and
    construction specifications during construction

4
Guardrail Process ReviewScope
  • Active or recently completed projects
  • I-64, I-65, I-71, US 119 and KY 11
  • 11 Projects
  • Existing roadside barriers on southern I-75 and
    various Kentucky Parkways

5
Guardrail Process ReviewScope Current Barrier
End Terminal Types
  • Type 1 (energy absorbing, ET-2000, SKT)
  • Type 2A (solid rock cut)
  • Type 3 (buried in the back slope)
  • Type 4A (flared and gating, SRT)
  • Type 7 (KY Turndown)
  • Type IX (telescoping median barrier, CAT)
  • Cable median barriers

6
Guardrail Process ReviewScope Outdated and Non
Standard Terminals
  • Texas Twist
  • Buried in the Back Slope into man made mounds
  • Double Texas Twist in median
  • Mounded earth median bridge pier protection
  • Type 7 (KY Turndown)

7
Guardrail Process ReviewKYTC Best Practices
  • Kentuckys use of pre-tensioned Cable Median
    Barrier.
  • KYTC has good Standard Drawings for guardrail end
    terminals.
  • KYTC has improved efforts to upgrade roadside
    safety appurtenances on 3R projects.
  • KYTCs Type 1 Guardrail Energy Absorbing End
    Terminal has a phenomenal performance record
  • AASHTO Roadside Design Guide 5 Sessions

8
Six items in Executive Summary
  • Elimination of Texas Twist and Type 7 Turn Down
  • Type 2A End Terminal must be placed against a
    solid rock cut
  • Type 1 energy absorbing end terminal
  • Field reviews of 3R projects concerns
  • Roadside Safety Training needs
  • Consideration of Contractor and Inspector
    Certification for guardrail installation

9
1. Elimination of Texas Twist and Type 7 Turn
Down
  • Turndown end terminals have been prohibited by
    FHWA since 1990
  • Vaulting and rollover concerns
  • Still existing on Interstates and Parkways
  • FHWA pushing for a quick removal timetable

10
Texas Twist and Type 7 Turndown End Terminals
on Interstates and Parkways
11
Texas Twist and Type 7 Turndown End Terminals
on Interstates and Parkways
12
2. Type 2A End Terminal must be placed against a
solid rock cut
  • The Type 2A is a non-breakaway, generic device
    which can spear an impacting vehicle if it is not
    snugly placed against a solid rock cut.
  • Often incorrectly placed in cuts with partial
    rock.
  • Could/should use Type 3
  • Designers need to check in field
  • Construction can change End Terminal Types
  • KYTC looking at rock anchors other alternates

13
Good Type 2A End Terminal
14
Misuse of Type 2A End Terminal All could have
been Type 3 Buried in the Back Slope
15
Misuse of Type 2A End Terminal All could have
been Type 3 Buried in the Back Slope
16
Type 2A End Terminal can spear a vehicle not KY
photo
17
Type 2A End Terminal can spear a vehicle not KY
photo.
18
3. Type 1 energy absorbing guardrail end terminal
  • Phenomenal track record
  • Over 135 recorded hits and zero fatalities
  • The easiest end terminal to properly install and
    least earthwork required
  • This device could be utilized more often
  • Considering changes to Standard Drawings
    allowing in cuts

19
3. Type 1 energy absorbing end terminal
20
4. Field reviews of 3R projects concerns
  • New end terminals were generally placed at the
    same location as the old end terminal
  • This can result in improper length of need
  • Each end terminal needs to be reviewed by the
    designer in the field to assure that new end
    terminals are placed at proper locations.
  • NOTE Construction can change end terminal
    locations!!! May check design.

21
Pad and new terminal placed at old location but
side slope to steep before after rollover
potential
22
5. Roadside Safety Training needs
  • Need for training in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide
    and Guardrail Installation in all Districts for
    Design, Construction, Operations, Consultants,
    Contractors
  • KYTC has held 5 sessions of the AASHTO Roadside
    Design Guide Training in the last 2 years
    Excellent but need more
  • FHWA has offered to present guardrail training
    for Central Office and all District Offices

23
6. Consideration of Contractor and Inspector
Certification for guardrail installation
  • Review Team discussed this concept
  • INDOT has this type of certification
  • The KYTC has similar certification for Grade and
    Drain, Painting, Structures and Asphalt Lay Down.

24
Field Installation Problems Type 4A flared and
gating end terminal
  • Field reviews revealed problems with properly
    installing the Type 4A flared gating guardrail
    end terminal
  • Improper parabolic flare rates
  • Can result in spearing vehicles
  • Field measurements found none that met the flare
    rates in Standard Drawing RBR-035
  • KY exploring straight flare terminal

25
One Good and three poor Type 4A flares and
measuring demo
26
Syro-Trinity Straight Flare SRT-350 6 Post Design
27
Other construction safety concerns found during
field reviews
  • Type 3 end terminal without required concrete
    anchor
  • Non- breakaway steel I beam guide sign in clear
    zone
  • Breakaway slip bases covered with DGA
  • Frangible luminaire bases covered by DGA
  • Inadequate length of need
  • Uncompleted terminal work

28
Type 3 end terminal without required concrete
anchor ramping possibility
29
Type 3 end terminal without required concrete
anchor
30
Type 3 end terminal without buried in back slope
anchor
31
Non- breakaway steel I beam guide sign in clear
zone
32
Breakaway slip bases covered with DGA
33
Frangible luminaire bases covered by DGA
34
Inadequate length of need
35
Uncompleted terminal workRecommend lay down 4
sections
36
For Installation GuidesWeb sites phone numbers
  • www.Energyabsorption.com
  • 1-888-32-ENERGY
  • www.roadsystems.com
  • 815-464-5917
  • SYRO Trinity www.highway-safety.com
  • 1-800-644-syro (7976)
  • FHWA NCHRP 305 Approval Web site
    http//safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/road_hardw
    are/index.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com